The not-so-simple effects of boundary conditions on models of simple shear

Geology

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 719-722

  Frehner, Marcel ^a   Exner, Ulrike ^a   Mancktelow, Neil S ^b   Grujic, Djordje ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b GEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOG MODELING; ANALOG MODELS; BOUNDARY EFFECTS; FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH; GEOLOGICAL PROCESS; HETEROGENEOUS STRAIN; INTERNAL DEFORMATION; INTERNAL STRAINS; MATRIX; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PLANE-STRAIN; SIMPLE SHEAR; STRAIN FIELDS; VISCOUS DRAG;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DEFORMATION; DRAG; EXPERIMENTS; LUBRICATION; MATERIALS; PARAFFIN WAXES; PARAFFINS; SILICONES;

SHEAR FLOW;

ANALOG MODEL; BOUNDARY CONDITION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FOLDING; INCLUSION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SHEAR; VORTICITY;

EID: 79960599210     PISSN: 00917613     EISSN: 19432682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1130/G31957.1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adam, J., Urai, J.L., Wieneke, B., Oncken, O., Pfeiffer, K., Kukowski, N., Lohrmann, J., Hoth, S., van der Zee, W., and Schmatz, J., 2005, Shear localisation and strain distribution during tectonic faulting-New insights from granularflow experiments and high-resolution optical image correlation techniques: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 27, p. 283-301, doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2004.08.008.
2. Bons, P.D., Druguet, E., Hamann, I., Carreras, J., and Passchier, C.W., 2004, Apparent boudinage in dykes: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 26, p. 625-636, doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2003.11.009.
3. Budhu, M., 1984, Nonuniformities imposed by simple shear apparatus: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, v. 21, p. 125-137, doi:10.1139/t84-010.
4. Cobbold, P.R., and Quinquis, H., 1980, Development of sheath folds in shear regimes: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 2, p. 119-126, doi:10.1016/0191-8141(80)90041-3.
5. Cotton, J.T., and Koyi, H.A., 2000, Modeling of thrust fronts above ductile and frictional detachments: Application to structures in the Salt Range and Potwar Plateau, Pakistan: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 112, p. 351-363, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<351: MOTFAD>2.0.CO;2.
6. Frehner, M., and Schmalholz, S.M., 2006, Numerical simulations of parasitic folds in multilayers: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 28, p. 1647-1657, doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2006.05.008.
7. Grujic, D., and Mancktelow, N.S., 1995, Folds with axes parallel to the extension direction: An experimental study: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 17, p. 279-291, doi:10.1016/0191-8141(94)E0048-4.
8. Ildefonse, B., and Mancktelow, N.S., 1993, Deformation around rigid particles: The influence of slip at the particle/matrix interface: Tectono physics, v. 221, p. 345-359, doi:10.1016/0040-1951(93)90166-H.
9. Ildefonse, B., Sokoutis, D., and Mancktelow, N.S., 1992, Mechanical interactions between rigid particles in a deforming ductile matrix. Analogue experiments in simple shear flow: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 14, p. 1253-1266, doi:10.1016/0191-8141(92)90074-7.
10. Mancktelow, N.S., 1988a, An automated machine for pure shear deformation of analogue materials in plane strain: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 10, p. 101-108, doi:10.1016/0191-8141(88)90132-0.
11. Mancktelow, N.S., 1988b, The rheology of paraffin wax and its usefulness as an analogue for rocks: Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, new series, v. 14, p. 181-193.
12. Mandal, N., Samanta, S.K., Bhattacharyya, G., and Chakraborty, C., 2005, Rotation behaviour of rigid inclusions in multiple association: Insights from experimental and theoretical models: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 27, p. 679-692, doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2004.11.007.
13. Marques, F.O., and Coelho, S., 2001, Rotation of rigid elliptical cylinders in viscous simple shear flow: Analogue experiments: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 23, p. 609-617, doi:10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00135-8.
14. Piazolo, S., ten Gotenhuis, S.M., and Passchier, C.W., 2001, New apparatus for controlled general flow modeling of analog material, in Koyi, H.A., and Mancktelow, N., eds., Tectonic modeling: A volume in honor of Hans Ramberg: Geological Society of America Memoir 193, p. 235-244, doi:10.1130/0-8137-1193-2.235.
15. Price, G.P., and Torok, P.A., 1989, A new simple shear deformation apparatus for rocks and solids: Tectonophysics, v. 158, p. 291-309, doi:10.1016/0040-1951(89)90329-6.
16. Sengupta, S., and Koyi, H.A., 2001, Modifications of early lineations during later folding in simple shear, in Koyi, H.A., and Mancktelow, N., eds., Tectonic modeling: A volume in honor of Hans Ramberg: Geological Society of America Memoir 193, p. 51-68, doi:10.1130/0-8137-1193-2.51.
17. ten Grotenhuis, S.M., Piazolo, S., Pakula, T., Passchier, C.W., and Bons, P.D., 2002, Are polymers suitable rock analogs?: Tectonophysics, v. 350, p. 35-47, doi:10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00080-X.
18. Wood, D.M., Drescher, A., and Budhu, M., 1979, On the determination of stress state in the simple shear apparatus: Geotechnical Testing Journal, v. 2, p. 211-221, doi:10.1520/GTJ10460J.