Mammographic features are associated with clinicopathological characteristics in invasive breast cancer

Anticancer Research

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2327-2334

  Jiang, Liyu ^a   Ma, Tingting ^a   Moran, Meena S ^b   Kong, Xiaoli ^a   Li, Xiaoyan ^a   Haffty, Bruce G ^c,d   Yang, Qifeng ^a,c,d,e  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^e NONE   (China)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Calcification; Mammography; Prognostic factor

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; CALCIFICATION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MENARCHE; MENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79960459108     PISSN: 02507005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Coughlin SS and Ekwueme DU: Breast cancer as a global health concern. Cancer Epidemiol 33(5): 315-318, 2009.
2. Breast cancer in developing countries. Lancet 374(9701): 1567, 2009.
3. Wang QJ, Zhu WX, Xing XM: Analysis of the incidence and survival of female breast cancer in Beijing during the last 20 years. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 28(3): 208-210, 2006.
4. Yang TJ, Yang Q, Haffty BG and Moran MS: Prognosis for mammographically occult, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(1): 79-84, 2010.
5. Memis A, Ozdemir N, Parildar M, Ustun EE and Erhan Y: Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: mammographic and US features with histologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 35(1): 39-43, 2000. (Pubitemid 30621420)
6. Matsuda M, Yoshimoto M, Iwase T, Takahashi K, Kasumi F, Akiyama F and Sakamoto G: Mammographic and clinicopathological features of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer 7(1): 65-70, 2000.
7. Goodman DN, Boutross-Tadross O and Jong RA: Mammographic features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast with pathological correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J 46(4): 296-301, 1995.
8. Gunhan-Bilgen I and Oktay A: Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, clinical and pathologic findings. Eur J Radiol 61(1): 158-162, 2007. (Pubitemid 46038020)
9. Daniele S, Imbriaco M, Riccardi A, Selva G, di Nuzzo L, Salvatore M and Sodano A: Mammographic and sonographic features of tubular breast carcinoma. Tumori 89(4): 417-20, 2003. (Pubitemid 37279926)
10. Leibman AJ, Lewis M and Kruse B: Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(2): 263-265, 1993. (Pubitemid 23059208)
11. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ and Floyd CE Jr.: Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(4): 773-778, 1996.
12. Le Doussal V, Tubiana-Hulin M, Friedman S, Hacene K, Spyratos F and Brunet M: Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR). An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer 64(9): 1914-1921, 1989.
13. Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, Bassett LW, Berry D, Bland KI, Borgen PI, Clark G, Edge SB, Hayes DF, Hughes LL, Hutter RV, Morrow M, Page DL, Recht A, Theriault RL, Thor A, Weaver DL, Wieand HS and Greene FL: Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(17): 3628-3636, 2002. (Pubitemid 34983222)
14. Faverly DR, Hendriks JH and Holland R: Breast carcinomas of limited extent: frequency, radiologie-pathologie characteristics, and surgical margin requirements. Cancer 91(4): 647-659, 2001. (Pubitemid 32173287)
15. Kollias J, Gill PG, Beamond B, Rossi H, Langlois S and Vernon-Roberts E: Clinical and radiological predictors of complete excision in breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 68(10): 702-706, 1998. (Pubitemid 28435050)
16. Lam PB, Vacek PM, Geller BM and Muss HB: The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont. Cancer 89(2): 369-375, 2000. (Pubitemid 30489886)
17. Vacek PM and Geller BM: A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(5): 715-722, 2004. (Pubitemid 38737858)
18. Alowami S, Troup S, Al-Haddad S, Kirkpatrick I and Watson PH: Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression. Breast Cancer Res 5(5): R129-135, 2003.
19. Byrne C, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Pollak M and Hankinson SE: Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. Cancer Res 60(14): 3744-3748, 2000.
20. Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, Key CR and Linver MN: Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology 209(2): 511-518, 1998. (Pubitemid 28503121)
21. Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Burrell HC, James JJ, Lee AH and Chakrabarti J: Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(3): 676-683, 2007.
22. Ildefonso C, Vazquez J, Guinea O, Perez A, Fernandez A, Corte MD, Junquera S, Gonzalez LO, Pravia P, Garcia-Moran M and Vizoso FJ: The mammographic appearance of breast carcinomas of invasive ductal type: relationship with clinicopathological parameters, biological features and prognosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136(2): 224-231, 2008. (Pubitemid 351173443)
23. Liapis H, Crouch EC, Grosso LE, Kitazawa S and Wick MR: Expression of parathyroid-like protein in normal, proliferative, and neoplastic human breast tissues. Am J Pathol 143(4): 1169-1178, 1993.
24. Zunzunegui RG, Chung MA, Oruwari J, Golding D, Marchant DJ and Cady B: Casting-type calcifications with invasion and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a more aggressive disease? Arch Surg 138(5): 537-540, 2003.
25. Wang X, Chao L, Chen L, Tian B, Ma G, Zang Y, Hua M and Sun J: Correlation of mammographic calcifications with Her-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinomas. J Digit Imaging 21(2): 170-176, 2008.
26. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Hermann G, de Csepel J, Estabrook A and Rademaker AW: Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Ann Surg 235(2): 246-251, 2002. (Pubitemid 34111954)
27. Thurfjell E, Thurfjell MG and Lindgren A: Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1-9 mm invasive breast cancers. Worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone. Breast Cancer Res Treat 67(2): 177-180, 2001.
28. Alexander MC, Yankaskas BC and Biesemier KW: Association of stellate mammographic pattern with survival in small invasive breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(1): 29-37, 2006. (Pubitemid 46100141)
29. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ, Ellis IO and Cornford E: Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5): 1377-1380, 2006.