Promoting electronic health record adoption among small independent primary care practices

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 353-358

  Samantaray, Reena ^a   Njoku, Victoria O ^b   Brunner, Julian W M ^c   Raghavan, Veena ^d   Kendall, Mat L ^e   Shih, Sarah C ^d  

^a California Health Information Partnership and Services Organization   (United States)

^b ACCENTURE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

^e Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; NEW YORK; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79960232280     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. US Congress Conference Reports. Conference report on HR 1, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 111th Cong, 1st Sess (February 12, 2009). Cong Rec. 2009;155:H1307-H1516. http://www.conferencereport.gpoaccess.gov/. Accessed August 9, 2009.
2. Chaudhury B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and cost of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742-752. (Pubitemid 46780634)
3. Frieden TR, Mostashari F. Health care as if health mattered. J Am Med Inform. 2008;299(8):950-952. (Pubitemid 351397070)
4. Taylor R, Bower A, Girosi F, Bigelow J, Fonkych K, Hillestad R. Promoting health information technology: is there a case for more-aggressive government action? Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1234-1245.
5. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50-60. (Pubitemid 351931096)
6. Ford WE, Menachemi N, Peterson LT, Huerta TR. Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(3):274-281.
7. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(2):116-126. (Pubitemid 38471048)
8. Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, Sim I, Ganchoff C. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1127-1137. (Pubitemid 41577100)
9. Hing E, Hsiao CJ. Electronic Medical Record Use by Office-Based Physicians and Their Practices: United States, 2007. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. National health statistics report 23.
10. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. District Public Health Office. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/dpho/dpho.shtml. Accessed August 9, 2010.
11. Mostashari F, Tripathi M, Kendall M. A tale of two large community electronic health record extension projects. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):345-356.
12. Solberg LI. Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect. Implement Sci. 2006;1:e25.
13. Shin J, Ariely D. Keeping doors open: the effect of unavailability on incentives to keep options viable. Manag Sci. 2004;50:575-586.
14. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid EHR incentive payment schedule for eligible professionals. http://www.cms.gov/ EHRIncentivePrograms/35-Basics.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed February 17, 2011.