Soil spiders in differing environments: Eucalyptus plantations and grasslands in the Pampa biome, southern Brazil;Arañas del suelo en ambientes diferentes: Plantaciones de Eucalyptus y pasturas en el bioma de Pampa, sur de Brasil

Revista Colombiana de Entomologia

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 277-284

  Rodrigues, Everton Nei Lopes ^a,b   Mendonça Jr , Milton de S ^a   Rosado, João L O ^c   Loeck, Alci E ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b FUNDAÇÃO ZOOBOTÂNICA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Araneae; Monoculture; Richness; Rio Grande do Sul

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; EUCALYPTUS; LINYPHIIDAE; SALTICIDAE;

EID: 79960515048     PISSN: 01200488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BECK, L.; HÖFER, H.; MARTIUS, C.; RÖMBKE, J.; VERHAGH, M. 1997. Bodenbiologie tropischer Regenwälder. Geogrephische Rundschau 49(1): 24-31.
2. BIRD, S. D.; COULSON, R. N.; FISHER, R. F. 2004. Changes in soil and litter arthropod abundance following tree harvesting and site preparation in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation. Forest Ecology and Management 202: 195-208.
3. BULTMAN, T. L.; UETZ, G. W. 1982. Abundance and community structure of forest floor spider following litter manipulation. Oecologia 55: 34-41.
4. COLWEL, R. K. 2005. Estimate S: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5.1. University of Connecticut, USA. Available at: .
5. CLARKE, K. R.; WARWICK, R. M. 1994. Change in Marine Communities. UK, National Research Concil. 144 p.
6. FEREIRA, R. L.; MAR QUES, M. M. G. S. M. 1998. A fauna de artrópodes de serapilheira de áreas de monocultura com Eucalyptus sp. e mata secundária heterogênea. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 27(3): 359-403.
7. FOELI X, R. F. 1996. Biology of spiders. New York, Oxford University Press. 336p.
8. HAMER, O.; HARPER, D. A. T. 2009. Past: Paleontological Statistics. Version 1.97. Available at: .
9. HÖFER, H.; BRESCOVIT, A. D. 2001. Species and guild structure of a Neotropical spider assemblage (Araneae) (Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil). Andrias 15: 99-120.
10. HÖFER, H.; MARTIUS, C.; BECK, L. 1996. Decomposition in an Amazonian rainforest after experimental litter addition in small plots. Pedobiologia 40: 70-576.
11. IBGE, 2004. Mapa de Biomas do Brasil, primeira aproximação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Available at: .
12. LIMA, W. P. 1993. Impacto ambiental do eucalipto. 2ed. São Paulo, Editora da Universidade de São Paulo. 302 p.
13. LO-MAN-HUNG, N. F.; GARDNER, T. A.; RIBEIRO-JÚNIOR, M. A.; BARLOW, J.; BONALDO, A. B. 2008. The value of primary, secondary, and plantation forests for Neotropical epigeic arachnids. Journal of Arachnology 36: 394-401.
14. MAJER, J. D.; RECHER, H. F. 1999. Are eucalypts Braziĺs friend or foe? An entomological viewpoint. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 28(2): 185-200.
15. MAY, R. M. 1986. The search for patterns in the balance of nature: Advances and retreats. Ecology 67: 1115-1126.
16. MOÇO, M. K. S.; GAMA-RODRIGUES, E. F.; GAMA-RODRI GUES, A. C.; COREIA, M. E. F. 2005. Caracterização da fauna edáfica em diferentes coberturas vegetais na região norte fluminense. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 29: 555-564.
17. NYFELER, M.; STERLING, W. L.; DEAN, D. 1994. A Insetivorous activities of spiders in United States field crops. Journal of Applied Entomology 118: 113-128.
18. PELENS, R.; GARAY, I. 2000. Edaphic macroarthropod communities in fast-growing plantations of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maid (Myrtaceae) and Acacia mangium Wild (Leguminosae) in Brazil. European Journal of Soil Biology 35: 77-89.
19. PILAR, V. P.; MÜLLER, S. C.; CASTILHOS, Z. M. S.; JAC QUES, A. V. A. 2009. Campos Sulinos-conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade. Brasília, MMA. 403 p.
20. PLAGENS, M. J. 1983. Population of Misumenops (Araneida: Thomisidae) in two Arizona cotton fields. Environmental Entomology 12: 572-575.
21. PRIMACK, R.; RODRIGUES, E. 2002. Biologia da conservação. Londrina, Editora Planta. viii+328p.
22. RINALDI, I. M. P. 2005. Spiders of a young plantation of eucalypt: diversity and potential predator of the most frequent arboreal species. Acta Biológica Paranaense 34: 1-13.
23. RODRIGUES, E. N. L.; MENDONÇA, JR., M. S.; OTT, R. 2009. Spider diversity in a rice agroecosystem and adjacent areas in southern Brazil. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 35(1): 78-86.
24. RYPSTRA, A. L.; CARTER, P. E; BALFOURD, R. A.; MAR SHAL, S. D. 1999. Architectural features of agricultural habitats and their impact on the spiders inhabitants. Journal of Arachnology 27: 371-377.
25. SOUZA, A. L. T. 2007. Influência da estrutura do habitat na abundância e diversidade de aranhas. In: Gonzaga, M. O.; Santos, A. J.; Japyas ú, H. F. eds. Ecologia e comportamento de aranhas. Rio de Janeiro, Interciência Editora, p.25-44.
26. TOTI, D. S.; COYLE, F. A.; MILER, J. A. 2000. A structured inventory of Appalachian Grass Bald and Heath Bald spider assemblages and a test of species richness estimator performance. Journal of Arachnology 28: 329-345.
27. UETZ, G. W. 1979. The influence of variation in litter habitats on spider communities. Oecologia 40: 29-42.
28. UETZ, G. W.; HALAJ, J.; CADY, A. B. 1999. Guild structure of spiders in major crops. Journal of Arachnology 27: 270-280. Whitmore, C.; Slotow, R.; Crouch, T. E.; Dipernar-
29. WHITMORE, C.; SLOTOW, R.; CROUCH, T. E; DIPERNAR-SCHOEMAN, A. S. 2002. Diversity of spiders (Araneae) in a savanna reserve, Northern Province, South Africa. Journal of Arachnology 30: 344-356.
30. WILCO X, B. A.; MURPHY, D. D. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of the fragmentation on extinction. The American Naturalist 125: 879-887.
31. WISE, D. H. 1993. Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. xiii+328p.
32. YOUNG, O. P.; EDWARDS, G. B. 1990. Spiders in United States field crops and their potential effect on crop pests. Journal of Arachnology 18(1): 1-27.