Strategy to improve quality for software applications: A process view

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 129-138

  Becker, Pablo ^a   Lew, Philip ^b   Olsina, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PAMPA   (Argentina)

^b BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

measurement and evaluation; process model; product improvement; quality in use; siqinu strategy

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL PROCESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CONTEXT-AWARE; GENERIC STRATEGIES; GOAL-ORIENTED; MULTI-PURPOSE; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS VIEW; PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES; PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY IN USE; SIQINU STRATEGY; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 79960589413     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1987875.1987897     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Basili, R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H. D. 1994. The goal question metric approach. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Vol. 1. 528-532.
2. Basili V., Lindvall M., Regardie M., Seaman C., Heidrich J., Munch J., Rombach D., Trendowicz A. 2010. Linking software development and business strategy through measurement. IEEE Computer, 43(4), 57-65.
3. Becker P., Olsina L. 2010. Towards Support Processes for Web Projects. In: LNCS 6385, Springer: Current Trends in Web Engineering - 10th International Conference on Web Engineering, ICWE 2010 Workshops, Daniel, Faca (Eds). Vienna, Austria, 102-113.
4. Bevan N. 2009. Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. Proceedings of HCI Int'l 2009. San Diego, California, USA.
5. CMMI Product Team. 2010. CMMI for Development Version 1.3 (CMMI-DEV, V.1.3) CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033, SEI Carnegie-Mellon University (Available on-line).
6. Covella G., Olsina L. 2006. Assessing Quality in Use in a Consistent Way. In ACM proceedings, Int'l Congress on Web Engineering, (ICWE'06), SF, USA, 1-8. (Pubitemid 46946788)
7. Curtis, B.; Kellner, M.; Over, J. 1992. Process Modelling, Comm. ACM 35 (9), 75-90.
8. ISO/IEC 14598-5. 1999. International Standard, Information technology - Software product evaluation - Part 5: Process for evaluators.
9. ISO/IEC 15939. 2002. Software Engineering - Software Measurement Process.
10. ISO/IEC 25000. 2005. Software Engineering - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE.
11. ISO/IEC FDIS 25010. 2011. Systems and software engineering. Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). System and software quality models.
12. Lew P., Olsina L., Zhang L. 2010. Quality, Quality in Use, Actual Usability and User Experience as Key Drivers for Web Application Evaluation, In: LNCS 6189, Springer, 10th Int'l Congress on Web Engineering (ICWE2010), Vienne, Austria, 218-232.
13. Molina, H., Olsina, L. 2008. Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Context Information Approach. IEEE CS, 8th Int'l Congress on Web Engineering, NY, US, 224-230.
14. Olsina L., Papa F., Molina H. 2008. How to Measure and Evaluate Web Applications in a Consistent Way. Ch. 13 in Springer book: Web Engineering: Modeling and Implementing Web Applications, Rossi, Pastor, Schwabe & Olsina (Eds), 385-420.
15. Olsina L., Rossi G., Garrido A., Distante D., Canfora G. 2008. Web Applications Refactoring and Evaluation: A Quality-Oriented Improvement Approach, Journal of Web Engineering, Rinton Press, US, 7 (4), 258-280.
16. SPEM. 2002. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification. Doc./02-11-14., Ver.1.0