Towards intelligent user interfaces: Anticipating actions in computer games

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Koesling, Hendrik ^a   Kenny, Alan ^b   Finke, Andrea ^a   Ritter, Helge ^a   McLoone, Seamus ^b   Ward, Tomas ^b  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Attention; Decision making; Eye movements; FPS games; Gaze control; HCI; Mindset; User interface

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ATTENTION; FPS GAMES; GAZE CONTROL; MINDSET;

DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENTS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 79960173754     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1983302.1983306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J. Flanagan and R. Johansson. Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424:769-771, 2003. (Pubitemid 37021704)
2. P. Gerjets. Zur Verknüpfung psychologischer Handlungs- und Kognitionstheorien: Die strukturalistische Konstruktion intertheoretischer Bänder am Beispiel von Rubikontheorie der Handlungsphasen und ACT-Theorie. Lang, Frankfurt a.M., 1995.
3. J. J. Gibson and A. D. Pick. Perception of another person's looking behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 76:386-394, 1963.
4. P. Gollwitzer. Das Rubikonmodell der Handlungsphasen. In J. Kuhl and H. Heckhausen, editors, Motivation, Volition und Handlung (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C, Theorie und Forschung: Motivation und Emotion), pages 531-582, Bern, Gttingen, Seattle, Toronto, 1996. Hogrefe.
5. P. Gollwitzer. Implementation intentions - strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 7:493-503-710, 1999.
6. P. Gollwitzer and U. Bayer. Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope, editors, Dual-process theories in social psychology, pages 531-582, New York, 1999. Guilford Press.
7. T. Goschke. Zur Funktionsanalyse des Willens: Integration kognitions-, motivations- und neuropsychologischer Perspektiven. Psychologische Beiträge, 39:375-412, 1997.
8. H. Heckhausen. Motivation und Handeln. Springer, Berlin, 2nd edition, 1989.
9. O. Höner, H. Koesling, and H. Tackenberg. Kognitive Orientierungen und Blickbewegungen beim Entscheidungsverhalten im Sportspiel - Entwicklung und Validierung eines Meßinstrumentariums. In R. Seiler, D. Birrer, J. Schmid, and S. Valkanover, editors, Sportpsychologie: Anforderungen, Anwendungen, Auswirkungen, pages 164-166, Köln, 2001. bps.
10. P. Isokoski and M. Benoit. Eye tracker input in first person shooter games. Proceedings 2nd Conference on Communication by Gaze Interaction: Communication by Gaze Interaction: Gazing into the Future, pages 78-81, 2006.
11. E. Jönsson. If looks could kill - an evaluation of eye tracking in computer games. Master's Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
12. J. Kilner, C. Vargas, S. Duval, S. Blakemore, and A. Sirigu. Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7:1299-1301, 2004. (Pubitemid 41057751)
13. C. Kleinke. Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100:78-100, 1986.
14. H. Koesling and O. Höner. Bend it like beckham - mindsets and visual attention in decision-making in soccer. Proceedings 12th European Conference on Eye Movements, 2003.
15. J. Kuhl. Action control: The maintenance of motivational states. In F. Halisch and J. Kuhl, editors, Motivation, Intention and Volition, pages 279-291, Berlin, 1987. Springer.
16. P. Mirenda, A. Donnellan, and D. Yoder. Gaze behavior, a new look at an old problem. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13:397-409, 1983. (Pubitemid 14193796)
17. S. Pannasch, J. R. Helmert, K. Roth, A. Herbold, and H. Walter. Visual fixation durations and saccadic amplitudes: Shifting relationship in a variety of conditions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2:1-19, 2008.
18. M. Pomplun, L. Sichelschmidt, K. Wagner, T. Clermont, G. Rickheit, and H. Ritter. Comparative visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science, 25:3-36, 2001.
19. A. Senju, T. Hasegawa, and Y. Tojo. Does perceived direct gaze boost detection in adults and children with and without autism? the stare-in-the-crowd effect revisited. Visual Cognition, 12:1474-1496, 2005. (Pubitemid 41684243)
20. L. Sichelschmmidt, K. Jang, H. Koesling, H. Ritter, and P. Weiss. Alignment in aufgabenorientierten Dialogen: Ein multimodales Such- und Vergleichs-Korpus. Linguistische Berichte, 122:205-230, 2010.
21. M. Von Grünau and C. Anston. The detection of gaze direction: a stare-in-the-crowd effect. Percetion, 24:1297-1313, 1995.
22. A. Williams, K. Davids., and J. Williams. Visual Perception & Action in Sport. Routledge, London, 1999.