The role of the transverse acetabular ligament for acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: An analysis of acetabular component position and range of movement using navigation software

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 93 B, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1021-1026

  Kalteis, T ^a   Sendtner, E ^a   Beverland, D ^a,c   Archbold, P A ^a,d   Hube, R ^a,b   Schuster, T ^a,e   Renkawitz, T ^a   Grifka, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b OCM Clinic   (Germany)

^c MUSGROVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d ALTNAGELVIN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HIP; HUMAN; LIGAMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRANSVERSE ACETABULAR LIGAMENT;

ACETABULUM; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORIENTATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79960643909     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.25720     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978;60-A:217-20. (Pubitemid 8311727)
2. Harris WH. Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop 1980;146:188-204. (Pubitemid 10139036)
3. Harkess WJ. Arthroplasty of the hip: dislocation and subluxation. In: Crenshaw AH, ed. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. Eighth ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1992:54.
4. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004;22:815-21. (Pubitemid 38756262)
5. Del Schutte H Jr, Lipman AJ, Bannar SM, et al. Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:621-6. (Pubitemid 28413588)
6. Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:530-4. (Pubitemid 28380811)
7. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the conjunction of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:315-21. (Pubitemid 30140332)
8. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 1990;261:159-70.
9. Archbold HA, Slomczykowski M, Crone M, et al. The relationship of the orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular labrum to the suggested safe zones of cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2008;18:1-6. (Pubitemid 351712144)
10. Pearce CJ, Sexton SA, Davies DC, Khaleel A. The transverse acetabular ligament may be used to align the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2008;18:7-10. (Pubitemid 351712145)
11. Archbold HA, Mockford B, Molloy D, et al. The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:883-6. (Pubitemid 44057174)
12. Miki H, Yamanashi W, Nishii T, et al. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:946-52. (Pubitemid 47498917)
13. Lin LIK. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biomaterials 2000;56:324-5.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
15. Bowker AH. A test for symmetry in contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc 1948;43:572-4.
16. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:228-32. (Pubitemid 23087178)
17. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning: a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 2004;28:198-201. (Pubitemid 39150312)
18. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:80-4. (Pubitemid 28082640)
19. Digioia AM 3rd, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:359-64. (Pubitemid 34290013)
20. Noble PC, Sugano N, Johnston JD, et al. Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position? Clin Orthop 2003;417:242-52. (Pubitemid 37499531)
21. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bäthis H, et al. Imageless navigation for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:163-7. (Pubitemid 43279924)
22. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman KR, Berry DJ. The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems. Clin Orthop 2009;467:43-9.