The effect of dynamic fundamental frequency on the perception of duration

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 375-387

  Cumming, Ruth ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960589936     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andreassen H.N. Aspects de la durée vocalique dans le vaudois. Bulletin PFC: Phonologie du Français Contemporain-Usages, Variétés et Structure 2006, 6:115-134.
2. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(4):390-412.
4. Benguerel A.-P. Duration of French vowels in unemphatic stress. Language and Speech 1971, 14:383-391.
5. Benguerel A.-P. Corrélats physiologiques de l'accent en français. Phonetica 1973, 27:21-35.
6. Bertinetto, P. M., & Bertini, C. (2008). On modeling the rhythm of natural languages. In Proceedings of the fourth conference on speech prosody, Campinas, Brazil.
7. Boersma, P., & Weenik, D. (2007). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version 4.6.30) [Computer program]. Retrieved 3 October 2007, from http://www.praat.org/.
8. Cumming, R. E. (2010). Speech rhythm: The language-specific integration of pitch and duration. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.
9. D'Ausilio A., Pulvermüller F., Salmas P., Bufalari I., Begliomini C., Fadiga L. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology 2009, 19(5):381-385.
10. Delattre P. Studies in French and comparative phonetics: English, German, Spanish, and French 1966, Groos, Heidelberg.
11. Dellwo V. Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for deltaC. Language and language processing: Proceedings of the 38th linguistic colloquium 2006, 231-241. Peter Lang, Frankfurt. P. Karnowski, I. Szigeti (Eds.).
12. Di Cristo A. Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: Première partie. French Language Studies 1999, 9:143-179.
13. Di Cristo A. Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: Deuxième partie. French Language Studies 2000, 10:27-44.
14. Fadiga L., Craighero L., Buccino G., Rizzolatti G. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 15:399-402.
15. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2005, Sage, London.
16. Fitzpatrick-Cole, J. (1999). The alpine intonation of Bern Swiss German. In Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences, San Francisco, USA.
17. Fleischer J., Schmid S. Illustrations of the IPA: Zurich German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2006, 36(2):243-253.
18. Galloway, R. E. (2007). Bilinguals' interacting phonologies? A study of speech production in French~Swiss German bilinguals. MPhil thesis, University of Cambridge.
19. Grabe E., Low E.L. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in laboratory phonology 2002, Vol. 7:515-543. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
20. Grosjean F., Carrard S., Godio C., Grosjean L. Long and short vowels in Swiss French: Their production and perception. French Language Studies 2007, 17:1-19.
21. Haas W. Die deutschsprachige Schweiz. Die vier-sprachige Schweiz 1982, 73-160. Benziger, Zürich and Cologne. R. Schläpfer (Ed.).
22. International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Häsler K., Hove I., Siebenhaar B. Die Prosodie des Schweizerdeutschen-Erkenntnisse aus der sprachsynthetischen Modellierung von Dialekten. Linguistik Online 2005, 24(3):187-224.
24. Haugen E. Dialect, language, nation. Sociolinguistics 1966, 97-116. Penguin, Harmondsworth. J.B. Pride, J. Holmes (Eds.).
25. Hornik, K. (2008). Frequently asked questions on R, Retrieved 19 November 2008. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html%23Why-are-p_002dvalues-not-displayed-when-using-lmer_0028_0029_003f.
26. House D. Tonal perception in speech 1990, Lund University Press, Lund.
27. Jun S.-A., Fougeron C. A phonological model of French intonation. Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology 2000, 209-242. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, London. A. Botinis (Ed.).
28. Knecht P., Rubattel C. A propos de la dimension sociolinguistique du français en Suisse romande. Le Français Moderne 1984, 52(3/4):138-150.
29. Kohler K.J. Whither speech rhythm research?. Phonetica 2009, 66:5-14.
30. Lee C.S., Todd N.P.M. Towards an auditory account of speech rhythm: Application of a model of the auditory 'primal sketch' to two multi-language corpora. Cognition 2004, 93:225-254.
31. Leeman, A., & Siebenhaar, B. (2007). Intonational and temporal features of Swiss German. In Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany.
32. Lehiste I. Influence of fundamental frequency pattern on the perception of duration. Journal of Phonetics 1976, 4:113-117.
33. Lehnert-LeHouillier, H. (2007). The influence of dynamic F0 on the perception of vowel duration: Cross-linguistic evidence. In Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany.
34. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 1967, 74:431-461.
35. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36.
36. Low, E. L. (1998). Prosodic prominence in Singapore English. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.
37. Mertens, P. (1991). Local prominence of acoustic and psychoacoustic functions and perceived stress in French. In Proceedings of the 12th international congress of phonetic sciences, Aix-en-Provence, France.
38. Miller, J. S. (2007). Swiss French prosody: Intonation, rate and speaking style in the Vaud canton. Doctoral thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
39. Nolan, F., & Hausmann, T. (2005). Are phrase tones in Swiss German intonation stress-seeking? Poster presented at the between stress and tone conference, Leiden, the Netherlands, 16-18 June 2005.
40. Parmenter C.E., Blanc A.V. An experimental study of accent in French and English. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (PMLA) 1933, 48:598-607.
41. Pisoni D.B. Fundamental frequency and perceived vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1976, 59(S1):S39.
42. Post, B. (2000). Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. Doctoral thesis, Catholic University of Nijmegen.
43. Ramus F., Nespor M., Mehler J. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 1999, 73(3):263-292.
44. Rash F.J. The German language in Switzerland: Multilingualism, diglossia and variation 1998, Peter Lang, Bern.
45. Rigault, A. (1962). RÔle de la fréquence, de l'intensité et de la durée vocalique dans la perception de l'accent en français. In Proceedings of the fourth international congress of phonetic sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
46. Rosen S.M. Fundamental frequency patterns and the long-short vowel distinction in Swedish. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1977, 1:31-37.
47. Rosen S.M. The effect of fundamental frequency patterns on perceived duration. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report 1977, 1:17-30.
48. Singy P. L'image du français en Suisse romande: Une enquĉte sociolinguistique en Pays de Vaud 1996, L'Harmattan, Paris and Montreal.
49. Tilsen S., Johnson K. Low-frequency Fourier analysis of speech rhythm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124(2):EL34-EL39.
50. Vaissière, J. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In J. Sundberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson (Eds.), Music, language, speech and brain: Proceedings of an international symposium at the Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, 5-8 September 1990 (pp. 108-120).
51. Van Dommelen, W. (1991). F0 and the perception of duration. In Proceedings of the 12th international congress of phonetic sciences, Aix-en-Provence, France.
52. Van Dommelen W. Does dynamic F0 increase perceived duration? New light on an old issue. Journal of Phonetics 1993, 21:367-386.
53. Voillat, F. (1971). Aspects du français régional actuel. Actes du colloque de dialectologie francoprovençale, Neuchâtel 1969 (pp. 216-241).
54. Wang W.S.-Y., Lehiste I., Chuang C.-K., Darnovsky N. Perception of vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1976, 60(S1):S92.
55. Wiese R. The phonology of German 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
56. Yu, A. C. L. (2010). Tonal effects on perceived vowel duration. In C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D'Imperio, & N. Vallée (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology (Vol. 10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.