Use and variation of French diacritics on an Internet dating site

Journal of French Language Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 131-148

  Van Compernolle, Rémi A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960210812     PISSN: 09592695     EISSN: 14740079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0959269510000293     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anis, J. (1999). Chats et usages graphiques du français. In: J. Anis (ed.), Internet Communication et Langue Française. Paris: Hermès Sciences, pp. 71-90.
2. Anis, J. (2007). Neography: Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. In: B. Danet and S. C. Herring (eds), The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87-115.
3. Ayres-Bennett, W. (1994). A History of the French Language through Texts. London: Routledge.
4. Bailey, G. (2002). Real and apparent time. In: J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, and N. Shilling-Estes (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 312-332.
5. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A. and Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the 'true self' on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58: 33-48. (Pubitemid 34268217)
6. Baron, N. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Ben-Ze'ev, A. (2004). Love Online: Emotions on the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cheshire, J. (2002). Sex and gender in variationist research. In: J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, and N. Shilling-Estes (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 423-443.
9. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Curzan, A. (2000). The end of Modern English? American Speech, 75: 299-301.
12. Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Selfpresentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11: 415-441.
13. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.
14. Groom, C. J. and Pennebaker, J. W. (2005). The language of love: Sex, sexual orientation, and language use in online personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 52: 447-461. (Pubitemid 40669759)
15. Hardey,M. (2004). Mediated relationships: Authenticity and the possibility of romance. Information, Communication and Society, 7: 207-222.
16. Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In: D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. E. Hamilton (eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 612-634.
17. Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36: 109-168. (Pubitemid 36390878)
18. Herring, S. C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computermediated communication. New Media & Society, 6: 26-36. (Pubitemid 38214399)
19. Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4: Article 1 [np]. Retrieved February 22, 2008 from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761/index- html/
20. Labov, W. (1963). The social motivations of a sound change. Word, 19: 273-309.
21. Labov,W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City.Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
22. Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2: 205-254.
23. Liénard, F. (2007). Analyse linguistique et pragmatique de l'écriture électronique: Le cas du SMS tchaté. In: J. Gerbault (ed), La Langue du Cyberespace : De la Diversité aux Normes. Paris : L'Harmattan, pp. 265-278.
24. McLaughlin, M. L., Osbourne, K. K., and Ellison, N. (1997). Virtual community in a telepresence environment. In: S. G. Jones (ed), Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 146-168.
25. Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1997). Varieties and variation. In F. Coulmas (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47-64.
26. Netclub. (2008a). Netclub.com homepage (French). Retrieved February 21, 2008 from http://www.netclub.com/index2.asp
27. Netclub. (2008b). Netclub.com publicité. Retrieved February 21, 2008 from http://www.netclub.com/aide/publicite.asp
28. Paolillo, J. C. (2002). Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
29. Parks, M. R. and Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46: 80-97.
30. Pellat, J-C. and Andrieux-Reix, N. (2006). Histoire d'É ou de la variation des usages graphiquesàla différentiation réglée. Langue Française, 151 : 7-24.
31. Pierozak, I. (2003). Le Français Tchaté. Une Étude en Trois Dimensions-Sociolinguistique, Syntaxique et Graphique-d'usages d'IRC. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Provence Aix-Marseille I.
32. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: A new way to look at ourselves and our kids. On the Horizon, 9: [np]. Retrieved March 5, 2008 from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/.
33. Rickard, P. (1993). A History of the French Language. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
34. Roberts, L. D. and Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 2: 521-540.
35. Sankoff, D., Tagliamonte, S. and Smith, E. (2005). Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
36. Sigley, R. (2003). The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change, 15: 227-253.
37. Tagliamonte, S. A. (2006). Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
39. Tapscott, D. (1999). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1: [np]. Retrieved February 22, 2008 from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
41. van Compernolle, R. A. (2008a). Sociopragmatic norms in Québébcois online dating advertisements. In: M-C Koop (ed), Le Québecàl'Aube du Nouveau Millénaire: Entre Tradition et Modernité. Québec, Canada : Presses de l'Université du Québec, pp. 139-147.
42. van Compernolle, R. A. (2008b). Language variation in online personal ads from Quebec: The case of ne. Language@Internet, 5: Article 1 [np]. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1666/index- html/
43. van Compernolle, R. A. (2008c). Second-person pronoun use and address strategies in on-line personal advertisements from Quebec. Journal of Pragmatics, 40: 2062-2076.
44. van Compernolle, R. A., and Williams, L. (in press). Orthographic variation in electronic French: The case of l'accent aigu. French Review.
45. Warschauer, M. and Grimes, D. (2008). Audience, authorship, and artifact: The emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27: 1-23.
46. Watts, F. (1991). Réflexions sur la proposition de réforme de l'orthographe et sa polémique. The French Review, 65: 84-90.
47. Whitty, M. T. and Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace Romance: The Psychology of Online Relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
48. Yurchisin, J., Watchravesringkan, K. and McCabe, D. B. (2005). An exploration of identity re-creation in the context of Internet dating. Social Behavior and Personality, 33: 735-750. (Pubitemid 41766165)