Sociology of hyperlink networks of web 1.0, web 2.0, and twitter: A case study of South Korea

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 354-368

  Hsu, Chien leng ^a   Park, Woo Han ^a  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

blog; network analysis; politician; South Korea; Twitter; Web 1.0; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960582672     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439310382517     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ackland, R. (2005). Mapping the U.S. political blogosphere: Are conservative bloggers more prominent? Retrieved fromhttp://voson.anu.edu.au/papers/polblogs.pdf.
2. Ackland, R., & Gibson, R.K. (2004). Mapping political party network on the WWW. Paper presented at the Australian Electronic Governance Conference, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
3. Ackland, R., & Gibson, R.K. (2005). Mapping political party networks on the WWW. Retrieved fromhttp://voson.anu.edu.au/papers/far_right_political_networks.pdf.
4. Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election. Retrieved fromhttp://www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf.
5. Ali-Hasan, N., & Adamic, L.A. (2007). Expressing social relationships on the blog through links and comments. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.107.4956.
6. Bar-Ilan, J. (2005). Expectations versus reality-Search engine features needed for web research at mid-2005. Cybermetrics, 9. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v9i1p2.html.
7. Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in web 2.0. Sociological Research Online, 12. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html.
8. Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2001). Perspectives of webometrics. Scientometrics, 50, 65-82.
9. Brady, M. (2006). Blogs: Motivations behind the phenomenon (Chimera Working Paper 2006-17). Ipswich, UK: University of Essex.
10. Bruns, A. (2007). Methodologies for mapping the political blogosphere. First Monday, 12, http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_5/bruns/index.html.
11. Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of information exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5, 9-41.
12. Curran, K., Murray, M., & Christian, M. (2007). Taking the information to the public through library 2.0. Library Hi Tech, 25, 288-297.
13. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Drezner, D., & Farrell, H. (2004, September). The power and politics of blogs. Paper presented to the 2004 American Political Science Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL. Retrieved fromhttp://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/ farrell/blogpaperfinal.pdf.
15. Escher, T. (2007). The geography of (online) social networks. Presented in the conference of Towards a Social Science of Web 2.0, York, UK.
16. Farrall, K.N., & DelliCarpini, M.X. (2004). Cyberspace, the web graph and political deliberation on the Internet. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acs.upenn.edu/usr/kfarrall/P946GT.PDF.
17. Foot, K.A. (2006). Web sphere analysis and cybercultural studies. Retrieved fromhttp://faculty.washington.edu/kfoot/Publications/WSA-CybCultStudies-dist.pdf.
18. Foot, K.A., Schneider, S.M., Dougherty, M., Xenos, M., & Larsen, E. (2003). Analyzing linking practices: Candidate sites in the 2002 U.S. electoral web sphere. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/foot.html.
19. Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
20. Freeman, L. (2008). What is social network analysis? Retrieved fromhttp://www.insna.org/sna/what.html.
21. Garrido, M., & Halavais, A. (2003). Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement. In M. McCaughey, & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 165-184). London, England: Routledge.
22. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J.M., & Rogers, A. (2009). Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Retrieved fromhttp://hcil.c-s.umd.edu/trs/2009-32/2009-32.pdf.
23. Gruzd, A., Takhteyev, Y., & Wellman, B. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, Special issue on Imagined Communities.
24. Hague, R., & Uhm, S.Y. (2003). Online groups and offline parties: Korean politics and the Internet. In R. Gibson, P. Nixon, & S. Ward (Eds.), Political parties and the Internet: Net gain? (pp. 195-217). London, England: Routledge.
25. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html.
26. Haythornthwaite, C. (1999). A social network theory of tie strength and media use: a framework for evaluating multi-level impacts of new media. Technical Report UIUCLIS -2002/1+DKRC, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
27. Henzinger, M.R. (2001). Hyperlink analysis for the web. Retrieved fromhttp://maya.cs.depaul.edu/ classes/ds575/papers/hyperlink.pdf.
28. Hsu, C.L. (2008). Revealing virtual political networks: A webometric analysis of the Taiwanese pro-independence movement (Doctoral dissertation). Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
29. Jackson, N. (2007). Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 general election: Third time lucky? Internet Research, 17, 249-271.
30. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper presented to the Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop, San Jose, CA.
31. Kavanaugh, A., Reese, D., Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. The Information Society, 21, 119-131.
32. Kim, H.J. (2000). Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 887-899.
33. Kim, T.G. (2006). Korea leads world in Internet evolution to web 2.0. Asia Media Archives. Retrieved fromhttp://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=57036.
34. Kluver, R. (2007). The Internet and the expansion of political discussion in Singapore elections. In R. Davis, D. Taras, D. Owen, & S. Ward (Eds.), Making a difference (pp. 57-74). Lanham, MD: Lexington Publishers.
35. Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis. London, England: SAGE.
36. Lee, Y.O., & Park, H.W. (2008). When YouTube meets local politics: The 'BBK scandal' in the 2007 presidential election of South Korea. 2008 AoIR Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
37. Litchfield, J.A. (1999). Inequality: Methods and tools. Retrieved fromhttp://siteresources.worldbank.org/ INTPGI/Resources/Inequality/litchfie.pdf.
38. Marres, N., & Rogers, R. (2005). Recipe for tracing the fate of issues and their publics on the web. Retrieved fromhttp://www.govcom.org/publications/full_list/marres_rogers_makingthingspublic.pdf.
39. Miel, P., & Faris, R. (2008). News and information as digital media come of age. Retrieved fromhttp://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Overview_MR.pdf.
40. Nardi, B.A., Schiano, D.J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). "I'm blogging this": A closer look at why people blog. Retrieved fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.84.3216&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
41. Negroponte, N. (2000). Being digital. London, England: Vintage Books.
42. Noruzi, A. (2006). The web impact factor: a critical review. Electronic Library, 24, 490-500.
43. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved fromhttp://oreilly.com/lpt/a/6228.
44. Park, H.W., & Jankowski, N.W. (2008). A hyperlink network analysis of citizen blogs in South Korean politics. Javnost- The Public, 15, 57-74.
45. Park, H.W., & Kluver, R. (2009). Trends in online networking among South Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 505-515.
46. Park, H.W., Kim, C.S., & Barnett, G.A. (2004). Socio-communicational structural among political actors on the web in South Korea. New Media & Society, 6, 403-423.
47. Pavel, T. (2009). The power of 140 characters: Twitter in the Middle East. Tel Aviv Notes, July 26.
48. Richards, S. (2005). A social network analysis into the David Kelly tragedy. Connections, 26, 25-32.
49. Rogers, R. (2004). Information politics on the web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Schneider, S.M., & Foot, K.A. (2004). The web as an object of study. New Media & Society, 6, 114-122.
51. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London, England: SAGE.
52. Srivatsa, A., & Prakash, K. (2010). Twitter friend recommendation system. Retrieved fromhttp://users.ece.u-texas.edu/ asrivatsa/Report.pdf.
53. Stanyer, J. (2005). Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 general election: From web presence to e-campaigning? Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 1049-1065.
54. Steinberg, D. (1998). Korea: Triumph amid turmoil. Journal of Democracy, 9, 76-90.
55. Sunstein, C.R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Sunstein, C.R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Doubleday.
58. The Democratic Party. (n.d.). History of the Democratic Party. Retrieved fromhttp://englishdp.tistory.com/4.
59. Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
60. Thelwall, M. (2007). Blog searching: The first general-purpose source of retrospective public opinion in the social science? Online Information Review, 31, 277-289.
61. Tkach-Kawasaki, L., & Park, H.W. (2007). South Korean and Japanese politicians online. Paper presented at the 2007 AoIR Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
62. Vaughan, L., & Thelwall, M. (2004). Search engine coverage bias: Evidence and possible causes. Information Processing and Management, 40, 693-707.
63. Van den Bos, M. (2006). Hyperlinked Dutch-Iranian cyberspace. International Sociology, 49, 932-941.
64. Van den Bos, M., & Nell, L. (2006). Territorial bounds to virtual space. Global Networks, 6, 201-220.
65. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Williamson, A., & Phillips, N. (2009). Twitter: Communication tool or pointless vanity. Digital Papers, 2, Retrieved fromhttp://www.hansardsociety.org.uk.