Effect of DEM mesh size on AnnAGNPS simulation and slope correction

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 179, Issue 1-4, 2011, Pages 267-277

  Wang, Xiaoyan ^a   Lin, Q ^b  

^a CAPITAL NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

AnnAGNPS simulation; DEM resolution; Nonpoint source pollution loading; Slope correction; Terrain attributes

Indexed keywords

ANNAGNPS SIMULATION; DEM RESOLUTION; NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION; SLOPE CORRECTIONS; TERRAIN ATTRIBUTES;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORESTRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LANDFORMS; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; POLLUTION; RUNOFF; SEDIMENTOLOGY; WATERSHEDS;

SURVEYING;

NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; RUNOFF;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ERROR ANALYSIS; NITROGEN; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POLLUTION MONITORING; PRECISION; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT POLLUTION; SEDIMENT YIELD; SOIL EROSION;

ACCURACY; ANNUALIZED AGRICULTURAL NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NUTRIENT LOADING; PREDICTION; SEDIMENT; SIMULATION; SOIL EROSION; WATERSHED;

ALTITUDE; CHINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NITROGEN; SOIL;

EID: 79960408945     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1734-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. MR Ahmadzadeh M Petrou 2001 Error statistics for slope and aspect when derived from interpolated data IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39 9 1823 1833 10.1109/36.950801 (Pubitemid 32981678)
2. Bingner, R. L.; Theurer, F. D. (2005). AnnAGNPS technical processes documentation. Version USDA-ARS.
3. KJ Brannan M Hamlett 1998 Using geostatistics to select gridcell layouts for the AGNPS model Trans ASAE 41 4 1011 1018
4. J Brasington K Richards 1998 Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for topmodel Computer and Geoscience 24 4 299 314 10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00081-2 (Pubitemid 28501963)
5. DG Brown L Bian SJ Walsh 1993 Response of a distributed watershed erosion model to variations in input data aggregation levels Computers and Geosciences 19 4 499 509 10.1016/0098-3004(93)90078-J (Pubitemid 23684946)
6. JN Callow KP Van Niel GS Boggs 2007 How does modifying a DEM to reflect known hydrology affect subsequent terrain analysis? Journal of Hydrology 332 1-2 30 39 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.020 (Pubitemid 44937311)
7. -N loads predictions Journal of Hydrology 312 1-4 207 222 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.017 (Pubitemid 41392960)
8. -N loads under scenarios of land-use and management practices in a flat watershed Water, Air, and Soil pollution 154 1-4 271 293 10.1023/B:WATE.0000022973.60928.30 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXivVGgt7s%3D (Pubitemid 39329066)
9. V Chaplot C Walter P Curmi 2000 Improving soil hydromorphy prediction according to DEM resolution and available pedological data Geoderma 97 3-4 405 422 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00048-3 (Pubitemid 30647893)
10. N Chen QM Wang GA Tang 2006 The influence of DEM with different resolutions on the precision of the slope extracted in the loess plateau Journal of Huaqiao University 27 3 22 329 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmsVCktL4%3D (in Chinese)
11. Cronshey, R. G.; Theurer, F. G. (1998). AnnAGNPS non point pollutant loading model. In Proceedings of the first federal interagency hydrologic modeling conference, 19-23 April, Las Vegas, NV.
12. NS Farajall BE Vieux 1995 Capturing the essential spatial variability in distributed hydrological modeling infiltration parameters Hydrological Processes 9 1 55 68 10.1002/hyp.3360090106
13. TW FitzHugh DS Mackay 2000 Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model Journal of Hydrology 236 1-2 35 53 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00276-6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnsVCktLY%3D
14. J Gao 1997 Resolution and accuracy of terrain representation by grid DEMs at a micro-scale International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11 2 199 212 10.1080/136588197242464 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlvFyrtrk%3D
15. J-J Kao P-H Li CL Lin W-H Hu 2008 Siting analyses for water quality sampling in a catchment Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 139 205 215 10.1007/s10661-007-9828-6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXivVarsb4%3D (Pubitemid 351356618)
16. S Kienzle 2004 The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives Transactions in GIS 8 1 83 111 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00169.x
17. CE Lin CM Kao YC Lai WL Shan CY Wu 2009 Application of integrated GIS and multimedia modelling on NPS pollution evaluation Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 158 319 331 10.1007/s10661-008-0586-x 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1MjltVeqtA%3D%3D
18. FL Qin XY Wang PQ Dou LH Wang 2005 An analysis of the watershed terrain features derived from DEM with different precision and a study of the slope error control Remote Sensing For Land & Resources 5 4 56 59 (in Chinese)
19. P Quinn K Beven P Chevallier O Planchon 1991 The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models Hydrological Processes 5 1 59 80 10.1002/hyp.3360050106
20. GA Tang SS Ge FY Li JY Zhou 2005 Review of digital elevation model (DEM) based research on China Loess Plateau Journal of Mountain Science 2 3 265 270 10.1007/BF02973200
21. GA Tang MD Zhao TW Li YM Liu YL Xie 2003 Modeling slope uncertainty derived from DEMs in loess plateau Acta Geographica Sinica 58 6 824 830 (in Chinese)
22. DG Tarboton 1997 A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models Water Resources Research 33 2 309 319 10.1029/96WR03137
23. J Thompson J Bell C Butler 2001 Digital elevation model resolution: Effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling Geoderma 100 1-2 67 89 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00081-1 (Pubitemid 32152008)
24. YW Tian ZL Huang LX Zeng WF Xiao DJ Ma 2009 Impact of DEM mesh size on AnnAGNPS runoff and sediment predictions for a small scale hilly watershed Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 29 4 846 853 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXms1aqtro%3D (in Chinese)
25. BE Vieux S Needham 1993 Nonpoint-pollution model sensitivity to grid-cell size Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 119 2 141 157 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:2(141)
26. X Wang I Li Q Xu W He 2001 Study on the distribution of non-point source pollution in the watershed of Miyun reservoir, Beijing, China Water Science and Technology 44 7 35 40 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXovVWns7c%3D (Pubitemid 33039594)
27. XY Wang YX Wang F Guo XG Cai QJ Hu 2003 Nonpoint source pollution loading from the watersheds of Chaohe River and Baihe River around Miyun Reservoir Urban Environment and Urban Ecology 16 2 31 33 (in Chinese)
28. SM Wise 2007 Effect of differing DEM creation methods on the results from a hydrological model Computers & Geosciences 33 10 1351 1365 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.003 (Pubitemid 47487973)
29. S-S Wu EL Usery MP Finn DD Bosch 2008 An assessment of the effects of cell size on AGNPS modelling of water runoff Cartography and Geographic Information Science 35 4 265 278 10.1559/152304008786140542
30. Young, R. A.; Onstad, C. A.; Bosch, D. D.; Anderson, W. P. (1987). AGNPS, agricultural nonpoint source pollution model: A watershed analysis tool. Conservation Research Report, 35, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Morris, MN, USA.
31. W Zhang DR Montgomery 1994 Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations Water Resources Research 30 4 1019 1028 10.1029/93WR03553 (Pubitemid 278963)