Sectoral evaluation of EIA practice in the Sudan

International Journal of Environmental Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 189-204

  Ahmed, M I ^a   Abdella Elturabi, L D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KHARTOUM   (Sudan)

Author keywords

Eia; Environment; Management; Planning; Policy; Sudan; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SUSTAINABILITY;

SUDAN;

EID: 79960312887     PISSN: 17356865     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ADB, (2001). Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures for African Development Banks. African Development Bank.
2. Ahmad B. and Wood C. M. (2002). A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Environ Impact Assess Rev., 22, 213-34.
3. Ali, O. M. (2002). EIA from Sudanese Perspective. (In UNEP-ETB. Environmental Impact Assessment Resource Manual, Section B, pp.1-6). UNEP.
4. Ali, O. M. (2007). Policy and institutional reforms for an effective EIA system in Sudan. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9 (1), 67-82.
5. Canter, L.W. (1996). Environmental Impact Assessment. 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill Inc., Singapore.
6. Fuller, K. (1999). Quality and quality control in environmental impact assessment. (In: Petts J, editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment, 2. Environmental impact assessment in practice: impact and limitations. Oxford, Blackwell, 55-82).
7. Government of Sudan, (2005). The Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army. Nairobi, Government of Sudan.
8. Government of Sudan (2005) (b). The Interim National Constitution of Sudan. Nairobi, Government of Sudan. EC, (1999). Guidelines for the Assessment and Indirect and cumulative impact and interaction. European Commission.
9. EC, (1994). Environmental Impact Assessment Review Checklist. Directorate-General XI, ERM, R. Colley and K. Raymond (Eds.). European Commission.
10. Elturabi, L. D. (2007). Assessment of Environmental Management in Various Developing Sectoral Projects: Systematic Analysis of EIA Practices, Dessertation, the University of Khartoum.
11. FAO. (1995). Agriculture Department, EIA of Irrigation and Drainage Projects. FAO corporate document repository.
12. Lee, N. and Colley, R. (1990). Reviewing the quality of environmental statements. Occasional Paper No. 24. Manchester, EIA Centre: University of Manchester.
13. Nadeem O., and Hameed R. (2008). Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 28, 562-571.
14. Sadler, B. (1996). Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance, Final Report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Ottawa, Canada.
15. Sadler, Barry, Karen Brown, Pierre Senecal, Bemic Goldsmith, and Shirley Conover. (1999). Principles of EIA Best Practice. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA).
16. Thomas, I. (2001). Environmental impact assessment in Australia: theory and practice. Third Ed. Australia: Federation Press.
17. UN-ECA, (2005). Review of application of EIA in selected African Countries. UN-ECA.
18. UNEP, (2007). Post Conflict Environmental Assessment. UNEP.
19. UNEP, (2006). Assessment of Environmental Policy, Institutions and Legal Framework in North and South Sudan. UNEP.
20. WB. (1999). Environmental Department. Environmental Assessment Source Book. World bank.
21. Wood, C. M. (2003). Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. Second ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.