Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act cost-containment choices: The case for incentive-based approaches

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 591-596

  Pauly, Mark V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST CONTROL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; TAX; UNITED STATES;

COST CONTROL; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; POLITICS; TAXES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79960236739     PISSN: 03616878     EISSN: 15271927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/03616878-1271315     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Newhouse, J. P. and the Insurance Experiment Group. 1993. Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Pauly, M. V. 2009. Limiting the Tax Exclusion for Employment-based Health Insurance: Are Improved Equity and Efficiency Enough? National Tax Journal 62, 555-562.
3. Shortell, S. M., L. P. Casalino, and E. S. Fisher. 2010. How the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Should Test Accountable Care Organizations. Health Affairs 29, 1293-1298