A multi-paradigm modeling framework for energy systems simulation and analysis

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1725-1737

  Hodge, Bri Mathias S ^a   Huang, Shisheng ^a   Siirola, John D ^b   Pekny, Joseph F ^a   Reklaitis, Gintaras V ^a  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; Electricity systems; Energy systems modeling; Multi paradigm modeling

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED MODELING; CALIFORNIA; ELECTRICITY SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY SYSTEMS; ENERGY SYSTEM MODEL; ENERGY SYSTEMS; GAINING INSIGHTS; MODELING AND ANALYSIS; MODELING FORMALISMS; MULTI PARADIGM MODELING; OPEN FRAMEWORKS; SYSTEM COMPONENTS; TIME-SCALES; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; WORLD ENERGIES;

ENERGY POLICY;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 79960572851     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. AnyLogic V.6.4 2010, XJ Technologies.
2. Backus G. Fossil 1: A policy analysis model of the United States energy system 1977, Dartmouth University.
3. Bohringer C., Loschel A. Promoting renewable energy in Europe: A hybrid computable general equilibrium approach. The Energy Journal 2006, 135-150.
4. Bosetti V., Carraro C., Galeotti M., Massetti E., Tavoni M. WITCH: A world induced technical change hybrid model. The Energy Journal 2006, 13-38.
5. CAISO. (2010). California independent system operator (CAISO) open access same-time information system (OASIS). Folsom, CA.
6. de Lara J., Vangheluwe H. AToM3: A tool for multi-formalism and meta-modeling. The 5th international conference on fundamental approaches to software engineering 2002, R.-D. Kutsche, H. Weber (Eds.).
7. Demazeau Y. From interactions to collective behaviour in agent-based systems. The 1st European conference on cognitive science 1995, 117-132.
8. EC-TEEM Energy technology dynamics and advanced system model. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 2000, 14:1-4.
9. EIA Residential energy consumption survey 2005 2008, Energy Information Administration.
10. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2009 2009, Energy Information Administration.
11. EIA The implications of lower natural gas prices for the electric generation mix in the southeast 2009, DOE, Washington, DC.
12. EIA Electric power annual 2007 2009, Energy Information Administration.
13. Gabriel S., Kydes A., Whitman P. The national energy modeling system: A large-scale energy-economic equilibrium model. Operations Research 2001, 49(1):14-25.
14. Ghersi F., Hourcade J.-C. Macroeconomic consistency issues in E3 modeling: The continued fable of the elephant and the rabbit. The Energy Journal 2006, 39-62.
15. 2 emission reduction benefits of Chinese energy policies and environmental policies: A case study for Shanghai, period 1995-2020. Ecological Economics 2001, 39(2):257-270.
16. Hardebolle C., Boulanger F. Exploring multi-paradigm modeling techniques. Simulation 2009, 85(11/12):688-708.
17. Hodge B.-M., Huang S., Shukla A., Pekny J., Venkatasubramanian V., Reklaitis G.V.R. The effects of vehicle-to-grid systems on wind power integration in California. 20th European symposium on computer aided process engineering 2010, S. Pierucci, G. Buzzi Ferraris (Eds.).
18. Hodge, B.-M., Huang, S., Shukla, A., Pekny, J., Venkatasubramanian, V., Reklaitis, G. V. R. The effects of vehicle-to-grid systems on wind power integration. Wind Energy, submitted for publication.
19. Hodge B.-M.S., Pekny J.F., Reklaitis G.V. A multi-paradigm energy model for liquid natural gas analysis. 1st annual gas processing symposium 2009, 1-9. Elsevier, Qatar. H. Alfadala, G.V.R. Reklaitis, M.M. El-Halwagi (Eds.).
20. Hodge B.-M., Shukla A., Huang S., Reklaitis G.V.R., Venkatasubramanian V., Pekny J. A multi-paradigm simulation of the effects of PHEV adoption on electric utility usage levels and emissions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2011.
21. Huang S., Hodge B.-M., Pekny J., Reklaitis G.V. The impact of PHEV adoption on natural gas demand in electricity generation. 2nd annual gas processing symposium 2010, 257-265. Elsevier, Qatar. F. Benyahi, F.T. Eljack (Eds.).
22. Huang S., Hodge B.-M., Taheripour F., Pekny J., Tyner W., Reklaitis G.V.R. The effects of electricity pricing on PHEV competitiveness. Energy Policy 2011, 39(3):1552-1561.
23. IEA World Energy Outlook 2009 2009, International Energy Agency, Paris.
24. Jung Y., Blau G., Pekny J., Reklaitis G.V.R., Eversdyk D. Integrated safety stock management for multi-stage supply chain under production capacity constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2008, 32:2570-2581.
25. Kalagnanam J., Davenport A., Lee H. Computational aspects of clearing continuous call double auctions with assignment constraints and indivisible demand. IBM Research 2000, 1(3):221-238. 10.1023/A:1011589804040.
26. Kohler J., Barker T., Anderson D., Pan H. Combining energy technology dynamics and macroeconometrics: The E3MG model. The Energy Journal 2006, 113-134.
27. Laitner J., Hanson D. Modeling detailed energy-efficiency technologies and technology policies within a CGE framework. The Energy Journal 2006, 151-170.
28. Law A. Simulation modeling and analysis 2006, McGraw-Hill.
29. Loulou R., Goldstein G., Noble K. Documentation for the MARKAL family of models 2004, Energy Systems Technology Analysis Programme.
30. Miketa A., Schrattenholzer L. Experiments with a methodology to model the role of R&D expenditures in energy technology learning processes; first results. Energy Policy 2004, 32(15):1679-1692.
31. Moria, T. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). 1995. Thematic Guide to Integrated Assessment Modeling of Climate Change [online]. Palisades, NY: CIESIN. Available at [accessed DATE]. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/mva/iamcc.tg/TGHP.html.
32. Murphy F.H., Shaw S.H. The evolution of energy modeling at the federal energy administration and the energy information administration. Interfaces 1995, 25(5):173-193.
33. Naill R. A system dynamics model for national energy policy planning. System Dynamics Review 1992, 8(1):1-19.
34. Naughten B. Economic assessment of combined cycle gas turbines in Australia: Some effects of microeconomic reform and technological change. Energy Policy 2003, 31(3):225-245.
35. NERC Generating Availability Data System (GADS): Reports. http://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=4∥43∥47. Accessed 29.08.2010.
36. Paatero J.V., Lund P.D. A model for generating household electricity load profiles. International Journal of Energy Research 2006, 30(5):273-290.
37. Pfannenstiel J., Gessman J.L., Blevins B.B., White M.L., Garfield S., Walker C., et al. Integrated energy policy report 2007.
38. Repast Simphony 2010, Argonne National Laboratory.
39. Reynolds C.W. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model, in computer graphics. SIGGRAPH '87 1987, 25-34.
40. Ryden B., Johnsson J., Wene C.-O. CHP production in integrated energy systems examples from five Swedish communities. Energy Policy 1993, 21:176-190.
41. Sarjoughian H., Huang D. A multi-formalism modeling composability framework: Agent and discrete-event models. Ninth IEEE international symposium on distributed simulation and real-time applications 2005, 249-256.
42. Schafer A., Jacoby H. Experiments with a hybrid CGE-MARKAL model. The Energy Journal 2006, 171-178.
43. Sen S., Kothari D.P. Optimal thermal generating unit commitment: A review. Electrical Power & Energy Systems 1998, 20(7):443-451.
44. Simonoff J., Restrepo C., Zimmerman R. Risk-management and risk-analysis-based decision tools for attacks on electric power. Risk Analysis 2007, 27(3):547-570.
45. Stadler M., Kranzl L., Huber C., Haas R., Tsioliaridou E. Policy strategies and paths to promote sustainable energy systems-The dynamic Invert simulation tool. Energy Policy 2007, 35(1):597-608.
46. Sterman J.D. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world 2000, McGraw-Hill, p. 982.
47. Subramanian D., Pekny J., Reklaitis G.V.R. A simulation-optimization framework for addressing combinatorial and stochastic aspects of an R&D pipeline management problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2000, 24:1005-1011.
48. Vangheluwe H., de Lara J., Mosterman P. An introduction to multi-paradigm modelling and simulation. AIS' 2002 (AI, Simulation and Planning in High Autonomy Systems) 2002, 9-20.
49. Varma V., Blau G., Pekny J., Reklaitis G.V.R. A framework for addressing stochastic and combinatorial aspects of scheduling and resource allocation in pharmaceutical R&D pipelines. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2008, 32:1000-1015.
50. Vittorini V., Iacono M., Mazzocca N., Franceschinis G. The OsMoSys approach to multi-formalism modeling of systems. Software Systems Modeling 2004, 3(1):68-81.
51. Walras, M.-E.-L. (1874). Elements d'economie politique pure. Paris.
52. Wei Y.-M., Wu G., Fan Y., Liu L.-C. Progress in energy complex system modelling and analysis. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 2006, 25(1/2):109-128.
53. Wooldridge M., Jennings N. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 1995, 10(2):115-116.
54. Yang Z., Eckaus R., Ellerman A.D., Jacoby H.D. Jacoby: The MIT emissions prediction and policy analysis (EPPA) model 1996, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA, USA.
55. Zeigler B., Oren T. Multifacetted multiparadigm modeling perspectives: Tools for the '90's. 1986 winter simulation conference 1986, J. Wilson, J. Henriksen, S. Roberts (Eds.).