Accuracy of GFR predictive equations using ID-MS traceable creatinine: Compensated Jaffe and enzymatic

Clinical Laboratory

Volumn 57, Issue 5-6, 2011, Pages 357-361

  Bargnoux, Anne Sophie ^a,b   Simon, Noémie ^a   Garrigue, Valérie ^a   Dupuy, Anne Marie ^a   Badiou, Stéphanie ^a,b   Mourad, Georges ^a   Cristol, Jean Paul ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Enzymatic creatinine; GFR; Jaffe compensated creatinine; Renal transplantation

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; PENTETATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENZYMATIC ASSAY; ENZYMATIC CREATININE METHOD; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOTOPE DILUTION ASSAY; JAFFE CREATININE METHOD; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; COLORIMETRY; CREATININE; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOISOTOPE DILUTION TECHNIQUE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TECHNETIUM TC 99M PENTETATE;

EID: 79960471140     PISSN: 14336510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005;67:2089-100. (Pubitemid 41623371)
2. Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Veys N, et al. The importance of standardization of creatinine in the implementation of guidelines and recommendations for CKD: implications for CKD management programmes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:77-83. (Pubitemid 43057113)
3. Delanghe JR, Cobbaert C, Galteau MM, et al. Trueness verification of actual creatinine assays in the European market demonstrates a disappointing variability that needs substantial improvement. An international study in the framework of the EC4 creatinine standardization working group. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1319-25.
4. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130: 461-70. (Pubitemid 29135798)
5. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem 2006;52:5-18. (Pubitemid 43032461)
6. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Expressing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem 2007;53:766-72. (Pubitemid 46580250)
7. Panteghini M; IFCC Scientific Division. Enzymatic assays for creatinine: time for action. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:567-72.
8. Cobbaert CM, Baadenhuijsen H, Weykamp CW. Prime time for enzymatic creatinine methods in pediatrics. Clin Chem 2009;55: 549-58.
9. Badiou S, Dupuy AM, Descomps B, Cristol JP. Comparison between the enzymatic vitros assay for creatinine determination and three other methods adapted on the Olympus analyzer. J Clin Lab Anal 2003;17:235-40. (Pubitemid 37523315)
10. Vetromile F, Szwarc I, Garrigue V, et al. Early high pulse pressure is associated with graft dysfunction and predicts poor kidney allograft survival. Transplantation 2009;88:1088-94.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-60. (Pubitemid 29425900)
12. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2009;9:S1-155.
13. Parry DM. Use of single-value protein compensation of the Jaffe creatinine assay contributes to clinically significant inaccuracy in results. Clin Chem 2008;54:215-6. (Pubitemid 351182620)
14. Vickery S, Stevens PE, Dalton RN, van Lente F, Lamb EJ. Does the ID-MS traceable MDRD equation work and is it suitable for use with compensated Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine assays? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2439-45.
15. Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Kerry A, et al. Different methods of creatinine measurement significantly affect MELD scores. Liver Transpl 2007;13:523-9. (Pubitemid 46605854)