Fuzzy modeling and simulation for lead removal using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF)

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 192, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 585-592

  Rahmanian, Bashir ^a   Pakizeh, Majid ^a   Esfandyari, Morteza ^a   Heshmatnezhad, Fazlollah ^a   Maskooki, Abdolmajid ^b  

^a FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RIFST   (Iran)

Author keywords

Box Behnken design; Fuzzy logic; Lead; MEUF; Modeling

Indexed keywords

BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN; CALCULATED VALUES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATION; FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH; FUZZY LOGIC MODEL; FUZZY MODELING; FUZZY MODELS; HYDRODYNAMIC CONDITIONS; MEMBRANE SEPARATION PROCESS; METAL REJECTION; MEUF; MICELLAR ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION; NON-LINEARITY; PERMEATION FLUXES; PROCESSING VARIABLES; RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS; THREE-LEVEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; FUZZY SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FUZZY LOGIC;

LEAD; METAL;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LEAD; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUZZY LOGIC; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICELLE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PROCESSING; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FUZZY LOGIC; LEAD; MICELLES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 79960268642     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.051     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Sabrya R., Hafeza A., Khedra M., El-Hassanin A. Removal of lead by an emulsion liquid membrane Part I. Desalination 2007, 212:165-175.
2. Somerset V., Petrik L., Iwuoha E. Alkaline hydrothermal conversion of fly ash precipitates into zeolites 3: the removal of mercury and lead ions from wastewater. J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 87:125-131.
3. Fang Y.Y., Zeng G.M., Huang J.H., Liu J.X., Xu X.M., Xu K., Qu Y.H. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium ions with anionic-nonionic surfactants. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:514-519.
4. Tunay O., Kabdasli N.I. Hydroxide precipitation of complexed metals. Water Res. 1994, 28(10):2117-2124.
5. Chen G.H. Electrochemicals technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 38(1):11-41.
6. D,abrowski A., Hubicki Z., Podkoóscielny P., Robens E. Selective removal of the heavy metals from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method. Chemosphere 2004, 56(2):91-106.
7. Landaburu-Aguirre J., García V., Pongr_acz E., Keiski R.L. The removal of zinc from synthetic wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: statistical design of experiments. Desalination 2009, 240:262-269.
8. Kurniawan T.A., Chan G.Y.S., Loa W.H., Babel S. Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 118:83-98.
9. Muthukrishnan M., Guha B.K. Heavy metal separation by using surface modified nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2006, 200:351-353.
10. Ahn K.H., Song K.G., Cha H.Y., Yeom I.T. Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration. Desalination 1999, 122:77-84.
11. Aliane A., Bounatiro N., Cherif A.T., Akretche D.E. Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by complexation-ultrafiltration using a water-soluble macroligand. Water Res. 2001, 35(9):2320-2326.
12. Kryvoruchko A., Yurlova L., Kornilovich B. Purification of water containing heavy metal by chelating-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination 2002, 144:243-248.
13. Ujang Z., Anderson G.K. Application of low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane for Pb2+ and Cu2+ removal from wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34:247-253.
14. Ahmad A.L., Puasa S.W., Zulkali M.M.D. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of reactive dyes from an aqueous solution. Desalination 2006, 191:153-161.
15. Baek K., Yang JiW. Cross-flow micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of nitrate and chromate: competitive binding. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, B108:119-123.
16. Yurlova L., Kryvoruchko A., Kornilovich B. Removal of Ni2+ ions from wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination 2002, 144:255-260.
17. Rahmanian B., Pakizeha M., Maskooki A. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of zinc in synthetic wastewater using spiral-wound membrane. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184:261-267.
18. Baek K., Lee H.H., Yang J.W. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for simultaneous removal of ferricyanide and nitrate. Desalination 2003, 158:157-166.
19. Gwicanaa S., Vorstera N., Jacobs E. The use of a cationic surfactant for micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of platinum group metal anions. Desalination 2006, 199:504-506.
20. Purkait M.K., DasGupta S., De S. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of eosin dye using hexadecyl pyridinium chloride. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B136:972-977.
21. Ghafari Sh., Abdul Aziz H., Isa M.H., Zinatizadeh A.A. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation-flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163:650-656.
22. Idris A., Kormin F., Noordin M.Y. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 49:271-280.
23. Kazemia S.Y., sadat Hamidi A., Asanjaranib N., Zolgharnein J. Optimization of a new polymeric chromium (III) membrane electrode based on methyl violet by using experimental design. Talanta 2010, 81:1681-1687.
24. Yetilmezsoy K., Demirel S., Vanderbei R.J. Response surface modeling of Pb2+ removal from aqueous solution by Pictacia vera L.: Box-Behnken experimental design. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171:551-562.
25. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8:338-353.
26. Sadiq R., Al-Zahrani M.A., Sheikh A.K., Husain T., Farooq Sh. Performance evaluation of slow sand filters using fuzzy rule-based modeling. Environ. Model. Software 2004, 19:507-515.
27. Takagi T., Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 1985, 15:116-132.
28. Mamdani E.H., Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1975, 7:1-13.
29. Huang Z., Hahn J. Fuzzy modeling of signal transduction networks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64:2044-2056.
30. Zadeh L.A. Making computer think like people. IEEE Spectr. 1984, 8:26-32.
31. Haack S. Do we need fuzzy logic?. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 1979, 11:437-445.
32. Altunkaynak A, Chellam S. Prediction of specific permeate flux during cross flow microfiltration of polydispersed colloidal suspensions by fuzzy logic models. Desalination 2010, 253:188-194.
33. Alvarez Grimaa M., Babusika R. Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 1999, 36:339-349.
34. Babuska R. Fuzzy Modeling for Control 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.
35. Keshwani D.R., Jones D.D., Meyer G.E., Brand R.M. Rule-based Mamdani-type fuzzy modeling of skin permeability. Appl. Soft Comput. 2008, 8:285-294.
36. Huang Y.C., Batchelor B., Koseoglu S.S. Crossflow surfactant-based ultrafiltration of heavy metals from waste streams. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1994, 29:1979-1998.
37. Sivanandam S.N., Sumathi S., Deepa S.N. Introduction to Fuzzy Logic using MATLAB 2007, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg New York.
38. Ahn K.K., Truong D.Q. Online tuning fuzzy PID controller using robust extended Kalman filter. J. Process. Control 2009, 19:1011-1023.
39. Razavia S.M.A., Mousavi S.M., Mortazavi S.A. Dynamic prediction of milk ultrafltration performance: a neural network approach. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:4185-4195.
40. Xiarchosa I., Jaworska A., Zakrzewska-Trznadel G. Response surface methodology for the modelling of copper removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 321:222-231.
41. Sargolzaei J., Khoshnoodi M., Saghatoleslami N., Mousavi S.M. Fuzzy inference system to modeling of cross flow milk ultrafiltration. Appl. Soft Comput 2008, 8:456-465.
42. Rahmanian B., Pakizeh M., Mansoori S.A.A., Abedini R. Application of experimental design approach and artificial neural network (ANN) for the determination of potential micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 187:67-74.