The potential impact of reproducibility of gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: A multi-institutional study

Journal of Urology

Volumn 186, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 465-469

  McKenney, Jesse K ^a   Simko, Jeff ^c   Bonham, Michael ^c   True, Lawrence D ^f   Troyer, Dean ^h   Hawley, Sarah ^e   Newcomb, Lisa F ^g   Fazli, Ladan ⁱ   Kunju, Lakshmi P ^j   Nicolas, Marlo M ^k   Vakar Lopez, Funda ^f   Zhang, Xiaotun ^g   Carroll, Peter R ^d   Brooks, James D ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Canary Foundation   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

ⁱ VANCOUVER PROSTATE CENTRE   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^k Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

adenocarcinoma; biopsy; pathology; prostate; reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79960182780     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.115     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. L.F. Newcomb, J.D. Brooks, and P.R. Carroll Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study: design of a multi-institutional active surveillance cohort and biorepository Urology 75 2010 407
2. M.A. Dall'Era, B.R. Konety, and J.E. Cowan Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort Cancer 112 2008 2664
3. S.R. Harlan, M.R. Cooperberg, and E.P. Elkin Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE J Urol 170 2003 1804
4. M.V. Meng, E.P. Elkin, and S.R. Harlan Predictors of treatment after initial surveillance in men with prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE J Urol 170 2003 2279
5. C. Warlick, B.J. Trock, and P. Landis Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome J Natl Cancer Inst 98 2006 355
6. J.I. Epstein, A.W. Partin, and J. Sauvageot Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up Am J Surg Pathol 20 1996 286
7. M.L. Blute, E.J. Bergstralh, and A.W. Partin Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol 164 2000 1591
8. M.R. Cooperberg, J.M. Broering, and P.R. Carroll Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis J Natl Cancer Inst 101 2009 878
9. M.B. Amin, D.J. Grignon, and P.A. Humphrey Reproducibility of the Gleason system Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Contemporary Approach 2004 Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia
10. J.I. Epstein, W.C. Allsbrook Jr, and M.B. Amin The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 29 2005 1228
11. M. Latour, M.B. Amin, and A. Billis Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology Am J Surg Pathol 32 2008 1532
12. T.L. Lotan, and J.I. Epstein Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma with glomeruloid features on needle biopsy Hum Pathol 40 2009 471
13. J.I. Epstein Gleason score 24 adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: a diagnosis that should not be made Am J Surg Pathol 24 2000 477
14. J.R. Landis, and G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159
15. R.J. Light, and B.H. Margolin An analysis of variance for categorical data J Am Stat Ass 66 1971 534
16. B. Efron Better bootstrap confidence intervals J Am Stat Ass 82 1987 171
17. D.F. Gleason Classification of prostatic carcinomas Cancer Chemother Rep 50 1966 125
18. S.B. Edge, D.R. Byrd, and C.C. Compton AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th ed. 2010 Springer New York
19. J.I. Epstein, F. Algaba, and W.C. Allsbrook Jr Acinar adenocarcinoma J.N. Eble, G. Sauter, J.I. Epstein, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours 2004 IARC Press Lyon 162 192
20. T.L. Lotan, and J.I. Epstein Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system Nat Rev Urol 7 2010 136
21. P.C. Albertsen, J.A. Hanley, and G.H. Barrows Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon J Natl Cancer Inst 97 2005 1248
22. S.W. Fine, and J.I. Epstein A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score J Urol 179 2008 1335
23. J.I. Epstein An update of the Gleason grading system J Urol 183 2010 433
24. G.P. Paner, R.E. Jimenez, and J.K. McKenney Jr Acinar adenocarcinoma M.B. Amin, J.K. McKenney, S.K. Tickoo, Diagnostic Pathology: Genitourinary 2010 Amirsys Salt Lake City 3 72
25. B. Delahunt, D.S. Lamb, and J.R. Srigley Gleason scoring: a comparison of classical and modified (international society of urological pathology) criteria using nadir PSA as a clinical end point Pathology 42 2009 339
26. B. Delahunt, J.R. Srigley, and D.S. Lamb Gleason grading: consensus and controversy Pathology 41 2009 613
27. L. Egevad, F. Algaba, and D.M. Berney Digital slides for standardization of Gleason grading by international experts Mod Pathol 23 2010 188A abstract 829
28. W.C. Allsbrook Jr, K.A. Mangold, and M.H. Johnson Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists Hum Pathol 32 2001 74
29. B. Helpap, and L. Egevad The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics Urologe A 46 2007 59
30. L. True, I. Coleman, and S. Hawley A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 2006 10991