-
1
-
-
60849133851
-
Can the high caesarean section rates be reduced
-
In: Bonnar J., Dunlop W., editors. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd
-
Robson M,. Can the high caesarean section rates be reduced. In:, Bonnar J, Dunlop W, editors. Recent Advances in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2003. pp. 71-84.
-
(2003)
Recent Advances in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, pp. 71-84
-
-
Robson, M.1
-
2
-
-
0004143386
-
-
Royal College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. London: RCOG Press
-
Royal College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
-
(2001)
The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit
-
-
-
3
-
-
49749113789
-
Post-cesarean adhesions-are they a unique entity?
-
Stark M, Hoyme UB, Stubert B, Kieback D, di Renzo GC,. Post-cesarean adhesions-are they a unique entity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21: 513-6.
-
(2008)
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
, vol.21
, pp. 513-516
-
-
Stark, M.1
Hoyme, U.B.2
Stubert, B.3
Kieback, D.4
Di Renzo, G.C.5
-
4
-
-
77950674813
-
Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions
-
Blumenfeld YJ, Caughey AB, El-Sayed YY, Daniels K, Lyell DJ,. Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions. BJOG 2010; 117: 690-4.
-
(2010)
BJOG
, vol.117
, pp. 690-694
-
-
Blumenfeld, Y.J.1
Caughey, A.B.2
El-Sayed, Y.Y.3
Daniels, K.4
Lyell, D.J.5
-
5
-
-
79951524675
-
Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section-a meta-analysis and systematic review
-
Shi Z, Ma L, Yang Y, Wang H, Schreiber A, Li X, et al., Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section-a meta-analysis and systematic review. BJOG 2011; 118: 410-22.
-
(2011)
BJOG
, vol.118
, pp. 410-422
-
-
Shi, Z.1
Ma, L.2
Yang, Y.3
Wang, H.4
Schreiber, A.5
Li, X.6
-
6
-
-
67649280400
-
Complications due to adhesion formation following caesarean sections: A review of deliveries in three cases
-
Sbarra M, Boyd M, Dardarian TS,. Complications due to adhesion formation following caesarean sections: a review of deliveries in three cases. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 394.
-
(2009)
Fertil Steril
, vol.92
, pp. 394
-
-
Sbarra, M.1
Boyd, M.2
Dardarian, T.S.3
-
7
-
-
79960361325
-
-
The Royal College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. London: RCOG Press
-
The Royal College of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Green top guidelines; Peritoneal closure. London: RCOG Press, 2002.
-
(2002)
Green Top Guidelines; Peritoneal Closure
-
-
-
8
-
-
84907164903
-
Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section
-
Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ,. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 4: CD000163.
-
(2003)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.4
-
-
Bamigboye, A.A.1
Hofmeyr, G.J.2
-
9
-
-
77956501248
-
Caesarean section surgical techniques: A randomised factorial trial (CAESAR)
-
The CAESAR Study Collaborative Group
-
The CAESAR Study Collaborative Group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG 2010; 117: 1366-76.
-
(2010)
BJOG
, vol.117
, pp. 1366-1376
-
-
-
10
-
-
0037052609
-
Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: Results of a national survey of practice in the UK
-
DOI 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00589-9, PII S0301211501005899
-
Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayers S,. Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 102: 120-6. (Pubitemid 34272718)
-
(2002)
European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
, vol.102
, Issue.2
, pp. 120-126
-
-
Tully, L.1
Gates, S.2
Brocklehurst, P.3
McKenzie-McHarg, K.4
Ayers, S.5
|