When interspecific prezygotic barriers break down: Hybridization between two Potamogeton species (P. wrightii and P. perfoliatus) and comparison of the artificial and natural hybrids

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 295, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 119-128

  Zhang, Xiao Lin ^a   Li, Xiao Xia ^b   Ni, Le Yi ^a   Guo, You Hao ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (China)

^b WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Artificial hybridization; Fertility restoration; Hybrids; Potamogeton; Prezygotic barriers

Indexed keywords

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; POTAMOGETON; POTAMOGETON PERFOLIATUS;

EID: 79960617714     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: 16156110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-011-0470-y     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alix MS, Scribailo RW (2006) First report of Potamogeton × undulates (P. crispus × P. praelongus, Potamogetonaceae) in North America, with notes on morphology and stem anatomy. Rhodora 108(936): 329-346.
2. Arnold ML (1992) Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 237-261.
3. Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Arnold ML, Hodges SA (1995) Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol Evol 10(2): 67-71.
5. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (2000) Reproductive isolation: natural selection at work. Curr Biol 10: 68-70.
6. Cook CDK (1988) Wind pollination in aquatic angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 75: 768-777.
7. Diaz A, Macnair MR (1999) Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol 144: 471-478.
8. Du ZY, Yang CF, Chen JM, Guo YH (2009) Nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences data support the origin of Potamogeton intortusifolius J. B. He in China as a hybrid between P. perfoliatus Linn. and P. wrightii Morong. Aquat Bot 91: 47-50.
9. Fant JB, Preston CD (2004) Genetic structure and morphological variation of the British populations of the hybrid Potamogeton × salicifolius. Bot J Linn Soc 144: 99-111.
10. Fant JB, Preston CD, Barrett JA (2001a) Isozyme evidence for the origin of Potamogeton × sudermanicus as a hybrid between P. acutifolius and P. berchtoldii. Aquat Bot 71: 199-208.
11. Fant JB, Preston CD, Barrett JA (2001b) Isozyme evidence of the parental origin and possible fertility of the hybrid Potamogeton × fluitans Roth. Plant Syst Evol 229: 45-57.
12. Fant JB, Kamau E, Preston CD (2003) Chloroplast evidence for the multiple origins of the hybrid Potamogeton × sudermanicus Hagstr. Aquat Bot 75: 351-356.
13. Fant JB, Kamau E, Preston CD (2005) Chloroplast evidence for the multiple origins of the hybrid Potamogeton × fluitans. Aquat Bot 83: 154-160.
14. Guo YH, Cook CDK (1990) The floral biology of Groenlandia densa (L.) Fourreau (Potamogetonaceae). Aquat Bot 38: 283-288.
15. Hagström JO (1916) Critical researches on the Potamogetons. Kongl Svensk Vetensk Akad Handl 55: 1-281.
16. Hay F, Probert R, Dawson M (2008) Laboratory germination of seeds from 10 British species of Potamogeton. Aquat Bot 88: 353-357.
17. He JB, Zhou LY, Wang HQ (1988) New plants in Hubei China. Bull Bot Res Sin 8: 125-127.
18. Hellquist CB, Crow GE (1986) Potamogeton × haynesii (Potamogetonaceae), a new species from northeastern North America. Brittonia 38(4): 415-419.
19. Hollingsworth PM, Preston CD, Gornall RJ (1995) Isozyme evidence for hybridization between Potamogeton natans and P. nodosus (Potamogetonaceae) in Britain. Bot J Linn Soc 117: 59-69.
20. Iida S, Kadono Y (2002) Genetic diversity and origin of Potamogeton anguillanus (Potamogetonaceae) in Lake Biwa, Japan. J Plant Res 115: 11-16.
21. Kaplan Z (2001) Potamogeton × fluitans (P. natans × P. lucens) in the Czech Republic I. Morphology and anatomy. Preslia 73: 333-340.
22. Kaplan Z (2007) First record of Potamogeton × salicifolius for Italy, with isozyme evidence for plants collected in Italy and Sweden. Plant Biosyst 141(3): 344-351.
23. Kaplan Z, Fehrer J (2004) Evidence for the hybrid origin of Potamogeton × cooperi (Potamogetonaceae): traditional morphology-based taxonomy and molecular techniques in concert. Folia Geobot 39: 431-453.
24. Kaplan Z, Fehrer J (2006) Comparison of natural and artificial hybridization in Potamogeton. Preslia 78: 303-316.
25. Kaplan Z, Štěpánek J (2003) Genetic variation within and between populations of Potamogeton pusillus agg. Plant Syst Evol 239: 95-112.
26. Kaplan Z, Wolff P (2004) A morphological, anatomical and isozyme study of Potamogeton × schreberi: confirmation of its recent occurrence in Germany and first documented record in France. Preslia 76: 141-161.
27. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot.
28. Khatun S, Flowers TJ (1995) The estimation of pollen viability in rice. J Exp Bot 46(282): 51-154.
29. Lee CB, Page LE, McClure BA, Holtsford TP (2008) Post-pollination hybridization barriers in Nicotiana section Alatae. Sex Plant Reprod 21: 183-195.
30. Mayr E (1992) A local flora and the biological species concept. Am J Bot 79(2): 222-238.
31. Plitmann U, Levin DA (1983) Pollen-pistil relationships in the Polemoniaceae. Evolution 37: 957-967.
32. Preston CD (1995a) Pondweeds of Great Britain and Ireland. Botanical Society of the British Isles, London.
33. Preston CD (1995b) Potamogeton × schreberi G. Fisch. (P. natans L. × P. nodosus Poir) in Dorset, new to the British Isles. Watsonia 20: 255-262.
34. Preston CD, Hollingsworth PM, Gornall RJ (1998) Potamogeton pectinatus L. × P. vaginatus Turcz. (P. × bottnicus Hagstr.), a newly identified hybrid in the British Isles. Watsonia 22: 69-82.
35. Rieseberg LH (1995) The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. Am J Bot 82(7): 944-953.
36. Rieseberg LH (1997) Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28: 359-389.
37. Rieseberg LH, Ellstrand NC (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit Rev Plant Sci 12(3): 213-241.
38. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH (2007) Plant speciation. Science 317: 910-914.
39. Rodriguez-Riano T, Dafni A (2000) A new procedure to assess pollen viability. Sex Plant Reprod 12: 241-244.
40. Sculthorpe CD (1967) The biology of aquatic vascular plants. St. Martin's Press, New York.
41. Stace CA (1975) Hybridization: and the flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London.
42. Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London.
44. Stone JL, Thomson JD, Dent-Acosta SJ (1995) Assessment of pollen viability in hand-pollination experiments: a review. Am J Bot 82(9): 1186-1197.
45. Wagner WH Jr (1969) The role of taxonomic treatment of hybrids. Bioscience 19(9): 785-795.
46. Wagner WH Jr (1970) Biosystematics and evolutionary noise. Taxon 19(2): 146-151.
47. Whittall JB, Hellquist CB, Schneider EL, Hodges SA (2004) Cryptic species in an endangered pondweed community (Potamogeton, Potamogetonaceae) revealed by AFLP markers. Am J Bot 91: 2022-2029.
48. Wiegleb G, Kaplan Z (1998) An account of the species of Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae). Folia Geobot 33: 241-316.
49. Zhang XL, Gituru RW, Yang CF, Guo YH (2009) Variations of floral traits among different life forms illustrate the evolution of pollination systems in Potamogeton species from China. Aquat Bot 90(2): 124-128.
50. Zhang XL, Gituru RW, Yang CF, Guo YH (2010) Exposure to water increased pollen longevity of pondweed (Potamogeton spp.) indicates different mechanisms ensuring pollination success of angiosperms in aquatic habitat. Evol Ecol 24: 939-953.