Evaporation of droplets on strongly and weakly pinning surfaces and dynamics of the triple line

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Volumn 385, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 235-240

  Bormashenko, Edward ^a   Musin, Albina ^a   Zinigrad, Michael ^a  

^a ARIEL UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Equilibrium contact angle; Evaporation of droplets; Potential barrier; Solid substrate; Stick slip motion; Triple line

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ANGLE; EVAPORATION; FREONS; METALLIC COMPOUNDS; NUCLEAR PHYSICS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; POLYMERS; SLIP FORMING; SUBSTRATES;

METALLIC SURFACE; POLYMER SUBSTRATE; POLYMER SURFACES; POTENTIAL BARRIER; POTENTIAL BARRIERS; SOLID SUBSTRATE; STICK SLIP MOTION; STICK-SLIP; TRIPLE LINES; WATER DROPLETS;

DROPS;

METAL; POLYMER;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COLLOID; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; EVAPORATION; HYSTERESIS; LIQUID; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHANAHAN SEFIANE MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; WATER DROPLET;

EID: 79960648107     PISSN: 09277757     EISSN: 18734359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Young Th. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1805, 95:65-87.
2. Adam N.K. Use of the term Young equation for contact angles. Nature 1957, 180:809-810.
3. de Gennes P.G., Brochard-Wyart F., Quéré D. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena 2003, Springer, Berlin.
4. Erbil H.Y. Surface Chemistry of Solid and Liquid Interfaces 2006, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
5. Good R.J., Girifalco L.A. A theory for estimation of surface and interfacial energies. III. Estimation of surface energies of solids from contact angle data. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64:561-565.
6. Johnson R.E., Dettre R.H. Contact angle hysteresis. III. Study of an idealized heterogeneous surface. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68:1744-1750.
7. Johnson R.E., Dettre R.H. Contact angle hysteresis. IV. Contact angle measurements on heterogeneous surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69:1507-1515.
8. Bartell F.E., Shepard J.W. Surface roughness as related to hysteresis of contact angles. II. The Systems paraffin-3 molar calcium chloride solution-air and paraffin-glycerol-air. J. Phys. Chem. 1953, 57:455-458.
9. Joanny J.F., De Gennes P.G. A model for contact angle hysteresis. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81:552-562.
10. Chibowski E. Surface free energy of a solid from contact angle hysteresis. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 103:149-172.
11. Chibowski E. On some relations between advancing, receding and Young's contact angles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 133:51-59.
12. Reyssat M., Quéré D. Contact angle hysteresis generated by strong dilute defects. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113:3906-3909.
13. Nosonovsky M. Model for solid-solid and solid-liquid friction on rough surfaces with adhesion hysteresis. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:224701.
14. Marmur A. Soft contact: measurement and interpretation of contact angles. Soft Matter 2006, 2:12-17.
15. Krasovitski B., Marmur A. Drops down the hill: theoretical study of limiting contact angles and the hysteresis range on a tilted plate. Langmuir 2005, 21:3881-3885.
16. Bormashenko Ed., Bormashenko Ye., Whyman G., Pogreb R., Musin A., Jager R., Barkay Z. Contact angle hysteresis on polymer substrates established with various experimental techniques, its interpretation, and quantitative characterization. Langmuir 2008, 24:4020-4025.
17. Tadmor R. Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding and Young contact angles. Langmuir 2004, 20:7659-7664.
18. Yadav P.S., Bahadur Pr., Tadmor R., Chaurasia K., Leh A. Drop retention force as a function of drop size. Langmuir 2008, 24:3181-3184.
19. Vedantam S., Panchagnula M.V. Phase field modeling of hysteresis in sessile drops. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99:176102.
20. Vedantam S., Panchagnula M.V. Contact angle hysteresis modeling for sessile drops. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 321:393-400.
21. Yaminsky V.V. Molecular mechanisms of hydrophobic transitions. Apparent and Microscopic Contact Angles 2000, 47-95. VSP BV, Utrecht. J. Drelich, J.S. Laskowski, K.L. Mittal (Eds.).
22. Tadmor R., Yadav P.S. As-placed contact angles for sessile drops. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 317:241-246.
23. Abdelsalam M.E., Bartlett Ph.N., Kelf K., Baumberg J. Wetting of regularly structured gold surfaces. Langmuir 2005, 21:1753-1757.
24. Iveson S.M., Holt S., Biggs S. Preventing the back flow of air down packed columns during powder contact angle measurements. Colloids Surf. A 2000, 166:203-214.
25. Iveson S.M., Holt S., Biggs S. Advancing contact angle of iron ores as a function of their hematite and goethite content: implications for pelletising and sintering. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2004, 74:281-287.
26. Bormashenko E., Pogreb R., Stein T., Whyman G., Erlich M., Musin A., Machavariani V., Aurbach D. Characterization of rough surfaces with vibrated drops. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 27:4056-4061.
27. Wang R., Takeda M., Kido M. Micro pure water wettability evaluation of SUS304 steel with a tapping mode of atomic force microscope. Scripta Mater. 2002, 46:83-87.
28. Wang R.L., Cong L., Kido M. Evaluation of the wettability of metal surfaces by micro-pure water evaluated by means of atomic force microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 191:74-84.
29. Bewig K.W., Zisman W.A. The wetting of gold and platinum by water. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69:4238-4242.
30. Cassie A.B.D. Contact angles. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1948, 3:11-16.
31. Wenzel R.N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28:988-994.
32. Lafuma A., Quėrė D. Superhydrophobic states. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2:457-460.
33. Liu J., Mei Y., Xia R. A new wetting mechanism based upon triple contact line pinning. Langmuir 2011, 27:196-200.
34. Nosonovsky M. On the range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie equations. Langmuir 2007, 23:9919-9920.
35. Bormashenko E. A variational approach to wetting of composite surfaces: is wetting of composite surfaces a one-dimensional or two-dimensional phenomenon?. Langmuir 2009, 25:10451-10454.
36. Shanahan M.E.R. Simple theory of "Stick-Slip" wetting hysteresis. Langmuir 1995, 11:1041-1043.
37. Erbil H.Y., McHale G., Rowan S.M., Newton M.I. Determination of the receding contact angle of sessile drops on polymer surfaces by evaporation. Langmuir 1999, 15:7378-7385.
38. Bourge's-Monnier C., Shanahan M.E.R. Influence of evaporation on contact angle. Langmuir 1995, 11:2820-2829.
39. Tavana H., Yang G., Yip C., Appelhans D., Zschoche St., Grundke K., Hair M.L., Neumann A.W. Stick-slip of the three-phase line in measurements of dynamic contact angles. Langmuir 2006, 22:628-636.
40. Shanahan M.E.R., Sefiane K. Kinetics of Triple Line Motion During Evaporation. Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion 2009, vol. 6. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, pp. 19-31.
41. Kawai H. The piezoelectricity of poly(vinylidene fluoride). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1969, 8:975-976.
42. Bormashenko Ed., Pogreb R., Socol Ye., Hakham Itzhaq M., Streltsov V., Sutovski S., Sheshnev A., Bormashenko Ye. Polyvinylidene fluoride - piezoelectric polymer for integrated infrared optics applications. Opt. Mater. 2004, 27:429-434.
43. Starov V.M., Velarde M.G. Surface forces and wetting phenomena. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21:464121.
44. Amirfazli A., Neumann A.W. Status of the three-phase line tension: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 110:121-141.
45. Checco A., Guenoun P. Nonlinear dependence of the contact angle of nanodroplets on contact line curvature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91:186101.
46. Wong T.-S., Ho Ch.-M. Dependence of macroscopic wetting on nanoscopic surface textures. Langmuir 2009, 25:12851-12854.
47. Tadmor R., Bahadur Pr., Leh A., N'guessan H.E., Jaini R., Dang L. Measurement of lateral adhesion forces at the interface between a liquid drop and a substrate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103:266101.
48. Tadmor R. Approaches in wetting phenomena. Soft Matter 2011, 7:1577-1580.