Forms of inattentiveness: The production of blindness in the development of a technology for the observation of quality in health services

Organization Studies

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 963-989

  Knudsen, Morten ^a  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

Author keywords

attention; decision making; inattentiveness; Luhmann; observation; quality technology; systems theory; transparency; visibility device

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960206819     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840611410827     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.S. (1962). Two faces of power. In F. G. Castles, D. J. Murray, & D.C. Potter (Eds.), Decision, organisations and society (pp. 947-952). London: Penguin.
2. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.S. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. The American Political Science Review, 57, 632-642.
3. Baecker, D. (Ed.) (1993a). Probleme der Form. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
4. Baecker, D. (Ed.) (1993b). Kalkül der Form. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
5. Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84, 517-538.
6. Blomgren, M. (2007). The drive for transparency: Organizational field transformations in Swedish health care. Public Administration, 85, 67-82.
7. Berg, M., & Timmermans, S. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
8. Boström, M., & Garsten, C. (Eds.). (2008). Organizing transnational accountability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. London: MIT Press.
10. Brandum, L., Pedersen, S., & Ottesen, E. (2010). Mellem tilpasning og afsporing. Om beslutningen af Den Danske Kvalitetsmodel. In M. Knudsen, & E.Z. Bentsen (Eds.), Kamp, kommunikation og kompleksitet. Ledelse og fortolkninger i det danske sundhedsvæsen (pp. 101-124). Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolens forlag.
11. Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B.,et al.(2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F.W. (2009). Sociology and complexity science: A new field of inquiry. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
13. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
14. Cyert, R.M. (1990). Defining leadership and explicating the process. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 1, 29-38.
15. Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). Behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Esposito, E. (1996). Observing interpretation: A sociological view of hermeneutics. MLN, 111, 593-619.
17. Færgeman, O. (2002). Evidensbaseret medicin, sundhedspolitik og administrativ kontrol med lægers arbejde. Ugeskrift for læger, 164, 1538-1543.
18. Gabriel, Y., Hirschhorn, L., McCollom Hampton, M., Schwartz, H.S., & Swogger, G. (1999). Organizations in depth: The psychoanalysis of organizations. London: SAGE.
19. Garsten, C., & de Montoya, M. L. (Eds.) (2008). Transparency in a new global order. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
20. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
21. Groene, O., Klazinga, N., Kazandjian, V., Lombrail, P., & Bartels, P. (2008). The World Health Organization Performance Assessment Tool for Quality Improvement in Hospitals (PATH): An analysis of the pilot implementation in 37 hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20, 155-161.
22. Grossman, E., Luque, E., & Muniesa, F. (2008). Economies through transparency. In C. Garsten & M. L. de Montoya (Eds.), Transparency in a new global order (pp. 97-121). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23. Gulbrandsen, L.H. (2008). Organizing accountability in transnational standards organizations: The Forest Stewardship Council as a good governance model. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 61-79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24. Haugaard, M. (1997). The Constitution of power: A theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
25. Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? Proceedings of the British Academy 135 (pp. 25-43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? Proceedings of the British Academy 135 (pp. 3-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9, 191-210.
28. Kerwer, D. (2008). Watchdogs beyond control? The accountability of accounting standards organizations. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 98-113). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29. Knudsen, M. (2005). Displacing the paradox of decision-making: The management of contingency in the modernization of a Danish county. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (pp. 107-126). Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
30. Knudse, M. (2006). Autolysis within organizations: A case study, Soziale Systeme, 12, 79-99.
31. Knudsen, M. (2007). Structural couplings between organizations and function systems: Looking at standards in health care. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14, 111-131.
32. Knudsen, M. (2011). Surprised by method: Functional method and systems theory. Historical Social Research, 36, 124-142.
33. Levay, C., & Waks, C. (Eds.) (2006). Strävan efter transparens: granskning, styrning och organisering i sjukvårdens nätverk. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
34. Levay, C., & Waks, C. (2009). Professions and the pursuit of transparency in healthcare: Two cases of soft autonomy, Organization Studies, 30, 509-527.
35. Luhmann, N. (1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
36. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Luhmann, N. (1997). The control of intransparency. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14, 359-371.
38. Luhmann, N., & Fuchs, P. (1989). Reden und Schweigen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
39. March, J.G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587-608.
40. March, J.G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. London: Basil Blackwell.
41. March, J.G., & Simon, H. (1993 [1958]). Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Merton, R.K. (1963[1957]). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
43. Miller, K.D. (2008). Simon and Polanyi on rationality and knowledge. Organization Studies, 29, 933-955.
44. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
45. Moore, W.E., & Tumin, M.M. (1949). Some social functions of ignorance. American Sociological Review, 14, 787-795.
46. Munro, R., & Mouritsen, J. (Eds.) (1996). Accountability: Power, ethos and the technologies of managing. London: International Thomson Business Press.
47. Neyland, D. (2007). Achieving transparency: The visible, invisible and divisible in academic accountability networks. Organization, 14, 499-516.
48. Porter, T.M. (1994). Making things quantitative. Science in Context, 7, 389-407.
49. Power, M. (1994). The audit society. In A. G. Hopwood & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practice (pp. 299-316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 289-315.
51. Power, M. (1997). The Audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Power, M. (2008). Foreword. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. xv-xvii). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
53. Roberts, J.S., Coale, J.G., & Redman, R.R. (1987). A history of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. JAMA, 258, 936-940.
54. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Scrivens, E. (1995). Accreditation: Protecting the professional or the consumer? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
56. Seidl, D. (2007). The dark side of knowledge. E:CO, 9/3, 16-29.
57. Shaw, C.D. (2000). External quality mechanisms for health care: Summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 12, 169-175.
58. Shaw, C.D. (2003). Evaluation accreditation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15, 455-456.
59. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 57-89). London: Routledge.
60. Simmel, G. (1992 [1908]). Soziologie. Undersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Gesamtausgabe Band 11. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
61. Sloterdijk, P. (1983). Kritik der zynischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
62. Strauss, A.L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. (1997). Social organization of medical work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
63. Thedvall, R. (2008a). Transparency at work: The production of indicators for EU employment policy. In Garsten, C. & M. L. de Montoya (Eds.), Transparency in a new global order (pp. 143-159). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64. Thedvall, R. (2008b). Rituals of legitimation: Organizing accountability in EU employment policy. In M. Boström & C. Garsten (Eds.), Organizing transnational accountability (pp. 131-146). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
65. Timmermans, S., Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (1998). The architecture of difference. In M. Berg & A. Mol, (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 202-225). Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.
66. Walshe, K., Wallace, L., Freeman, T., Latham, L., & Spurgeon, P. (2001). The external review of quality improvement in health care organizations: A qualitative study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13, 367-374.
67. West, H. G., & Sanders, T. (Eds.) (2003). Transparency and conspiracy: Ethnographies of suspicion in the new world order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
68. Zizek, S. (1997). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
69. vretveit, J. (2001). Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 16, 229-241.
70. vretveit, J. (2003). What are the best strategies for ensuring quality in hospitals? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.