Airfoil design for compressible inviscid flow based on shape calculus

Optimization and Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 349-369

  Schmidt, Stephan ^a   Ilic, Caslav ^b   Schulz, Volker ^a   Gauger, Nicolas R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Drag reduction; Euler flow; One shot; Preconditioning; Shape derivative

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC DESIGNS; AIRFOIL DESIGN; AIRFOIL SHAPE; BOUNDARY INTEGRALS; DESIGN PARAMETERS; EULER FLOWS; HADAMARD; INVISCID FLOWS; MESH SENSITIVITY; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; ONE-SHOT; OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES; OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY; PRECONDITIONING; SHAPE CALCULUS; SHAPE DERIVATIVES; SHAPE DESIGN PARAMETERS; SHAPE GRADIENT; SURFACE MESH;

AERODYNAMIC DRAG; AIRFOILS; DESIGN; EULER EQUATIONS;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 79960230354     PISSN: 13894420     EISSN: 15732924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-011-9145-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arian E, Ta'asan S (1996) Analysis of the Hessian for aerodynamic optimization: Inviscid flow. Technical Report 96-28, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE).
2. Arian E, Vatsa VN (1998) A preconditioning method for shape optimization governed by the Euler equations. Technical Report 98-14, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE).
3. Delfour MC, Zolésio J-P (2001) Shapes and geometries: analysis, differential calculus, and optimization. In: Advances in design and control. SIAM, Philadelphia.
4. Eppler K, Schmidt S, Schulz V, Ilic C (2009) Preconditioning the pressure tracking in fluid dynamics by shape Hessian information. J Optim Theory Appl 141(3): 513-531.
5. Gauger NR (2003) Das Adjungiertenverfahren in der aerodynamischen Formoptimierung. Forschungsbericht DLR-FB-2003-05, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt eV.
6. Gherman I (2008) Approximate partially reduced SQP approaches for aerodynamic shape optimization problems. PhD thesis, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
7. Giles MB, Pierce NA (1997) Adjoint equations in CFD: duality, boundary conditions and solution behaviour. AIAA, 97-1850.
8. Haack W (1941) Geschoßformen kleinsten Wellenwiderstandes. Ber Lilienthal-Gesellschaft 136(1): 14-28.
9. Hazra SB, Schulz V (2004) Simultaneous pseudo-timestepping for PDE-model based optimization problems. BIT Numer Math 44(3): 457-472.
10. Hazra SB, Schulz V (2005) How to profit from adjoints in one-shot pseudotime-stepping optimization. In: Evolutionary and deterministic methods for design, optimization and control with applications to industrial problems, EUROGEN.
11. Hazra SB, Schulz V (2006) Simultaneous pseudo-timestepping for aerodynamic shape optimization problems with state constraints. SIAM J Sci Comput 28(3): 1078-1099.
12. Hicks RM, Henne PA (1978) Wing design by numerical optimization. J Aircr 15(7): 407-412.
13. Jameson A (1988) Aerodynamic design via control theory. J Sci Comput 3(3): 233-260.
14. Jameson A (1990) Automatic design of transonic airfoils to reduce the shock induced pressure drag. In: Proceedings of the 31st Israel annual conference on aviation and aeronautics, Tel Aviv, pp 5-17.
15. Jameson A (1994) Optimum aerodynamic design via boundary control. In: AGARD-VKI lecture series, optimum design methods in aerodynamics. von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode Saint Genese.
16. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E (1981) Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. In: AIAA 14th fluid and plasma dynamic conference, 23-25 June 1981, pp 1981-1259.
17. Kroll N, Schwamborn D, Becker K, Rieger H, Thiele F (eds) (2009) MEGADESIGN and MegaOpt-German initiatives for aerodynamic simulation and optimization in aircraft design. Springer, Berlin.
18. Nemec M, Zingg DW (2002) A Newton-Krylov algorithm for aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J 40(6): 1146-1154.
19. Nemec M, Zingg DW, Pulliam TH (2003) Multipoint and multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization. AIAA J 42(6): 1057-1065.
20. Schmidt S (2010) Efficient large scale aerodynamic design based on shape calculus. PhD thesis, University of Trier, Germany.
21. Schmidt S, Schulz V (2009) Impulse response approximations of discrete shape Hessians with application in CFD. SIAM J Control Optim 48(4): 2562-2580.
22. Schmidt S, Schulz V (2010) Shape derivatives for general objective functions and the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Control Cybern 39(3): 677-713.
23. Sokolowski J, Zolésio J-P (1992) Introduction to shape optimization: shape sensitivity analysis. Springer, Berlin.
24. Ta'asan S (1991) One-shot methods for optimal control of distributed parameter systems I: Finite dimensional control. ICASE, 91-2.
25. Ta'asan S, Kuruvila G, Salas MD (1991) Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot. AIAA, 92-0025.
26. Widhalm M, Ronzheimer A, Hepperle M (2007) Comparison between gradient-free and adjoint based aerodynamic optimization of a flying wing transport aircraft in the preliminary design. In: AIAA 25th applied aerodynamics conference, 25-28 June 2007. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York.