Bi-objective optimization approach to the design and planning of supply chains: Economic versus environmental performances

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1454-1468

  Pinto Varela, Tânia ^a,b   Barbosa Póvoa, Ana Paula F D ^b   Novais, Augusto Q ^a  

^a LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE ENERGIA E GEOLOGIA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Economic versus environment performances; Fuzzy approach; Multi objective optimization

Indexed keywords

BI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN AND PLANNING; ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FUZZY APPROACH; FUZZY LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MIXED-INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PLANNING AND DESIGN; PROFIT MAXIMIZATION; SUPPLY CHAIN STRUCTURES;

DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; INVESTMENTS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; LOGISTICS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PROFITABILITY;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79960555754     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barbosa-Póvoa A. Sustainable supply chains. Computer aided chemical engineering 2009, Brazil, Elsevier, p. 127-132.
2. Bilgen B. Application of fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the production allocation and distribution supply chain network problem. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.062.
3. Bojarski A.D., Lainez J.M., Espuna A., Puigjaner L. Incorporating environmental impacts and regulations in a holistic supply chains modeling: An LCA approach. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2009, 33(10):1747-1759.
4. Duque J., Barbosa-Povoa A., Novais A.Q. Design and planning of sustainable industrial networks: Application to a recovery network of residual products. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2010, 49(9):4230-4248.
5. Geodkoop M., Spriensma R. The Eco-indicator 99. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment 2001, Pré Consultants B.V.
6. Grossmann I.E. Challenges in the new millennium: Product discovery and design, enterprise and supply chain optimization, global life cycle assessment. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2004, 29(1):29-39.
7. Guillen-Gosalbez G., Grossmann I. A global optimization strategy for the environmentally conscious design of chemical supply chains under uncertainty in the damage assessment model. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2010, 34(1):42-58.
8. Guillen-Gosalbez G., Grossmann I.E. Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AIChE Journal 2009, 55(1):99-121.
9. Hagelaae G., Van der Vorst J.G.A. Environmental supply chain management: Using life cycle assessment to structure supply chains. International Food and Agribusiness 2002, 4:399-412.
10. Hugo A., Pistikopoulos E.N. Environmentally conscious long-range planning and design of supply chain networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 2005, 13(15):1471-1491.
11. Hugo A., Rutter P., Pistikopoulos A., Amorelli G., Zoia Hydrogen infrastructures strategic planning using multi-objective optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30:1523-1534.
12. Melo M.T., Nickel S., Saldanha-da-Gama F. Facility location and supply chain management-A review. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196(2):401-412.
13. Ministry of Housing, S. Planning and a.t. Environment (1999). The Eco-Indicator 99. A damage oriented method for life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report 144.
14. Ministry of Housing, S. Planning and a.t. Environment (2000). Eco-Indicator 99, Manual for designers, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment 36.
15. Pantelides C.C. Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling, D.W.T. Proc. Second Conf. on Foundations of Computer Aided Operations 1994, CACHE Publications.
16. Papageorgiou L.G. Supply chain optimisation for the process industries: Advances and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2009, 33(12):1931-1938.
17. Peidro D., Mula J., Jiménez M., Botella M.d.M. A fuzzy programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 205:65-80.
18. Peidro D., Mula J., Poler R., Verdegay J.L. Fuzzy optimization f1 or supply chain planning under supply, demand and process uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2009, 160(18):2640-2657.
19. Pinto T., Barbosa-Povoa A., Novais A. Design of multipurpose batch plants: A comparative analysis between the STN, m-STN, and RTN representations and formulations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47(16):6025-6044.
20. PRéConsultants Eco-indicator 99 methodology report 2001, PRÉ Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, Netherlands.
21. Srivastava S.K. Green supply-chain management: A state of the art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews 2007, 91:53-80.
22. Tan R.R. Application of symmetric fuzzy linear programming in life cycle assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software 2005, 20(10):1343-1346.
23. Tan R.R., Culaba A.B., Aviso K.B. A fuzzy linear programming extension of the general matrix-based life cycle model. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008, 16(13):1358-1367.
24. Turkay M.C., Oruc K.F., Asakura T. Multi-company collaborative supply chain management with economical and environmental considerations. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2004, 28:985-992.
25. Zhou Z., Cheng S., Hua B. Supply chain optimization of continuous process industries with sustainability considerations. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2000, 24:1151-1158.
26. Zimmermann H.J. Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1978, 1:45-55.