Can Critical Education Research Be “Quantitative”?

The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 465-481

  Ferrare, Joseph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960530918     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203882993-41     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending general linear reality. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 169-186.
2. Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149-1182.
3. Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of discovery. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
5. Apple, M. W. (1979/2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
6. Au, Wayne. (2008). Unequal by design. New York: Routledge.
7. Bachelard, G. (2002). The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester, England: Clinamen Press.
8. Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., and Galbraith, J. I. (2002). The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
9. Bernstein, B. B. (1977). Class, codes and control (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10. Blasius, J. (1994). Correspondence analysis in social science research. In M. Greenacre and J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences (pp. 23-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. (1990). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., and Chamboredon, J.-C. (1991). The craft of sociology. New York: Verlag Walter de Gruyter.
18. Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
19. Bradley, I., and Meek, R. L. (1986). Matrices and society. New York: Viking Penguin.
20. Breiger, R. (2000). A tool kit for practice theory. Poetics, 27, 91-115.
21. Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Carspecken, P. F., and Apple, M. (1992). Critical qualitative research. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, and J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 507-553). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), S95-S120.
24. Davis, J., Smith, T., and Marsden, P. (2004). General social surveys, 1972-2004 (Cumulative File).
25. Downey, D., Hippel, P. T. V., and Broh, B. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 613-635.
26. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
27. Emirbayer, M., and Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. The American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.
28. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies (2nd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
29. Greenacre, M. (1994). Correspondence analysis and its interpretation. In M. Greenacre and J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences (pp. 3-22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Greenacre, M., and Blasius, J. (Eds.). (1994). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Horvat, E., Weininger, E., and Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319-351.
32. Kruskal, J. B., and Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
33. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34. Mandelbrot, B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
35. Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? The American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1-49.
36. McLean, P. D. (2007). The art of the network. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37. McNeil, L. M. (2005). Faking equity. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind. Albany: State University of New York Press.
38. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
39. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
40. Snijders, T., and Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis. London: Sage.
41. Song, M., and Miskel, C. (2005). Who are the influentials? A cross-state social network analysis of the reading policy domain. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 7-48.
42. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
44. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Whitty, G. (1985). Sociology and school knowledge. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
46. Young, M. F. D. (1971). Knowledge and control. London: Collier-Macmillan.