Indexical information, encoding difficulty, and second language vocabulary learning

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 417-434

  Sommers, Mitchell S ^a   Barcroft, Joe ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960426060     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716410000469     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barcroft, J. (2001). Acoustic variation and lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 563-590.
2. Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M. S. (2005). Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 3, 387-414. (Pubitemid 43298384)
3. Goh, W. D. (2005). Talker variability and recognition memory: Instance-specific and voice-specific effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 40-53. (Pubitemid 40145042)
4. Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Effects of talker variability on self-paced serial recall. research on speech perception (Progress Report No. 16, pp. 313-326). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
5. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279. (Pubitemid 128457847)
6. Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Logan, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 152-162.
7. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 5521-2421.
8. Macht, M. M., & Buschke, H. (1983). Age differences in cognitive effort in recall. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 695-700.
9. Martin, C. S., Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Summers, W. V. (1989). Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 4, 676-684.
10. Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378. (Pubitemid 19041133)
11. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1995). Effects of stimulus variability on perception and representation of spoken words in memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 989-1001.
12. Palmeri, T. J.,Goldinger, S. D.,&Pisoni,D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognitionmemory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 19, 309-328.
13. Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Long-termmemory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning. Speech Communication, 13, 109-125.
14. Roediger, H. L., Gallo, D. A., and Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319-322.
15. Rost, G. C., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12, 339-349.
16. Singh, L. (2008). Influences of high and low variability on infant word recognition. Cognition, 106, 833-870. (Pubitemid 350265866)
17. Sommers, M. S., & Barcroft, J. (2006). Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: Effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification. Journal of the American Acoustical Society 119, 2406-2416.
18. Sommers, M. S., & Barcroft, J. (2007). An integrated account of the effects of acoustic variability in first language and second language: Evidence from amplitude, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 231-249.
19. Sommers, M. S., Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. I. Effects of variability in speaking rate and overall amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 1314-1324. (Pubitemid 24286284)