Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: A multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial

BMC Cancer

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Briez, Nicolas ^a,b   Piessen, Guillaume ^a,b   Bonnetain, Franck ^c   Brigand, Cécile ^d   Carrere, Nicolas ^e   Collet, Denis ^f   Doddoli, Christophe ^g   Flamein, Renaud ^h   Mabrut, Jean Yves ⁱ   Meunier, Bernard ^j   Msika, Simon ^k   Perniceni, Thierry ^l   Peschaud, Frédérique ^m   Prudhomme, Michel ⁿ   Triboulet, Jean Pierre ^a,b   Mariette, Christophe ^a,b  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

^c CENTRE GEORGES FRANÇOIS LECLERC   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

^e CHU PURPAN   (France)

^f Department of Digestive Surgery   (France)

^g HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF CLERMONT FERRAND   (France)

ⁱ CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^j PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^k Louis Mourrier University Hospital   (France)

^l INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

^m HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ   (France)

ⁿ NÎMES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagectomy; Randomised controlled trial; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC MOBILIZATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LUNG DISEASE; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OPEN STUDY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TRANSTHORACIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; STOMACH; THORACOTOMY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; ESOPHAGUS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH; THORACOTOMY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960564055     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-310     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol 2007, 8:545-53. 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70172-9, 17540306.
2. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, Wijnhoven BP, Tijssen JG, Fockens P, Stalmeier PF, ten Kate FJ, van Dekken H, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1662-9. 10.1056/NEJMoa022343, 12444180.
3. Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-esophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2007, 94:1461-7. 10.1002/bjs.6015, 17973268.
4. Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Decaluwé H, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D, Lerut T. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009, 35:13-20. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.024, 18952454.
5. Berger AC, Bloomenthal A, Weksler B, Evans N, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, Rosato EL. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2011, 212:560-6. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.042, 21463789.
6. Bresadola V, Terrosu G, Cojutti A, Benzoni E, Baracchini E, Bresadola F. Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006, 16:63-7. 10.1097/00129689-200604000-00001, 16773002.
7. Bernabe KQ, Bolton JS, Richardson WS. Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 2005, 19:334-7. 10.1007/s00464-004-8807-z, 15959707.
8. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 2000, 135:920-5. 10.1001/archsurg.135.8.920, 10922253.
9. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2007, 245:232-40. 10.1097/01.sla.0000225093.58071.c6, 1876975, 17245176.
10. Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, Sosef MN, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg 2011, 11:2. 10.1186/1471-2482-11-2, 3031195, 21226918.
11. D'journo XB, Michelet P, Avaro JP, Trousse D, Giudicelli R, Fuentes P, Doddoli C, Thomas P. Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy for cancer. Rev Mal Respir 2008, 25:683-94.
12. Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Berthoux L, Belghiti J. Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for oesophageal replacement. Br J Surg 1996, 83:540-2. 10.1002/bjs.1800830435, 8665254.
13. Bonavina L, Bona D, Binyom PR, Peracchia A. A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Res 2004, 117:52-7. 10.1016/j.jss.2003.11.007, 15013714.
14. Godiris-Petit G, Munoz-Bongrand N, Honigman I, Cattan P, Sarfati E. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization. World J Surg 2006, 30:1434-40. 10.1007/s00268-005-0627-3, 16850150.
15. Cense HA, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Results of the ecombination of open transthoracic esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric tube formation for esophageal cancer. Dig Surg 2006, 23:164-8. 10.1159/000094350, 16809915.
16. Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schroder W. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 2007, 245:241-6. 10.1097/01.sla.0000245847.40779.10, 1876980, 17245177.
17. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992, 111:518-26.
18. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 2010, New York: Wiley-Liss, 7.
19. Bonnetain F, Dahan L, Maillard E, Ychou M, Mitry E, Hammel P, Legoux JL, Rougier P, Bedenne L, Seitz JF. Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2010, 46:2753-62. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.023, 20724140.