Electronic health records and personal health records

Seminars in Oncology Nursing

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 218-228

  Caligtan, Christine A ^a   Dykes, Patricia C ^a  

^a PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication technology; Electronic health records; Information; Personal health records

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; PATIENT;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PATIENTS;

EID: 79960539961     PISSN: 07492081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Physician Resources: EMR Functionality Available at:, (accessed February, 2011). http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/physician-resources/16703.shtml.
2. VistA-Description Available at:, (accessed February, 2011). http://www.virec.research.va.gov/DataSourcesName/VISTA/VISTA.htm.
3. ISO Concept Database 2009 International Organization for Standardization, Available at:, (accessed February, 2011). https://cdb.iso.org/cdb/termentry!display.action?entry=435267%26language=1.
4. Kaiser Permanente HealthConnect Electronic Health Record Kaiser Permanente, Available at:, (accessed February, 2011). http://xnet.kp.org/newscenter/aboutkp/healthconnect/index.html.
5. Terms of Service Google Health, Available at:, (accessed February, 2011). http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/health/faq.html#storing.
6. Get the Whole HealthVault Story Microsoft HealthVault, Available at:, (accessed February 2011). http://www.healthvault.com/personal/hv_final_overview_master_02.pdf.
7. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2001, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
8. Electronic Health Records at a Glance Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Available at:, (accessed December, 2010). http://www.cms.gov/apps/media/press/factsheet.asp?Counter=3788&intNumPerPage=10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=1&numDays=3500&srchOpt=0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType=6&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date.
9. Kim H., Dykes P.C., Thomas D., et al. A closer look at nursing documentation on paper forms: preparation for computerizing a nursing documentation system. Comput Biol Med 2011, 41:182-189.
10. Byrne C.M., Mercincavage L.M., Pan E.C., et al. The value from investments in health information technology at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010, 29:629-638.
11. Siteman E., Businger A., Gandhi T., et al. Clinicians recognize value of patient review of their electronic health record data. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006, 1101.
12. Partners Electronic Health Record Earns Federally-Recognized Certification Partners Healthcare, Available at:, (accessed March, 2011). http://www.partners.org/newnoteworthy/lmr.htm.
13. By the Numbers. Top vendors of acute-care EHR systems Himss analytics, (accessed March 2011). http://www.modernhealthcare.com/section/lists/?djoPage=product_details&Category=LISTS&Profile=&djoPid=9647&djoPY=@pL0v8.e1JAFo.
14. Adams K., Freiner A.C., Corrigan J.M. First annual crossing the quality chasm summit 2004, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 1st ed.
15. Nursing Informatics for the 21st Century: An international look at practice, education, and EHR trends 2010, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), Chicago, IL. 2nd ed. C.A. Weaver, C.W. Delaney, P. Weber, R. Carr (Eds.).
16. Blumenthal D., Tavener M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:501-504.
17. Buntin M.B., Burke M.F., Hoaglin M.C., et al. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2011, 30:464-471.
18. Jha A.K., DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1628-1638.
19. Zhou L., Soran C.S., Jenter C.A., et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:457-464.
20. Poon E.G., Wright A., Simon S.R., et al. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Medical Care 2010, 48:203-209.
21. Kaelber D., Pan E.C. The value of personal health record (PHR) systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008, 6:343-347.
22. Johnston D., Kaelber D., Pan E.C., et al. A framework and approach for assessing the value of personal health records (PHRs). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007, 2007:374-378.
23. Tang P.C., Ash J.S., Bates D.W., et al. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13:121-126.
24. Wuerdeman L., Volk L., Pizziferri L., et al. How accurate is information that patients contribute to their electronic health record?. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005, 2005:834-838.
25. Zickuhr K. Generations online in 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Available at: (accessed November, 2010). http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Generations-2010/Overview.aspx.
26. Smith A. Home broadband 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. August 11, 2010. Available at: (accessed November, 2010). http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/Home%20broadband%202010.pdf.
27. " Top ten" most useful consumer health websites Medical Library Association, Available at:, (accessed March, 2011). http://www.mlanet.org/resources/userguide.html#5.
28. Cancer topics National Cancer Institute, Available at:, (accessed March, 2011). http://www.cancer.gov/.
29. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition 2005, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. M. Hewitt, S. Greenfield, E. Stovall (Eds.).
30. Deloitte. 2008 survey of health care consumers: executive summary 2008, Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, Washington, DC.
31. Basch E., Artz D., Iasonos A., et al. Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007, 14:264-268.
32. Abernethy A.P., Herndon J.E., Wheeler J.L., et al. Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009, 37:1027-1038.
33. Green B.B., Cook A.J., Ralston J.D., et al. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008, 299:2857-2867.
34. Green B.B., Ralston J.D., Fishman P.A., et al. Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework. Contemp Clin Trials 2008, 29:376-395.
35. Liddy C., Dusseault J.J., Dahrouge S., et al. Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study. Can Fam Physician 2008, 54:58-65.
36. Hassol A., Walker J.M., Kidder D., et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11:505-513.
37. Ralston J.D., Carrell D., Reid R., et al. Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007, 14:798-806.
38. Schnipper J.L., Gandhi T.K., Wald J.S., et al. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an electronic health record designed to improve medication safety: the Patient Gateway medications module. Inform Prim Care 2008, 16:147-155.
39. Adamson S.C., Bachman J.W. Pilot study of providing online care in a primary care setting. Mayo Clin Proc 2010, 85:704-710.
40. Matheny M.E., Gandhi T.K., Orav E.J., et al. Impact of an automated test results management system on patients' satisfaction about test result communication. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:2233-2239.
41. Lin C.T., Wittevrongel L., Moore L., et al. An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2005, 7(4):e47.
42. Personal health information management: tools and strategies for citizens' engagement. Paper presented at Post-Congress Workshop of the 10th International Nursing Informatics Congress - NI 2009; July 1-4, 2009, Vanajanlinna, Finland.
43. Wald JS. Patient Gateway: A Secure Patient Portal at Partners Healthcare. Available at: (accessed November, 2010). http://www.rmf.harvard.edu/files/documents/events/HealthcareIT08/Wald.ppt.
44. Grant R.W., Wald J.S., Poon E.G., et al. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an ambulatory care electronic health record: patient gateway for diabetes collaborative care. Diabetes Technol Ther 2006, 8:576-586.
45. Personal health information management: tools and strategies for citizens' engagement 2009, Kuopio University Library, Kupio. K. Saranto, P.F. Brennan, A. Casey (Eds.).
46. Dykes P.C., Cook R., Currie L., et al. Integrating personal health information management systems into clinical practice. Personal health information management: tools and strategies for citizens' engagement 2009, 68-82. Kuopio University Library, Kupio. K. Saranto, P.F. Brennan, A. Casey (Eds.).
47. Teperi J., Porter M.E., Vuorenkoski L., et al. The Finnish health care system: a value-based perspective. Helsinki: Sitra Reports 2009, 82.
48. Henderson V. Preserving the art of nursing in a technological age. Nurs Times 1979, 75(48):245-260.