Interfacial damage in biopolymer composites reinforced using hemp fibres: Finite element simulation and experimental investigation

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 71, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1419-1426

  Hbib, M ^a   Guessasma, S ^a   Bassir, D ^b   Benseddiq, N ^c  

^a INRA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE BELFORT MONTBÉLIARD   (France)

^c UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

A. Fibres; B. Debonding; B. Interface; C. Damage mechanics; C. Finite element analysis (FEA)

Indexed keywords

A. FIBRES; B. DEBONDING; B. INTERFACE; C. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA); DAMAGE MECHANICS;

ELASTICITY; FIBERS; HEMP; HEMP FIBERS; TENSILE TESTING;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 79960218264     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Roulson D., Sain M., Couturier M. Resin transfer molding of hemp fiber composites: optimization of the process and mechanical properties of the materials. Compos Sci Technol 2006, 66:895.
2. Hepworth D.G., Bruce D.M., Vincent J.F.V., Jeronimidis G. The manufacture and mechanical testing of thermosetting natural fibre composites. J Mater Sci 2000, 35:293.
3. Saheb D., Jog J. Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol 1999, 18:351.
4. Herrmann A.S., Nickel J., Riedel U. Construction materials based upon biologically renewable resources - from components to finished parts. Polym Degrad Stabil 1998, 59:251.
5. Vilaseca F., Lopez A., Llauro X., Pelach M.A., Mutje P. Hemp strands as reinforcement of polystyrene composites. Chem Eng Res Des 2004, 82:1425.
6. Bodros E., Pillin I., Montrelay N., Baley C. Could biopolymers reinforced by randomly scattered flax fibre be used in structural applications?. Compos Sci Technol 2007, 67:462.
7. Pickering K.L., Beckermann G.W., Alam S.N., Foreman N.J. Optimising industrial hemp fibre for composites. Composite Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 2007, 38:461.
8. Stuart T., Liu Q., Hughes M., McCall R.D., Sharma H.S.S., Norton A. Structural biocomposites from flax - Part I: Effect of bio-technical fibre modification on composite properties. Composite Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 2006, 37:393.
9. Li Y., Pickering K.L. Hemp fibre reinforced composites using chelator and enzyme treatments. Compos Sci Technol 2008, 68:3293.
10. Pracella M., Chionna D., Anguillesi I., Kulinski Z., Piorkowska E. Functionalization, compatibilization and properties of polypropylene composites with Hemp fibres. Compos Sci Technol 2006, 66:2218.
11. Keller A. Compounding and mechanical properties of biodegradable hemp fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol 2003, 63:1307.
12. Cheung H.Y., Ho M.P., Lau K.T., Cardona F., Hui D. Natural fibre-reinforced composites for bioengineering and environmental engineering applications. Composites Part B-Eng 2009, 40:655.
13. Park J.M., Kim D.S., Kim S.R. Improvement of interfacial adhesion and nondestructive damage evaluation for plasma-treated PBO and Kevlar fibers/epoxy composites using micromechanical techniques and surface wettability (vol 264, pg 431, 2003). J Colloid Interf Sci 2003, 268-271.
14. Shaw L.L., Karpur P., Matikas T.E. Fracture strength and damage progression of the fiber/matrix interfaces in titanium-based MMCs with different interfacial layers. Composites Part B-Eng 1998, 29:331.
15. Santulli C. Post-impact damage characterisation on natural fibre reinforced composites using acoustic emission. NDT E Int 2001, 34:531.
16. Chen W.Q., Lee K.Y. Three-dimensional exact analysis of angle-ply laminates in cylindrical bending with interfacial damage via state-space method. Compos Struct 2004, 64:275.
17. Raghavan P., Ghosh S. A continuum damage mechanics model for unidirectional composites undergoing interfacial debonding. Mech Mater 2005, 37:955.
18. Cannmo P., Mahler L., Runesson K. Modelling of interfacial viscoplastic slip coupled to damage in a polycrystalline microstructure. Comput Mech 1997, 20:12.
19. Voyiadjis G.Z., Park T. Local and interfacial damage analysis of metal matrix composites using the finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 1997, 56:483.
20. Voyiadjis G.Z., Park T. Local and interfacial damage analysis of metal-matrix composites. Int J Eng Sci 1995, 33:1595.
21. Lemaitre J., Desmorat R. Engineering damage mechanics ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures 2005, Springer.
22. Ananth C.R., Voleti S.R., Chandra N. Effect of fiber fracture and interfacial debonding on the evolution of damage in metal matrix composites. Composite Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 1998, 29:1203.
23. Benabou L., Benseddiq N., Nait-Abdelaziz M. Comparative analysis of damage at interfaces of composites. Composites: Part B 2002, 33:215.
24. Hachemi A., Weichert D. On the problem of interfacial damage in fibre-reinforced composites under variable loads. Mech Res Commun 2005, 32:15.
25. Rjafiallah S., Guessasma S. Three-phase model and digital image correlation to assess the interphase effect on the elasticity of carbohydrate polymer-based composites reinforced with glass silica beads. Carbohyd Polym 2011, 83:246.
26. Guessasma S., Benseddiq N., Lourdin D. Effective Young's modulus of biopolymer composites with imperfect interface. Int J Solids Struct 2010, 47:2436.
27. Park J.M., Kim D.S., Kim S.R. Improvement of interfacial adhesion and nondestructive damage evaluation for plasma-treated PBO and Kevlar fibers/epoxy composites using micromechanical techniques and surface wettability. J Colloid Interf Sci 2003, 264:431.
28. Guessasma S., Hamdi A., Lourdin D. Linear modelling of biopolymer systems and related mechanical properties. Carbohyd Polym 2009, 76:381.
29. Bassir H., Guessasma S., Boubakar L. Hybrid computational strategy based on ANN and GAPS: application for identification of a non-linear model of composite material. J Compos Struct 2009, 88:262.