A semantic privacy-preserving model for data sharing and integration

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Hu, Yuh Jong ^a   Yang, Jiun Jan ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

data sharing and integration; database; ontology and rule; privacy protection; query rewriting; semantic web; semantics enabled policy; www

Indexed keywords

DATA SHARING AND INTEGRATION; DATABASE; PRIVACY PROTECTION; QUERY REWRITINGS; SEMANTICS-ENABLED POLICY;

ACCESS CONTROL; DATA PRIVACY; INTEGRATION; ONTOLOGY; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 79960609189     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1988688.1988700     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. A. H. Anderson. A comparison of two privacy policy languages: EPAL and XACML. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Secure Web Services (SWS'06), pages 53-60. ACM, 2006.
2. I. A. Antón et al. A roadmap for comprehensive online for privacy policy management. Comm. of the ACM, 50(7):109-116, July 2007.
3. A. P. Bernstein and L. M. Haas. Information integration in the enterprise. Comm. of the ACM, 51(8):72-79, July 2008.
4. A. P. Bonatti et al. An algebra for composing access control policies. ACM Trans. on Information and Systems Security, 5(1):1-35, February 2002.
5. P. Bonatti and D. Olmedilla. Policy language specification, enforcement, and integration. project deliverable D2, working group I2. Technical report, REWERSE, 2005.
6. J. d. Bruijn. RIF RDF and OWL compatibility. Technical report, W3C, Oct. 2009.
7. D. Calvanese et al. Description logic framework for information integration. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 2-13. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
8. D. Calvanese et al. Data integration through DL - LiteA ontologies. In 3rd Int. Workshop on Semantics in Data and Knowledge Base (SDKB), volume 4925, pages 26-47. Springer, 2008.
9. D. Calvanese et al. View-based query answering over description logic ontologies. In Proc. of KR-2008. AAAI Press, 2008.
10. D. Calvanese and G. D. Giacomo. Data integration: A logic-based perspective. AI Magazine, 26(1):59-70, 2005.
11. D. Calvanses et al. Description logics for information integration. In Computational Logic, LNAI 2408, pages 41-60. Springer, 2002.
12. C. Clifton et al. Privacy-preserving data integration and sharing. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 19-26. ACM, 2004.
13. J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko. Ontology Matching. Springer-Verlag, 2007.
14. M. Friedman et al. Navigational plans for data integration. In Proc. of the Sixteen National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'99), pages 67-73. AAAI/MIT Press, 1999.
15. F. Goasdoué and M.-C. Rousset. Answering queries using views: a KRDB perspective for the semantic web. ACM Trans. on Internet Technology, 4(3):255-288, August 2004.
16. C. B. Grau et al. Modular reuse of ontologies: Theory and practice. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, pages 273-318, 2008.
17. C. B. Grau et al. OWL2: The next step for OWL. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3, pages 309-322, 2008.
18. A. Halevy, A. Rajaraman, and J. Ordille. Data integration: The teenage years. In VLDB'06, pages 9-16. ACM, 2006.
19. Y. A. Halevy. Answering queries using views: A survey. The VLDB Journal, 10(4):270-294, 2001.
20. I. Horrocks et al. OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3, 3(1):23-40, 2005.
21. Y. J. Hu and H. Boley. Sempif: A semantic meta-policy interchange format for multiple web policies. In 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, pages 302-307. IEEE, 2010.
22. S. Jajodia et al. Flexible support for multiple access control policies. ACM Trans. on Database Systems, 26(2):214-260, June 2001. (Pubitemid 33661632)
23. E. Jiménez-Ruiz et al. Ontology integration using mappings: Towards getting the right logical consequences. In ESWC 2009, LNCS 5554, pages 173-187. Springer, 2009.
24. G. Karjoth and M. Schunter. A privacy policy model for enterprises. In 15th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW). IEEE, June 2002.
25. G. Karjoth, M. Schunter, and E. V. Herreweghen. Translating privacy practices into privacy promises - how to promise what you can keep. In POLICY'03. IEEE, 2003.
26. M. Lenzerini. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), pages 233-246. ACM, 2002.
27. Y. A. Levy. Logic-based techniques in data integration. In T. Yu and S. Jajodia, editors, Logic-based Artificial Intelligence, pages 1-27. Kulwer, 2001.
28. P. Mazzoleni et al. XACML policy integration algorithms. ACM Trans. on Information and System Security, 11(1), 2008.
29. B. Motik, U. Sattler, and R. Studer. Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. In 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) 2004, LNCS 3298, pages 549-563. Springer, 2004.
30. A. Nash and A. Deutsch. Privacy in GLAV information integration. In ICDT 2007, LNCS 4353, pages 89-103. Springer, 2007.
31. J. M. O'Connor and A. K. Das. SQWRL: a query language for OWL. In OWLED, volume 529. CEUR, 2009.
32. J. Park and R. T. Sandhu. The UCONABC usage control model. ACM Trans. on Information and System Security, 7(1):128-174, 2004.
33. A. Poggi et al. Linking data to ontologies. Journal on Data Semantics X, 4900:133-173, 2008.
34. D. J. Ullman. Information integration using logical views. Theoretical Computer Science, 239:189-210, 2000.
35. S. D. C. d. Vimercati et al. Access control policies and languages in open environments. In T. Yu and S. Jajodia, editors, Secure Data Management in Decentralized Systems, pages 21-58. Springer, 2007.