Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Kimyai, Soodabeh ^a   Lotfipour, Farzaneh ^a   Pourabbas, Reza ^b   Sadr, Alireza ^c   Nikazar, Saeedeh ^a   Milani, Morteza ^a  

^a TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bacterial adherence; Composite resin; Giomer; Prophylaxis methods

Indexed keywords

GIOMER; PUMICE; RESIN; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; RUBBER CUP; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOPOGRAPHY;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; COMPOSITE RESINS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79960288700     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.16.e561     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. López-Píriz R, Aguilar L, Giménez MJ. Management of odontogenic infection of pulpal and periodontal origin. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E154-9.
2. Yamamoto K, Ohashi S, Taki E, Hirata K. Adherence of oral streptococci to composite resin of varying surface roughness. Dent Mater J. 1996;15:201-4.
3. Wu SS, Yap AU, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of prophylaxis regimens on surface roughness of glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent. 2005;30:180-4.
4. Meier R, Hauser-Gerspach I, Lüthy H, Meyer J. Adhesion of oral streptococci to all-ceramics dental restorative materials in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:3249-53.
5. Carlén A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials. 2001;22:481-7.
6. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258-69.
7. Agger MS, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Hovgaard O. Abrasiveness of an air-powder polishing system on root surfaces in vitro. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:407-11.
8. Yap AU, Wu SS, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2005;30:99-104.
9. Calheiros FC, Sadek FT, Braga RR, Cardoso PE. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations. J Dent. 2004;32:407-12.
10. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C, Congiu MD. In vitro evaluation of giomers microleakage after exposure to 33% hydrogen peroxide: self-etch vs total-etch adhesives. Oper Dent. 2006;31:227-32.
11. Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent. 2005;30:282-9.
12. Lai YL, Lin YC, Chang CS, Lee SY. Effects of sonic and ultrasonic scaling on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restorative materials for cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2007;32:273-8.
13. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, Donati ME, Breschi L, Prati C, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4457-63.
14. Daneshmehr L, Matin K, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Effects of root dentin surface coating with all-in-one adhesive materials on biofilm adherence. J Dent. 2008;36:33-41.
15. Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, et al. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:613-22.
16. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17 Suppl 2:68-81.
17. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:915-23.
18. Yap AU, Mok BY. Effects of professionally applied topical fluorides on surface hardness of composite-based restoratives. Oper Dent. 2002;27:576-81.
19. Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent Mater. 1992;8:16-20.
20. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater. 2004;20:789-95.
21. Gonzalez Ede H, Yap AU, Hsu SC. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2004;29:578-85.
22. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK. Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27:259-65.
23. Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24:732-6.