The fiscal-geographic nexus: An overview of fiscal impact assessment in local policy development

Applied Geography

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 54-60

  Lamie, R David ^a   Campbell, Wallace ^a   Molnar, William ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community development; Fiscal impact assessment; Fiscal policy; Local government; Regional economics

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; FISCAL POLICY; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; REGIONAL ECONOMY;

EID: 79960183809     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Farmland Trust Fact sheet: Cost of community services studies 2007, American Farmland Trust, Washington, D.C. http://www.farmlandinfo.org.
2. Burchell Robert W., Shad N.A., Listokin D., Phillips H., Downs A., Seskin S. The costs of sprawl-revisited 1998, Transportation research board. Report No. 39, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
3. Burchell Robert W., Listokin David, Dolphin William R. The new practitioner's guide to fiscal impact analysis 1985, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ.
4. Delaney John J., LarryGordon A., Hess Kathryn J. The needs-nexus analysis: a unified test for validating subdivision exactions, user impact fees, and linkage. Law and Contemporary Problems 1987, Vol. 50. No. 1.
5. Dorfman Jeffrey The economics of smart growth: dollars and sense for local governments. Southern Rural Development Center 2004, Vol. 7. No. 1.
6. International Association for Impact Analysis http://www.iaia.org/default.aspx.
7. Community policy analysis modeling 2006, Blackwell Professional Publishing, Oxford. T.G. Johnson, D. Otto, S.C. Deller (Eds.).
8. Lamie David R., Molnar William, Campbell Wallace An assessment of the fiscal impact of projected population growth in Anderson county, South Carolina 2008-2028: A report to the Anderson county council 2008, Clemson Institute for Economic and Community Development and the EDA University Center for Economic Development, Clemson, SC.
9. Nelson Arthur, Bowles Liza K., Juergensmeyer Julian C., Nicholas James C. A guide to impact fees and housing affordability 2008, Island Press, Washington, DC.
10. Nelson Arthur, Dawkins Casey Urban containment in the United States 2004, American Planning Association, Chicago.
11. Puget Sound Regional Council VISION 2020+20 update: Information paper on the cost of sprawl 2005, http://www.psrc.org/projects/vision/pubs/costofsprawl.pdf.
12. Renkow Mitch Population deconcentration and the rural south. Southern Rural Development Center 2004, Vol. 7. No 1.
13. Rural Policy Research Institute (RUPRI) 6/1/2010. http://www.rupri.org/panelandnetworkviewer.php%3Fid%3D12
14. South Carolina Department of Education http://ed.sc.gov/agency/offices/finance/insite/index.html.
15. The Harvard Law Review Association Municipal development exactions, the rational nexus test, and the federal constitution. Harvard Law Review 1989, Vol. 102. No. 1.