Factorial Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (ChPVAQ) in a Sample of Chinese Patients with Chronic Pain

Pain Medicine

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1018-1025

  Wong, Wing S ^a   Mccracken, Lance M ^c   Fielding, Richard ^b  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c ROYAL NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention to pain; Chinese; Chronic pain; Confirmatory factor analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHINESE; CHRONIC PAIN; CHRONIC PAIN GRADE QUESTIONNAIRE; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN VIGILANCE AND AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TAMPA SCALE FOR KINESIOPHOBIA;

EID: 79960377312     PISSN: 15262375     EISSN: 15264637     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01169.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. McCracken LM. "Attention" to pain in persons with chronic pain: A behavioral approach. Behav Ther 1997;28:271-84.
2. McWilliams LA, Asmundson GJG. Assessing individual differences in attention to pain: Psychometric properties of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire modified for a non-clinical pain sample. Pers Individ Dif 2001;31:239-46.
3. Roelofs J, Peters ML, Muris P, Vlaeyen JWS. Dutch version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire: Validity and reliability in a pain-free population. Behav Res Ther 2002;40:1081-90.
4. Roelofs J, Peters ML, McCracken L, Vlaeyen JWS. The pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ): Further psychometric evaluation in fibromyalgia and other chronic pain syndromes. Pain 2003;101:299-306.
5. McCracken LM. A contextual analysis of attention to chronic pain: What the patient does with their pain might be more important than their awareness or vigilance alone. J Pain 2007;8:230-6.
6. Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L. Graded chronic pain status: An epidemiologic evaluation. Pain 1990;40:279-91.
7. Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, etal. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: Validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 1997;71:141-7.
8. Fielding R, Wong WS. The prevalence of chronic pain, fatigue, and insomnia in the general population of Hong Kong. Final report to the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China Hong Kong: School of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, 2008.
9. Crombez G, Van Damme S, Eccleston C. Hypervigilance to pain: An experimental and clinical analysis. Pain 2005;116:4-7.
10. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361-70.
11. Snaith R, Zigmond A. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Manual. London: NFER-Nelson; 1994.
12. Leung CM, Ho S, Kan CS, Hung CH, Chen CN. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A cross-cultural perspective. Int J Psychosom 1993;40:29-34.
13. Leung CM, Wing YK, Kwong PK, Lo A, Shum K. Validation of the Chinese-Cantonese version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999;100:456-61.
14. McCracken L. Attention to pain in persons with chronic pain: A behavioral approach. Behav Ther 1997;28:271-84.
15. Wong WS, Kwok HY, Luk KDK, etal. Fear of movement/(re)injury in Chinese chronic pain patients: Factorial validity of the Chinese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:620-29.
16. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: A new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 1990;Jan/Feb:35-43.
17. Miller RP, Kori SH, Todd DD. Tampa scale. Unpublished report. Tampa, FL, 1991.
18. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders A, Boeren RGB, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995;62:363-72.
19. Lundberg MKE, Styf J, Carlsson SG. A psychometric evaluation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-From a physiotherapeutic perspective. Physiother Theory Pract 2004;20:121-33.
20. Roelofs J, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW, etal. Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples. Pain 2007;131:181-90.
21. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: A shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain 2005;117:137-44.
22. Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van den Broeck A, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. Hypervigilance to pain in fibromyalgia: The mediating role of pain intensity and catastrophic thinking about pain. Clin J Pain 2004;20:98-102.
23. Van Damme S, Crombez G, Eccleston C. Disengagement from pain: The role of catastrophic thinking about pain. Pain 2004;107:70-6.
24. Bentler PM, Wu EJC. EQS/Windows: User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA:BMDP Statistical Software; 1993.
25. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999;6:1-55.
26. Bentler P, Bonett D. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980;88:588-606.
27. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:136-62.
28. Satorra A, Bentler P. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: Von Eye A, Clogg C, eds. Latent Variable Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:399-419.