Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn's disease: Validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1759-1768

  Rimola, Jordi ^a   Ordás, Ingrid ^a   Rodriguez, Sonia ^a   García Bosch, Orlando ^a   Aceituno, Montserrat ^a   Llach, Josep ^a   Ayuso, Carmen ^a   Ricart, Elena ^a   Panés, Julián ^a  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crohn's disease; inflammatory bowel diseases; magnetic resonance imaging; validation study

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT; MESALAZINE; STEROID; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ANTIBODY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLON ULCER; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; CROHN DISEASE ENDOSCOPIC INDEX OF SEVERITY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOCOLONOSCOPY; INTESTINE WALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE INDEX OF ACTIVITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REMISSION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY; WALL SIGNAL INTENSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLON; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CROHN DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULCER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960245749     PISSN: 10780998     EISSN: 15364844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.21551     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19: 1450-1460.
2. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology. 2008; 247: 64-79.
3. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut. 2005; 54: 250-256. (Pubitemid 40139242)
4. Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, et al. Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 113-121.
5. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia BO, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in Crohn disease. Gut. 2009; 58: 1113-1120.
6. Charlson ME, Ales KL, Simon R, et al. Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods? Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147: 2155-2161. (Pubitemid 18008719)
7. Knottnerus JA., Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls. Prim Care. 1995; 22: 341-363.
8. Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 826-832. (Pubitemid 37162656)
9. Harvey RF, Bradshaw JM., A simple index of Crohn's-disease activity. Lancet. 1980; 1: 514.
10. Mary JY, Modigliani R., Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the severity for Crohn's disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d'Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Gut. 1989; 30: 983-989.
11. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Silverman R, et al. Bowel disease: prospective comparison of CT and 1.5-T pre- and postcontrast MR imaging with T1-weighted fat-suppressed and breath-hold FLASH sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991; 1: 625-632.
12. Nagelkerke NJD., A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991; 78: 691-692.
13. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB,. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15: 361-387. (Pubitemid 26072233)
14. Laupacis, A, Sekar N, Stiell, IG,. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997; 277: 488-494. (Pubitemid 27074334)
15. Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med. 2000; 19: 1059-1079. (Pubitemid 30238915)
16. Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A, et al. Mural inflammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology. 2009; 252: 712-720.
17. Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut. 2005; 54: 257-263. (Pubitemid 40139243)
18. Langhorst J, Kuhle CA, Ajaj W, et al. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007; 13: 1001-1008. (Pubitemid 47309972)
19. Knottnerus JA, van WC, Muris JW,. Evaluation of diagnostic procedures. BMJ. 2002; 324: 477-480.