In-storage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Acclimation of the microbial community

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 3719-3726

  King, Susan M ^a   Barrington, Suzelle ^a   Guiot, Serge R ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ambient temperature; Manure treatment; Microbial acclimation; Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion; Sus scrofa domestica; Swine manure

Indexed keywords

MANURE TREATMENT; MICROBIAL ACCLIMATION; PSYCHROPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; SUS SCROFA DOMESTICA; SWINE MANURE;

AGRICULTURE; MANURES; METHANE; MICROORGANISMS; TANKS (CONTAINERS);

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ACCLIMATION; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; CONCRETE; DIGESTIBILITY; INSTALLATION; MANURE; METHANE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PIG; STABILIZATION; TEMPERATURE PROFILE; WASTE FACILITY;

CANADA;

SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA DOMESTICA;

EID: 79960349277     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.031     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beaulieu M.S., Bedard F. A geographic profile of canadian livestock, 1991-2001 2003, Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, 23 p. Cat. no. 21-601-MIE-No.062.
2. De Kimpe C.R., MacDonald K.B. Making the link between science and policy: controlling n losses from agriculture in Canada. Environ Pollut 1998, 102(1, Suppl. 1):763-769.
3. Gangbazo G., Roy J., Le Page A. Capacite de support des activites agricoles par les rivieres: Le cas du phosphore total 2005, Direction des politiques en milieu terrestre, Ministere du Developpement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs, Quebec, 28 p. Envirodoq: ENV/2005/009.
4. Hofmann N., Beaulieu M.S. A geographical profile of manure production in Canada, 2001 2006, Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, 20 p. Cat. no. 21-601-MIE-No.077.
5. Le D., Beaulieu M.S. Factors leading to the implementation of beneficial management practices for manure management on Canadian hog operations 2005, Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, 32 p. Cat. No. 21-601-MIE-No.074.
6. Martinez J., Dabert P., Barrington S., Burton C. Livestock waste treatment systems for environmental quality, food safety, and sustainability. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100(22):5527-5536.
7. Research strategy for hog manure management in Canada 1998, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Ottawa, 37 p. Cat. no. A42-77/1998E. C.R. De Kimpe (Ed.).
8. Abou Nohra J., Barrington S., Frigon J.C., Guiot S.R. In storage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine slurry. Resour Conserv Recycl 2003, 38(1):23-37.
9. Stevens M.A., Schulte D.D. Low temperature anaerobic digestion of swine manure. J Environ Eng Div ASCE 1979, 105(1):33-42.
10. Safley J.L.M., Westerman P.W. Low-temperature digestion of dairy and swine manure. Bioresour Technol 1994, 47(2):165-171.
11. Wellinger A., Kaufmann R. Psychrophilic methane generation from pig manure. Process Biochem 1982, 17:26-30.
12. Massé D.I., Droste R.L., Kennedy K.J., Patni N.K., Munroe J.A. Potential for the psychrophilic anaerobic treatment of swine manure using a sequencing batch reactor. Can Agr Eng 1997, 39(1):25-33.
13. Kotsyurbenko O.R. Trophic interactions in the methanogenic microbial community of low-temperature terrestrial ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2005, 53(1):3-13.
14. Cullimore D.R., Maule A., Mansuy N. Ambient temperature methanogenesis from pig manure waste lagoons: thermal gradient incubator studies. Agric Wastes 1985, 12(2):147-157.
15. Nozhevnikova A.N., Kotsyurbenko O.R., Parshina S.N. Anaerobic manure treatment under extreme temperature conditions. Water Sci Technol 1999, 40(1):215-221.
16. Park K.-H., Thompson A.G., Marinier M., Clark K., Wagner-Riddle C. Greenhouse gas emissions from stored liquid swine manure in a cold climate. Atmos Environ 2006, 40(4):618-627.
17. Conn K.L., Topp E., Lazarovits G. Factors influencing the concentration of volatile fatty acids, ammonia, and other nutrients in stored liquid pig manure. J Environ Qual 2007, 36(2):440-447.
18. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 2005, 1368. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA, Centennial ed. A.D. Eaton, L.S. Clesceri, E.W. Rice, A.E. Greenberg, A.H. Franson (Eds.).
19. Owen W.F., Stuckey D.C., Healy J.B., Young L.Y., McCarty P.L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res 1979, 13(6):485-492.
20. Shelton D.R., Tiedje J.M. General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984, 47(4):850-857.
21. Grady C.P.L., Smets B.F., Barbeau D.S. Variability in kinetic parameter estimates: a review of possible causes and a proposed terminology. Water Res 1996, 30(3):742-748.
22. Rittmann B.E., McCarty P.L. Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications 2000, McGraw-Hill, Boston MA, 768 p. 1st ed.
23. Chynoweth D.P., Turick C.E., Owens J.M., Jerger D.E., Peck M.W. Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 1993, 5(1):95-111.
24. Hwang S., Hansen C.L. Selective measurement of non-microbial protein in wastewater by use of kjeldhal and adenosine 5′-triphosphate analysis. Trans ASAE 1997, 40(1):267-270.
25. Horiuchi J.-I., Ebie K., Tada K., Kobayashi M., Kanno T. Simplified method for estimation of microbial activity in compost by atp analysis. Bioresour Technol 2003, 86(1):95-98.
26. Jay J.M., Loessner M.J., Golden D.A. Modern food microbiology 2005, Springer, New York, 790 p. 7th ed.
27. Nozhevnikova A.N., Kotsyurbenko O.R., Rebak S., Parshina S.N., Holliger C., Lettinga G. Anaerobic production and degradation of volatile fatty acids in low temperature environments. Water Sci Technol 2000, 41(12):39-46.
28. Kerr B.J., Ziemer C.J., Trabue S.L., Crouse J.D., Parkin T.B. Manure composition of swine as affected by dietary protein and cellulose concentrations. J Anim Sci 2006, 84(6):1584-1592.
29. Hashimoto A.G., Chen Y.R., Varel V.H. Theoretical aspects of methane production: state-of-the-art. 4th International symposium on Livestock wastes: a renewable resource 1980, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Amarillo, TX, 15-7.
30. Chynoweth D.P., Wilkie A.C., Owens J.M. Anaerobic processing of piggery wastes: a review. ASAE Annual international meeting 1998, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Orlando, FL, 39 p.
31. Colleran E., Concannon F., Golden T., Geoghegan F., Crumlish B., Killilea E., et al. Use of methanogenic activity tests to characterize anaerobic sludges, screen for anaerobic biodegradability and determine toxicity thresholds against individual anaerobic trophic groups and species. Wat Sci Tech 1992, 25(7):31-40.
32. Vavilin V.A., Lokshina L.Y., Rytov S.V., Kotsyurbenko O.R., Nozhevnikova A.N. Modelling low-temperature methane production from cattle manure by an acclimated microbial community. Bioresour Technol 1998, 63(2):159-171.
33. Kettunen R.H., Rintala J.A. The effect of low temperature (5-29°C) and adaptation on the methanogenic activity of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1997, 48(4):570-576.
34. Lokshina L.Y., Vavilin V.A., Kettunen R.H., Rintala J.A., Holliger C., Nozhevnikova A.N. Evaluation of kinetic coefficients using integrated monod and haldane models for low-temperature acetoclastic methanogenesis. Water Res 2001, 35(12):2913-2922.