A study of the 16-segment regional wall motion scoring index and Biplane Simpson's rule for the calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction: A comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Echocardiography

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 597-604

  Duncan, Rae F ^a,b   Dundon, Ben K ^a   Nelson, Adam J ^a   Pemberton, James ^b   Williams, Kerry ^a   Worthley, Matthew I ^a   Zaman, Azfar ^b   Thomas, Honey ^b   Worthley, Stephen G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac magnetic resonance; left ventricular systolic function; regional wall motion score; Simpson's rule

Indexed keywords

16 SEGMENT REGIONAL WALL MOTION SCORING INDEX; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIPLANE SIMPSON RULE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; HYPERKINESIA; HYPOKINESIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 79960607732     PISSN: 07422822     EISSN: 15408175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01394.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, et al,: ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography-Summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to update the 19997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 954-970. (Pubitemid 37069224)
2. Teo KSL, Carbone A, Piantadosi C, et al,: Cardiac MRI assessment of left and right ventricular parameters in Healthy Normal Australian Volunteers. Heart, Lung Circul 2008; 17: 313-317.
3. Kuhl HP, Schreckenberg M, Rulands D, et al,: High resolution transthoracic real-time three dimensional echocardiography-Quantification of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automated border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2083-2090. (Pubitemid 38686806)
4. Kim WY, Sogaard P, Kristensen BO, et al,: Measurement of left ventricular volumes by 3-dimensional echocardiography with tissue harmonic imaging: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 169-179. (Pubitemid 33791846)
5. Bu L, Munns S, Zang H, et al,: Rapid full volume data acquisition by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular indexes in children: a validation study compared with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 299-305. (Pubitemid 40470392)
6. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al,: Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440-1463. (Pubitemid 41821197)
7. Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, et al,: Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 878-886. (Pubitemid 39099588)
8. Thomson HL, Basmadjian AJ, Rainbird AJ, et al,: Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: A prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 867-875. (Pubitemid 32835766)
9. Gardner BI, Bingham SE, Allen MR, et al,: Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac volumes and regional function after myocardial infarction: an intrasubject comparison using simultaneous intrasubject recordings. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2009; 7: 38. doi:.
10. Chuang ML, Hiberd MG, Salton CJ, et al,: Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: Assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 477-484. (Pubitemid 30125541)
11. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al,: Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1387-1396. (Pubitemid 30599134)
12. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, et al,: ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. Summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1703-1740.
13. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal guidance 120. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy for the treatment of heart failure. May 2007. Available at:. Accessed 17 July 2007.
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal guidance 95. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators for arrhythmias. January 2006. Available at:. [Accessed January 25, 2006].