Overview of enteral and parenteral feeding access techniques: Principles and practice

Surgical Clinics of North America

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 897-911

  Phillips, Melissa S ^a   Ponsky, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Enteral access; Nutrition; Parenteral access

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; AIR EMBOLISM; ASCITES; ASPIRATION; BLEEDING; CARDIOPULMONARY FUNCTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DELIRIUM; DYSPHAGIA; EATING DISORDER; ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY; ENTERIC FEEDING; ENTERITIS; ESOPHAGUS STRICTURE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROTOMY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM; INJURY; INJURY SEVERITY; INOPERABLE CANCER; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALABSORPTION; MALNUTRITION; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; NECROTIZING COLITIS; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; OBESITY; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PERITONITIS; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFEEDING; REVIEW; STOMACH VOLVULUS; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; ENTERAL NUTRITION; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; PARENTERAL NUTRITION;

EID: 79960642999     PISSN: 00396109     EISSN: 15583171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. DeLegge M. Enteral access-the foundation of feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2001, 25:58.
2. Mazaki T., Ebisawa K. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2008, 12(4):739-755.
3. Braunschweig C., Levy P., Sheean P., et al. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2001, 74:534.
4. Moore F.A., Feliciano D.V., Andrassy R.J., et al. Early enteral feeding, compared with parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. The results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1992, 216(2):172-183.
5. Bozzetti F., Braga M., Gavazzi C., et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001, 358:1487.
6. George D., Falk P., Umberto Meduri G., et al. Nosocomial sinusitis in patients in the medical intensive care unit: a prospective epidemiological study. Clin Infect Dis 1998, 27(3):463-470.
7. Gauderer M., Ponsky J., Izant R. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980, 15:872-875.
8. Russell T., Brotman M., Norris F. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a new simplified and cost effective technique. Am J Surg 1984, 148:132-137.
9. Arrowsmith J., Gertsman B., Fleischer D., et al. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/US Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1991, 37:421-427.
10. Holzman R., Cullen D., Eichhorn J., et al. Guidelines for sedation by nonanesthesiologists during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. J Clin Anesth 1994, 6:265-276.
11. Jane P. Technique of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1994, 4:501-521.
12. Foutch P., Talbert G., Waring J., et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with prior abdominal surgery: virtues of the safe tract. Am J Gastroenterol 1988, 83:147-150.
13. Sartori S., Trevisani L., Nielsen I., et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement using the pull-through or push-through techniques: is the second pass of the gastroscope necessary?. Endoscopy 1996, 28(8):686-688.
14. Cappell M. Risk factors and risk reduction of malignant seeding of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy track from pharyngoesophageal malignancy: a review of all 44 known reported cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102(6):1307-1311.
15. Sabnis A., Liu R., Chand B., et al. SLiC technique. A novel approach to percutaneous gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 2006, 20(2):256-262.
16. Kadakia S., O'Sullivan H., Starnes E., et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy and the incidence of aspiration in 79 patients. Am J Surg 1992, 164:114-117.
17. Pofahl W., Ringold F. Management of early dislodgment of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1999, 9(4):253-256.
18. Bhatia N., Collins J., Nguyen C., et al. Esophageal perforation as a complication of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Hosp Med 2008, 3(3):256-262.
19. Wiesen A., Sideridis K., Fernandes A., et al. True incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after PEG placement: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 64(6):886-889.
20. Blum C., Selander C., Ruddy J., et al. The incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of 722 cases. Am Surg 2009, 75(1):39-43.
21. Gauderer M., Stellato T. Gastrostomies: evolution, techniques, indications, and complications. Curr Probl Surg 1986, 23(9):657-719.
22. Duh Q., Way L. Laparoscopic gastrostomy using T-fasteners as retractors and anchors. Surg Endosc 1993, 7:60-63.
23. Macdonald S., Watt A., McNally D., et al. Comparison of technical success and outcomes of tunneled catheters inserted via the jugular and subclavian approaches. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000, 11:225-231.
24. Merrer J., DeJonghe B., Golliot F., et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2001, 286(6):700-707.
25. Keenan S. Use of ultrasound to place central lines. J Crit Care 2002, 17(2):126-137.
26. Hind D., Calvert N., McWilliams R., et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003, 327(7411):361.
27. Calvert N., Hind D., McWilliams R., et al. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Anaesthesia 2004, 59(11):1116-1120.
28. Raad I., Davis S., Becker M., et al. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe cost effective alternative for long-term venous access. Arch Intern Med 1993, 153:1791-1796.
29. Ryder M. Peripheral access options. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 1995, 4:395-427.
30. Safdar N., Maki D. Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients. Chest 2005, 128:489-495.
31. Ruesch S., Walder B., Tramer M. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access-a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2002, 30(2):454-460.
32. Giacomini M., Iapichino G., Armani S., et al. How to avoid and manage a pneumothorax. J Vasc Access 2006, 7(1):7-14.
33. Lorente L., Henry C., Martín M., et al. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care 2005, 9(6):R631-R635.
34. To err is human: building a safer health system. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine 2000, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. L. Kohn, J. Corrigan, M. Donaldson (Eds.).
35. Veenstra D., Saint S., Sullivan S. Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection. JAMA 1999, 282:554.
36. O'Grady N., Alexander M., Dellinger E., et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control 2002, 30:476.
37. Raad I., Hohn D., Gilbreath B., et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994, 15:231.
38. Maki D., Ringer M., Alvarado C. Prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 1991, 338:339.