Outside the boundary - Land use changes in the surroundings of urban nature reserves

Applied Geography

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 350-359

  Borgstrom S ^a   Cousins, S A O ^a   Lindborg, R ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Buffer zones; Landscape matrix; Nature conservation; Nature reserves; Protected areas; Sweden

Indexed keywords

BUFFER ZONE; LAND USE CHANGE; NATURE CONSERVATION; NATURE RESERVE; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

SWEDEN;

EID: 79960334146     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ahern J. Spatial concepts, planning strategies and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. Landscape ecological analysis: Issues and applications 1999, 175-201. Springer-Verlag Inc, New York, USA. J. Klopatek, R. Gardner (Eds.).
2. Arendt R. Linked landscapes: creating greenway corridors through conservation subdivision design strategies in the northeastern and central United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68(2-3):241-269.
3. Band L.E., Cadenasso M.L., Grimmond C.S., Grove J.M., Pickett S.T.A. Heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: pattern and process. Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes 2005, 257-278. Springer, New York. G.M. Lovett, C.G. Jones, M.G. Turner, K.C. Weathers (Eds.).
4. Bengtsson J., Angelstam P., Elmqvist T., Emanuelsson U., Folke C., Ihse M., et al. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 2003, 32(6):389-396.
5. Borgström S. Patterns and challenges of urban nature conservation - a study of southern Sweden. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(11):2671-2685.
6. Borgström S., Elmqvist T., Angelstam P., Alfsen-Norodom C. Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):16.
7. Borgström, S., Lindborg, R., & Elmqvist, T. Nature conservation for what? Analyses of urban and rural nature reserves in southern Sweden 1909-2006, in press.
8. Chowdhury R.R. Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcels. Applied Geography 2006, 26(2):129-152.
9. Crompton J. The impact of parks on property values: a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 2001, 33(1):1-31.
10. Crompton J. The impact of parks on property values: empirical evidence from the past two decades in the United States. Managing Leisure 2005, 10:203-218.
11. Cumming G.S., Cumming D.H.M., Redman C.L. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1). (1).
12. DeFries R., Hansen A., Turner B., Reid R., Liu J. Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecological Applications 2007, 17(4):1031-1038.
13. DeFries R., Karanth K., Paareth S. Interactions between protected areas and their surroundings in human-dominated tropcial landscapes. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:2870-2880.
14. DeFries R., Rovero F., Wright P., Ahumada J., Andelman S., Brandon K., et al. From plot to landscape scale: linking tropical biodiversity measures across spatial scales. Fronties in Ecology and Environment 2010, 8(3):153-160.
15. Drayton B., Primack R.B. Plant species lost in an isolated conservation area in Metropolitan Boston from 1894 to 1993. Conservation Biology 1996, 10(1):30-39.
16. Drinnan I.N. The search for fragmentation thresholds in a Southern Sydney Suburb. Biological Conservation 2005, 124(3):339-349.
17. Elander I., Lundgren Alm E., Malbert B., Sandström U. Biodiversity in urban governance and planning: examples from Swedish cities. Planning Theory and Practice 2005, 6(3):283-301.
18. Emneborg H., Götmark F. The role of threat to areas and initiative from actors for establishment of nature reserves in southern Sweden 1926-1996. Biodiversity and Conservation 2000, 9:727-738.
19. Ericsson, G., & Tord, I. (1989). Nära till naturen: En diskussion om riktinjer för grundtillgång på friluftsmarker nära tätorter. Rapport 102:1989 [Near to nature: a discussion on directions for access to outdoor recreation areas close to localities]. In. Byggforskningsrådet, Stockholm, Sweden.
20. Erixon, H., Borgström, S., & Andersson, E. Challenging dichotomies - exploring resilience as an integrative and operative conceptual framework for large-scale urban green structures in Stockholm, Sweden. Planning Theory and Practice, in press.
21. Ernstson H., Barthel S., Andersson E., Borgström S. Scale-Crossing Brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of Stockholm, Sweden. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4):28.
22. Fischer J., Fazey I., Briese R., Lindenmayer D. Making the matrix matter: challenges in Australian grazing landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 2005, 14:561-578.
23. Flodin, C.-E., Lönnerholm, E., Talling, A.-M., & Westberg, J. (1983). Friytor i stadsförnyelsen: Råd vid översiktlig planering. Rapport R106:1983. [Open space in urban developments: advices in comprehensive planning]. In. Byggforskningsrådet., Stockholm, Sweden.
24. Flores A., Pickett S.T.A., Zipperer W.C., Pouyat R.V., Pirani R. Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a greenspace system for the New York City region. Landscape and Urban Planning 1998, 39(4):295-308.
25. Forman R.T.T. Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Gaston K., Jackson S., Cantú-Salazar L., Cruz-Pinón G. The ecological performance of protected areas. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2008, 39:93-113.
27. Hansen A., DeFries R. Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications 2007, 17(4):974-988.
28. Jansson Å, Nohrstedt P. Carbon sinks and human freshwater dependence in Stockholm County. Ecological Economics 2001, 39:361-370.
29. Kahn P.H., Kellert S.R. Children and nature. Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionarey investigations 2002, MIT Press, London.
30. Kramer D.B., Doran P. Land conversion at the protected area's edge. Conservation Letters 2010, 3:349-358.
31. Leitao A.B., Ahern J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 59(2):65-93.
32. Lundgren Alm, E., Korhonen, P., Castell, P., Tornberg, J., & Malbert, B. (2004). Grönstrukturens synliggörande. En förutsättning för integration av kunskaper om grönstrukturen i stadsplaneringen. [Recognising the green structure. A precondition for integration of knowledge about green structures into urban planning]. In. Temat för Byggd miljö & Hållbar utveckling, Chalmers Arkitektur, Chalmers tekniska högskola, Göteborg.
33. Martino D. Buffer zones around protected areas: a brief literature review. Electronic Green Journal 2001, 1:15. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/02n4v17n.
34. McDonald R.I., Yuan-Farrell C., Fievet C., Moeller M., Kareiva P., Foster D., et al. Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings. Conservation Biology 2007, 21(6):1526-1536.
35. McDonald R.I., Kareiva P., Forman R. The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:1695-1703.
36. McKinney M.L. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 2002, 52(10):883-890.
37. McPherson E.G., Nowak D., Heisler G., Grimmond S. Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago urban forest climate project. Urban Ecosystems 1997, 1:49-61.
38. Munroe D.K., Croissant C., York M.A. Land use policy and landscapenext term fragmentation in an urbanizing region: assessing the impact of zoning. Applied Geography 2005, 25(2):121-141.
39. Murphy H.T., Lovett-Doust J. Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter?. Oikos 2004, 105(1):3-14.
40. Parrish J.D., Braun D.P., Unnasch R.S. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 2003, 53(9):851-860.
41. Pressey R.L. Ad hoc reservations: forward and backward steps in developing representative reserve systems?. Conservation Biology 1994, 8:662-668.
42. Ricketts T.H. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 2001, 158(1):87-99.
43. Schultz P.W. Empathizing with nature: the effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56:391-406.
44. Schwartz M.W. Conservation in highly fragmented landscapes 1997, Chapman & Hall, New York.
45. Schwartz M.W., Jurjavcic N.L., O'Brien J.M. Conservation's disenfranchised urban poor. Bioscience 2002, 52(7):601-606.
46. RegDos, database on nature conservation areas in Sweden 2006, SEPA., Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden.
47. Kartverktyget Skyddad Natur 2010, SEPA, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
48. Southworth J., Nagendra H., Munroe D.K. Introduction to the special issue: are parks working? Exploring human-environment tradeoffs in protected area conservation. Applied Geography 2006, 26(2):87-95.
49. Grönområden för fler- en vägledning för bedömning av närhet och attraktivitet för bättre hälsa 2009, Statens folkhälsoinstitut, Rapport 2009-02. In, östersund.
50. Tätorter 2005. Statistiska meddelanden 2006, Statistics Sweden, SCB, Stockholm, Sweden. SCB (Ed.).
51. Stenhouse R.N. Local Government conservation and management of Native Vegetation in urban Australia. Environmental Management 2004, 34(2):209-222.
52. Ståhle A. Mer park i tätare stad. Teoretiska och empiriska undersökningar av stadsplaneringens mått på friytetillgång 2005, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, (Vol. Licentiate thesis). School of Architecture (Ed.).
53. Sukopp H., Werner P. Nature in cities 1982, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
54. Tjallingii S. Green structure and urban planning, general outcomes of COST Action C11. COST Action C11. Green structure and urban planning. Final report 2005, 15-19. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. A.C. Werquin, B. Duhem, G. Lindholm, B. Oppermann, S. Pauleit, S. Tjallingii (Eds.).
55. Trzyna T. Global urbanization and protected areas. CIPA Environmental studies Series 2007, vol. 12. InterEnvironment California Institute of Public Affairs, Sacramento, California.
56. Turner W.R., Nakamura T., Dinetti M. Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 2004, 54(6):585-590.
57. Biosphere reserves: The Seville strategy and the statutory framework of the world network 1996, UNESCO, UNESCO, Paris.
58. Verburg P.H., Overmars K.P., Huigen M.G.A., de Groot W.T., Veldkamp A. Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines. Applied Geography 2006, 26(2):153-173.
59. Wade A., Theobald D. Residential development encroachment on U.S. protected areas. Conservation Biology 2009, 24(1):151-161.
60. Wiens J.A. The emerging role of patchiness in conservation biology. The ecological basis of conservation 1997, 93-107. Chapman & Hall, New York. S.T.A. Pickett, R.S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, G.E. Likens (Eds.).
61. Wittemyer G., Elsen P., Bean W.T., Coleman A., Burton O., Brashares J.S. Accelerated human population growth at protected areas edges. Science 2008, 321:123-126.
62. Young C.H., Jarvis P.J. Measuring urban habitat fragmentation: an example from the Black Country, UK. Landscape Ecology 2001, 16(7):643-658.
63. Zipperer W.C., Wu J., Pouyat R.V., Pickett S.T.A. The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecological Applications 2000, 10(3):685-688.