Geovisual evaluation of public participation in decision making: The grapevine

Journal of Visual Languages and Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 305-321

  Aguirre, Robert ^a   Nyerges, Timothy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Geovisual analytics; Grapevine; Human computer human interaction; Public participation; Spatio temporal events

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960421146     PISSN: 1045926X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. National Research Council Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society 1996, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
2. National Research Council Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities 2005, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
3. National Research Council Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making 2008, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
4. Nyerges T. Scaling-up as a grand challenge for public participation GIS. Directions Magazine 2005, 〈www.directionsmag.com〉.
5. Nyerges T., Jankowski P., Tuthill D., Ramsey K. Participatory GIS support for collaborative water resource decision making: results of a field experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006, 96(4):699-725.
6. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. J. Gastil, P. Levine (Eds.).
7. Digital Future Report, 2010, http://www.digitalcenter.org.
8. Let's Improve Transportation, 2007, http://www.letsimprovetransportation.org.
9. Cook D.T., Campbell D.T. Quasi-experimental Design: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings 1979, Rand McNally, Skokie, IL.
10. Brinberg D., McGrath J. Validity and the Research Process 1985, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
11. J.A. Konstan, Y. Chen, Online field experiments: lessons from CommunityLab, in: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on e-Social Science Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007.
12. National Research Council Learning to Think Spatially 2006, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
13. von Eye A. Configural Frequency Analysis-A Program for 32 Bit Windows Operating Systems Program Manual 2008, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
14. Sanderson P., Fisher C. Exploratory sequential data analysis: foundations. Human-Computer Interaction 1994, 9:251-317.
15. van der Aalst W., van Dongen B., Herbst J., Maruster L., Schimm G., Weijters A. Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data and Knowledge Engineering 2003, 47(2):237-267.
16. van der Aalst W., Reijers H.A., Song M. Discovering social networks from event logs. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2005, 14:549-593.
17. Andrienko N., Andrienko G., Gatalsky P. Exploratory spatio-temporal visualization: an analytical review. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 2003, 14(6):503-541.
18. Hewagamage K.P., Hirakawa M. An interactive visual language for spatiotemporal patterns. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 2001, 12(3):325-349.
19. Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?. Papers of the Regional Science Association 1970, 24:6-21.
20. Kwan M.P. Time, information technologies and the geographies of everyday life. Urban Geography 2002, 23:471-482.
21. Kwan M.P. Feminist visualization: re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2002, 92:645-661.
22. 2007, Springer Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. H.J. Miller (Ed.).
23. Yu H., Shaw S.-L. Revisiting Hägerstrand's time-geographic framework for individual activities in the age of instant access. Societies and Cities in the Age of Instant Access 2007, 103-118. Springer Science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. H.J. Miller (Ed.).
24. Getis A. A method for the study of sequences in geography. Papers of the Regional Science Association 1966, 87-92.
25. Magnusson M.S. Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2000, 32(1):93-110.
26. Olson G., Herbsleb M.J.D., Rueter H.H. Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques. Human-Computer Interaction 1994, 9(3/4):427-472.
27. Nyerges T., Moore T.J., Montejano R., Compton M. Interaction coding systems for studying the use of groupware. Human-Computer Interaction 1998, 13(2):127-165.
28. Gray W.D., Boehm-Davis D.A. Milliseconds matter: an introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2000, 6(4):322-335.
29. P. Sanderson, Release notes for MacSHAPA 1.0.3, Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center (CSERIAC), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1995.
30. Jankowski P., Nyerges T. GIS-supported collaborative decision making: results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2001, 91(1):48-70.
31. MacEachren A. Moving geovisualization toward support for group work. Exploring Geovisualization 2005, 445-461. Elsevier. J. Dykes, J.A. MacEachren, M.J. Kraak (Eds.).
32. Haug D., MacEachren A.M., Hardisty F. The challenge of analyzing geovisualization tool use: taking a visual approach 2001, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
33. S. Tanimoto, S. Hubbard, W. Winn, Automatic textual feedback for guided inquiry learning, in: Proceedings of the International Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) Society Conference, 2005.
34. Keel P. EWall: a visual analytics environment for collaborative sense-making. Information Visualization 2007, 6:48-63.
35. Zook M., Dodge M., Aoyama Y. New digital geographies: information, communication, and place. Geography and Technology 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. S. Brunn, S.L. Cutter, J.W. Harrington (Eds.).
36. Wallace R. A fractal model of HIV transmission on complex sociogeographic networks: towards analysis of large data sets. Environment and Planning A 1993, 25:137-148.
37. Hedley N.R., Lee A., Drew C.H., Arfin E. Hagerstrand revisited: interactive space-time visualizations of complex spatial data. Informatica 1999, 23(2):155-168.
38. Pred A. Structuration, biography formation, and knowledge: observations on port growth during the late mercantile period. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 1984, 2(3):251-275.
39. Gudmundsson J.M., van Kreveld M., Speckmann B. Efficient detection of motion patterns in spatio-temporal data sets, Technical report UU-CS-2005-044 2005, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University.
40. Worboys M. Event-oriented approaches to geographic phenomena. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(1):1-28.
41. M. Worboys, K. Hornsby, From objects to events: GEM, the geospatial event model, in: Proceedings, Geographic Information Science 2004, Springer Verlag, Adelphi, MD, 2004, pp. 327-344.
42. Peuquet D.J., Duan N. An event-based spatiotemporal data model (ESTDM) for temporal analysis of geographical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1995, 9(1):7-24.
43. Yuan M., Hornsby K.S. Computation and Visualization for Understanding Dynamics in Geographic Domains: a Research Agenda 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
44. Hornsby K.S., Yuan M. Understanding dynamics of geographic domains 2008, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
45. Card S.K., Mackinlay J.D., Shneiderman B. Information visualization: using vision to think 1998, Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
46. 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York. R.E. Mayer (Ed.).
47. D. Billman, G. Convertino, J. Shrager, J.P. Massar, P. Pirolli, Collaborative intelligence analysis with CACHE and its effects on information gathering and cognitive bias, Palo Alto Research Center, Paper presented at the Human Computer Interaction Consortium Workshop, Snow Mountain, CO, 2006.
48. C. Steinitz, On scale and complexity and the needs for spatial analysis, Paper Presented at Spatial Concepts in GIS and Design, 2008, http://ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/scdg.
49. Contractor N.S., Siebold D.S. Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research 1993, 19(4):528-563.
50. Kendall M.G., Smith B.B. The problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1939, 10(3):275-287.
51. Connexor, 2008, http://www.connexor.eu.
52. Mark D.M. Spatial representation: a cognitive view. Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications 1999, Wiley, New York. 2nd Edition. D.J. Maguire, M.F. Goodchild, D.W. Rhind, P. Longley (Eds.).
53. Mark D.M., Skupin A., Smith B. Features, objects, and other things: ontological distinctions in the geographic domain. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2001, 2205:488-502.
54. Thomas J.J., Cook K.A. Illuminating the Path: the Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics 2005, National Visualization and Analytics Center, Richland, WA.
55. Andrienko G., Andrienko N., Jankowski P., Keim D., Kraak M.-J., MacEachren A., Wrobel S. Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2007, 21(8):839-857.
56. A. MacEachren, M. Gahegan, W. Pike, Visualization for constructing and sharing geo-scientific concepts, PNAS Early Edition, 2003.
57. Hundhausen C.D. Using end-user visualization environments to mediate conversations: a 'Communicative Dimensions' framework. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 2005, 16(3):153-185.
58. Compieta P., Di Martino S., Bertolotto M., Ferrucci F., Kechadi T. Exploratory spatio-temporal data mining and visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 2007, 18(3):255-279.
59. R. Kingston, Public participation GIS and the internet, in: T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, R. McMaster (Eds.), Handbook of GIS and Society Research, Sage Publications, London, forthcoming.