-
1
-
-
77956416153
-
Randomized phase II trials-inevitable or inadvisable?
-
Gan HK, Grothey A, Pond GR, et al. Randomized phase II trials-inevitable or inadvisable?. J Clin Oncol. 2010 ; 28: 2641-47
-
(2010)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.28
, pp. 2641-47
-
-
Gan, H.K.1
Grothey, A.2
Pond, G.R.3
-
2
-
-
57849154374
-
Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: The importance of randomisation
-
Ratain MJ, Sargent DJ. Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation. Eur J Cancer. 2009 ; 45: 275-80
-
(2009)
Eur J Cancer
, vol.45
, pp. 275-80
-
-
Ratain, M.J.1
Sargent, D.J.2
-
4
-
-
0037374498
-
The price of innovation: New estimates of drug development costs
-
DOI 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00126-1
-
DiMasi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ. 2003 ; 22: 151-85 (Pubitemid 36279392)
-
(2003)
Journal of Health Economics
, vol.22
, Issue.2
, pp. 151-185
-
-
DiMasi, J.A.1
Hansen, R.W.2
Grabowski, H.G.3
-
5
-
-
33846995628
-
Economics of new oncology drug development
-
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0803
-
DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2007 ; 25: 209-16 (Pubitemid 350003036)
-
(2007)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.25
, Issue.2
, pp. 209-216
-
-
DiMasi, J.A.1
Grabowski, H.G.2
-
6
-
-
33750455106
-
Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: Relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design
-
DOI 10.1177/1740774506070654
-
Taylor JM, Braun TM, Li Z. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design. Clin Trials. 2006 ; 3: 335-48 (Pubitemid 44645824)
-
(2006)
Clinical Trials
, vol.3
, Issue.4
, pp. 335-348
-
-
Taylor, J.M.G.1
Braun, T.M.2
Li, Z.3
-
7
-
-
79951742176
-
Excessive false-positive errors in single-arm phase II trials: A simulation-based analysis
-
Tang H, Foster NR, Grothey A, et al. Excessive false-positive errors in single-arm phase II trials: a simulation-based analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009 ; 27: 15s - 15s
-
(2009)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.27
-
-
Tang, H.1
Foster, N.R.2
Grothey, A.3
-
8
-
-
70349671467
-
A comparison of phase II study strategies
-
Hunsberger S, Zhao Y, Simon R. A comparison of phase II study strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 ; 15: 5950-55
-
(2009)
Clin Cancer Res
, vol.15
, pp. 5950-55
-
-
Hunsberger, S.1
Zhao, Y.2
Simon, R.3
-
9
-
-
22344447501
-
Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: Current status and future directions
-
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.197
-
Lee JJ, Feng L. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2005 ; 23: 4450-57 (Pubitemid 46209969)
-
(2005)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.23
, Issue.19
, pp. 4450-4457
-
-
Lee, J.J.1
Feng, L.2
-
10
-
-
0033984551
-
Content and quality of currently published phase II cancer trials
-
Mariani L, Marubini E. Content and quality of currently published phase II cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2000 ; 18: 429-36 (Pubitemid 30056434)
-
(2000)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.18
, Issue.2
, pp. 429-436
-
-
Mariani, L.1
Marubini, E.2
-
11
-
-
0020108590
-
One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials
-
Fleming TR. One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1982 ; 38: 143-51
-
(1982)
Biometrics
, vol.38
, pp. 143-51
-
-
Fleming, T.R.1
-
12
-
-
0024536437
-
Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials
-
DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9
-
Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989 ; 10: 1-10 (Pubitemid 19099520)
-
(1989)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.10
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-10
-
-
Simon, R.1
-
13
-
-
27244436755
-
Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials
-
Rubinstein LV, Korn EL, Freidlin B, et al. Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005 ; 23: 7199-206
-
(2005)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.23
, pp. 7199-206
-
-
Rubinstein, L.V.1
Korn, E.L.2
Freidlin, B.3
-
15
-
-
39449091622
-
Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control
-
DOI 10.1002/sim.2961
-
Jung S-H. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control. Stat Med. 2008 ; 27: 568-83 (Pubitemid 351266343)
-
(2008)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.27
, Issue.4
, pp. 568-583
-
-
Jung, S.-H.1
-
16
-
-
0025005369
-
Incorporating historical control data in planning phase II clinical trials
-
Thall PF, Simon R. Incorporating historical control data in planning phase II clinical trials. Stat Med. 1990 ; 9: 215-28 (Pubitemid 20252730)
-
(1990)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.9
, Issue.3
, pp. 215-228
-
-
Thall, P.F.1
Simon, R.2
-
17
-
-
1142275380
-
Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials
-
DOI 10.1002/sim.1600
-
Jung SH, Lee T, Kim K, George SL. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Stat Med. 2004 ; 23: 561-69 (Pubitemid 38208184)
-
(2004)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.23
, Issue.4
, pp. 561-569
-
-
Jung, S.-H.1
Lee, T.2
Kim, K.M.3
George, S.L.4
-
18
-
-
4444272419
-
Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs
-
DOI 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00218.x
-
Thall PF, Cook JD. Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Biometrics. 2004 ; 60: 684-93 (Pubitemid 39181113)
-
(2004)
Biometrics
, vol.60
, Issue.3
, pp. 684-693
-
-
Thall, P.F.1
Cook, J.D.2
-
19
-
-
49249102416
-
Phase II stopping rules that employ response rates and early progression
-
Goffin JR, Tu D. Phase II stopping rules that employ response rates and early progression. J Clin Oncol. 2008 ; 26: 3715-20
-
(2008)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.26
, pp. 3715-20
-
-
Goffin, J.R.1
Tu, D.2
-
20
-
-
37149053580
-
Design and conduct of phase II studies of targeted anticancer therapy: Recommendations from the task force on methodology for the development of innovative cancer therapies (MDICT)
-
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.031, PII S0959804907005904
-
Booth CM, Calvert AH, Giaccone G, et al. on behalf of the Task Force on Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies. Design and conduct of phase II studies of targeted anticancer therapy: recommendations from the task force on methodology for the development of innovative cancer therapies (MDICT). Eur J Cancer. 2008 ; 44: 25-29 (Pubitemid 350256934)
-
(2008)
European Journal of Cancer
, vol.44
, Issue.1
, pp. 25-29
-
-
Booth, C.M.1
Calvert, A.H.2
Giaccone, G.3
Lobbezoo, M.W.4
Eisenhauer, E.A.5
Seymour, L.K.6
-
21
-
-
74949139051
-
Ultimate fate of oncology drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration without a randomized trial
-
Tsimberidou A-M, Braiteh F, Stewart DJ, Kurzock R. Ultimate fate of oncology drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration without a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 ; 27: 6243-49
-
(2009)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.27
, pp. 6243-49
-
-
Tsimberidou, A.-M.1
Braiteh, F.2
Stewart, D.J.3
Kurzock, R.4
-
22
-
-
67651061459
-
Current issues in oncology drug development, with a focus on phase II trials
-
Sargent DJ, Taylor JMG. Current issues in oncology drug development, with a focus on phase II trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2009 ; 19: 556-62
-
(2009)
J Biopharm Stat
, vol.19
, pp. 556-62
-
-
Sargent, D.J.1
Taylor, J.M.G.2
|