Experimental evolution of defense against a competitive mold confers reduced sensitivity to fungal toxins but no increased resistance in Drosophila larvae

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Trienens, Monika ^a,b   Rohlfs, Marko ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELOPATHY; ANTAGONISM; CHEMICAL DEFENSE; COLONY STRUCTURE; CORRELATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLY; FUNGUS; HABITAT TYPE; LARVA; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REPRODUCTION; SECONDARY METABOLITE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; TOLERANCE; TOXIN; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; ARTHROPODA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMERICELLA NIDULANS; FUNGI; HEXAPODA;

MYCOTOXIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASPERGILLUS NIDULANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DRUG EFFECT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FUNGUS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; IMMUNOLOGY; LARVA; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ASPERGILLUS NIDULANS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FUNGI; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; LARVA; MALE; MYCOTOXINS;

EID: 79960264890     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-206     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Biodiversity of fungi. Mueller GM Bills GF Foster MS, Oxford: Academic Press 2004
2. Trophic interactions of fungi with animals. Ruess L Lussenhop J, The fungal community- its organization and role in the ecosystem Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, Dighton J, White JF, Oudermans P, 2005 581 598
3. Fungal secondary metabolites as modulators of interactions with insects and other arthropods. Rohlfs M Chruchill ACL, Fungal Genetics and Biology 2011 48 23 34 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.08.008 20807586
4. Antiisectan effects of Aspergillus metabolites. Wicklow DT Dowd PF Gloer JB, The genus Aspergillus New York: Plenum Press, Powell KA, Renwick A, Perberdy JF, 1994 93 114
5. Secondary metabolism: regulation and role in fungal biology. Fox EM Howlett BJ, Current Opinion in Microbiology 2008 11 481 487 10.1016/j.mib.2008. 10.007 18973828
6. Paradigm shifts in fungal secondary metabolite research. Stadler M Keller NP, Mycological Research 2008 112 127 130 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.12.002 18319144 (Pubitemid 351305475)
7. Aflatoxin B1 detoxification by CYP321A1 in Helicoverpazea. Niu G Wen Z, Rupasinghe SG Zeng RS, Berenbaum MR Schuler MA, Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 2008 69 32 45 10.1002/arch.20256 18615618
8. Yeast and Drosophila. Begon M, The Genetics and biology of Drosophila London: Academic Press, Ashburner M, Carson HL, Thompson Jr JN, 1982 345 384
9. Ovipositing female house flies provision offspring larvae with bacterial food. Lam K Geisreiter C Gries G, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2009 133 292 295 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00928.x
10. Interaction of competing fungi with fly larvae. Lussenhop J Wicklow DT, Microbial Ecology 1985 11 175 182 10.1007/BF02010489
11. Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion. Rozen DE Engelmoer DJP Smiseth PT, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 2008 105 17890 17895 10.1073/pnas.0805403105
12. Bacteria on housefly eggs, Musca domestica, suppress fungal growth in chicken manure through nutrient depletion or antifungal metabolites. Lam K Thu K Tsang M Moore M, Gries G, Naturwissenschaften 2009 96 1127 1132 10.1007/s00114-009-0574-1 19636523
13. The effects of larval density on several strains of the house fly. Sullivan RL Sokal RR, Ecology 1963 44 120 130 10.2307/1933186
14. Inhibition of Drosophila melanogaster and D. hydei by Aspergillus niger. Hodge S Mitchell P, Drosophila Information Service 1997 80 6 7
15. Fruit, flies and filamentous fungi - experimental analysis of animal-microbe competition using Drosophila melanogaster and Aspergillus as a model system. Trienens M Keller NP Rohlfs M, Oikos 2010 119 1765 1775 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18088.x
16. The relationship between Drosophila occurrence and mould abundance on rotting fruit. Hodge S, British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 1996 9 87 91
17. Direct and indirect effects of Drosophila larvae on the growth on moulds. Hodge S Arthur W, The Entomologist 1997 116 198 204 (Pubitemid 27513769)
18. Factors affecting the occurrence of facilitative effects in interspecific interactions: an experiment using two species of Drosophila and Aspergillus niger. Hodge S Mitchell P Arthur W, Oikos 1999 87 166 174 10.2307/3547007 (Pubitemid 29511247)
19. Competition with filamentous fungi and its implications for a gregarious life-style in insects living on ephemeral resources. Rohlfs M Obmann B Petersen R, Ecological Entomology 2005 30 556 563 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00722.x (Pubitemid 43906582)
20. Allee effect in larval resource exploitation in Drosophila: an interaction between density of adults, larvae and micro-organisms. Wertheim B Marchais J, Vet LEM Dicke M, Ecological Entomology 2002 27 608 617 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00449.x
21. Früchte als natürliche Entwicklungssubstrate von Drosophiliden. Schatzmann E, Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 1977 50 135 148
22. A key role for vesicles in fungal secondary metabolism. Chanda A Roze LV, Kang S Artymovich KA, Hicks GR Raikhel NV, Calvo AM Linz JE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 2009 106 19533 19538 10.1073/pnas.0907416106
23. Insecticidal and larvicidal activities of the mycotoxins aflatoxin B1, rubratoxin B, patulin and diacetoxyscirpenol towards Drosophila melanogaster. Reiss J, Chemico-Biological Interactions 1975 10 339 342 10.1016/0009-2797(75) 90055-1 806368
24. Selection for increased resistance to aflatoxin B1 toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Melone PD Chinnici JP, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 1986 48 60 65 10.1016/0022-2011(86)90143-6 3088128
25. Genetic variation and the role of insect life history traits in the ability of Drosophila larvae to develop in the presence of a filamentous fungus. Rohlfs M, Evolutionary Ecology 2006 20 271 289 10.1007/s10682-006-0002-3
26. Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Woolhouse MEJ Webster JP Domingo E Charlesworth B, Levin BR, Nature Genetics 2002 32 569 577 10.1038/ng1202-569 12457190 (Pubitemid 35435167)
27. Multiple reciprocal adaptations and rapid genetic change upon experimental coevolution of an animal host and its microbial parasite. Schulte RD Makus C Hasert B Michiels N, Schulenburg H, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 2010 107 7359 7364 10.1073/pnas.1003113107
28. Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Råberg L Graham AL Read AF, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009 364 37 49 10.1098/rstb.2008.0184
29. NMR structures of damaged DNA. Lukin M de los Santos C, Chemical Reviews 2006 106 607 686 10.1021/cr0404646 16464019
30. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Faul F Erdfelder E, Lang AG Buchner A, Behavior Research Methods 2007 39 175 191 10.3758/BF03193146 17695343
31. Hypothesis testing and statistical power. Park HM, The University Information Technology Service (UITS), Indiana University 2010
32. Insect Infection and Immunity - Evolution, Ecology, and Mechanisms. Rolff J Reynolds S, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009
33. Ecological immunology. Schulenburg H Kurtz J, Moret Y Siva-Jothy MT, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009 364 3 14 10.1098/rstb.2008.0249
34. Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Kraaijeveld AR Godfray HCJ, Nature 1997 389 278 280 10.1038/38483 9305840 (Pubitemid 27406639)
35. Selection for resistance to a fungal pathogen in Drosophila melanogaster. Kraaijeveld AR Godfray HCJ, Heredity 2008 100 400 406 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801092 18301441 (Pubitemid 351441862)
36. The evolutionary costs of immunological maintenance and deployment. McKean K Yourth C, Lazzaro B Clark A, BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008 8 76 10.1186/1471-2148-8-76 18315877
37. Experimental evolution shows Drosophila melanogaster resistance to a macrosporidian pathogen has fitness costs. Vijendravarma RK Kraaijeveld AR Godfray HCJ, Evolution 2009 63 104 114 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00516.x 18786186
38. Chemically mediated competition between microbes and animals: microbes as consumers in food webs. Burkepile DE Parker JD Woodson CB Mills HJ, Kubanek J Sobecky PA, Hay ME, Ecology 2006 87 2821 2831 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2821: CMCBMA]2.0.CO;2 17168026 (Pubitemid 44904867)
39. Evolutionary ecology, antibiosis, and all that rot. Kaspari M Stevenson B, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 2008 105 19027 19028 10.1073/pnas.0810507105
40. Experimental evolution of resistance against a competing fungus in Drosophila. Wölfle S Trienens M Rohlfs M, Oecologia 2009 161 781 190 10.1007/s00442-009-1414-x 19597847
41. Direct detection using the Drosophila DNA repair test and isolation of a DNA-damaging mycotoxin, 5,6.dihydropenicillic acid, in fungal culture. Obana H Kumeda Y, Nishimune T Usami Y, Food Chemistry and Toxicology 1994 32 37 43 10.1016/0278-6915(84)90034-6
42. Choice of oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. del Solar E Palomino H, American Naturalist 1966 100 127 133 10.1086/282406
43. Effects of aggregation pheromone on individual behaviour and food web interactions: a field study on Drosophila. Wertheim B Allemand R, Vet LEM Dicke M, Ecological Entomology 2006 31 216 226 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00757.x
44. Clash of kingdoms or why Drosophila larvae respond to fungal competitors. Rohlfs M, Frontiers in Zoology 2005 2 2 10.1186/1742-9994-2-2 15679898
45. Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Roy BA Kirchner JW, Evolution 2000 54 51 63 10937183 (Pubitemid 30186268)
46. Constraints on the evolution of tolerance to herbicide in the common morning glory: resistance and tolerance are mutually exclusive. Baucom RS Mauricio R, Evolution 2008 62 2842 2854 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00514.x 18786188
47. Detecting ecological trade-offs using selection experiments. Fry JD, Ecology 2003 84 1672 1678 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1672:DETUSE]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 37435699)
48. SAS/STAT 9.1 user's guide - the MIXED procedure. SAS Institute, Cary: SAS Institute 2005