Roux en y gastric bypass by single-incision mini-laparotomy: Outcomes in 3,300 consecutive patients

Obesity Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 820-824

  Caruana, Joseph A ^a,b,c   McCabe, Marc N ^a,c   Smith, Audrey D ^c   Stawiasz, Karen A ^a   Kabakov, Eran ^c   Kabakov, Julia M ^c  

^a SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c Synergy Bariatrics   (United States)

Author keywords

Open gastric bypass; Outcomes; Weight loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERNAL HERNIA; LAPAROTOMY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBESITY; OBESITY SURGERY MORTALITY RISK SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CODING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROUX Y ANASTOMOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE INCISION MINI LAPAROTOMY; STOMACH BYPASS; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ULCER; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; GASTRIC BYPASS; HUMANS; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 79960213253     PISSN: 09608923     EISSN: 17080428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0394-1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery by the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium 2009 N Engl J Med 361 445 454 10.1056/NEJMoa0901836
2. PR Schauer B Burguera S Ikramuddin, et al. 2003 Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus Ann Surg 238 467 484 14530719
3. H Buchwald Y Avidor E Braunwald, et al. 2004 Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA 292 1724 1737 15479938 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1OjtLg%3D (Pubitemid 39346675)
4. S Rasheid M Banasiak SF Gallagher, et al. 2003 Gastric bypass is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with clinically significant obesity Obes Surg 13 58 61 12630614 10.1381/096089203321136593 (Pubitemid 36250239)
5. M Martin A Beekley R Ljorstad, et al. 2010 Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis SOARD 6 8 15
6. JA Caruana PM Anain DT Pham 2009 The pulmonary embolism risk score system reduces the incidence and mortality of pulmonary embolism after gastric bypass Surgery 146 678 683 19789027 10.1016/j.surg.2009.07.011
7. EJ DeMaria D Portenier L Wolfe 2007 Obesity surgery mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass SOARD 3 134 140 (Pubitemid 46444703)
8. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, et al. SAS system for mixed models. Cary: SAS; 1996.
9. WE Weller C Rosati 2008 Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery Ann Surg 248 10 15 18580201 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d953a
10. NT Nguyen M Hinojosa C Faya, et al. 2007 Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers J Am Coll Surg 205 248 255 17660071 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.011 (Pubitemid 47095420)
11. YD Podnos JC Jimenez SE Wilson, et al. 2003 Complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a review of 3464 cases Arch Surg 138 957 961 12963651 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.957 (Pubitemid 37099869)
12. MM Hutter S Randall S Khuri, et al. 2006 Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Ann Surg 243 657 666 16633001 10.1097/01.sla.0000216784.05951.0b
13. M Bessler A Daud MF DiGiorgi, et al. 2008 Frequency distribution of weight loss percentage after gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding SOARD 4 486 491 (Pubitemid 352006167)
14. JB Dixon T McPhail PE O'Brien 2005 Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal Obes Surg 15 1034 1039 16105403 10.1381/0960892054621053 (Pubitemid 41116890)