Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search

Engineering Structures

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2716-2723

  Bekdaş, Gebrail ^a   Nigdeli, Sinan Melih ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Harmony search; Optimization; Structural control; Structural dynamics; Tuned mass damper

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION; ENGINEERING PROBLEMS; HARMONIC LOADING; HARMONY SEARCH; MASS DAMPERS; MATLAB PROGRAM; NUMERICAL ITERATION; NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATIONS; OPTIMIZATION CRITERIA; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; OPTIMUM PARAMETERS; PEAK VALUES; SEISMIC EXCITATIONS; STRUCTURAL CONTROL; TIME-DOMAIN SIMULATIONS; TUNED MASS DAMPERS;

ACOUSTIC DEVICES; EARTHQUAKES; MATLAB; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; VIBRATION CONTROL;

STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMPING; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ESTIMATION METHOD; HEURISTICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 79960172190     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc. (RWDI) Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Photos of Taipei 101. For further details see: (accessed 30.03.2011). http://www.rwdi.com/project/taipei_101.
2. Taipei Financial Center Corp. Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. Photos of Taipei 101. For further details see: (accessed 30.03.2011). http://www.taipei-101.com.tw/.
3. Frahm H. Device for damping of bodies. US Patent No: 989,958. 1911.
4. Ormondroyd J., Den Hartog J.P. The theory of dynamic vibration absorber. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 1928, 50:9-22.
5. Den Hartog J.P. Mechanical vibrations 1947, McGraw-Hill, New York. 3rd ed.
6. Bishop RED, Welboum DB. The problem of the dynamic vibration absorber. Engineering (London) 1952; 174 and 769.
7. Snowdon J.C. Steady-state behavior of the dynamic absorber. J Acoust Soc Am 1959, 31:1096-1103.
8. Falcon K.C., Stone B.J., Simcock W.D., Andrew C. Optimization of vibration absorbers: A graphical method for use on idealized systems with restricted damping. J Mech Eng Sci 1967, 9:374-381.
9. Ioi T., Ikeda K. On the dynamic vibration damped absorber of the vibration system. Bull JSME 1978, 21:64-71.
10. Warburton G.B., Ayorinde E.O. Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1980, 8:197-217.
11. Thompson A.G. Optimum damping and tuning of a dynamic vibration absorber applied to a force excited and damped primary system. J Sound Vib 1981, 77:403-415.
12. Warburton G.B. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1982, 10:381-401.
13. Villaverde R. Reduction in seismic response with heavily-damped vibration absorbers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1985, 13:33-42.
14. Villaverde R., Koyama L.A. Damped resonant appendages to increase inherent damping in buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1993, 22:491-507.
15. Villaverde R., Martin S.C. Passive seismic control of cable-stayed bridges with damped resonant appendages. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1995, 24:233-246.
16. Sadek F., Mohraz B., Taylor A.W., Chung R.M. A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1997, 26:617-635.
17. Kareem A. Modelling of base-isolated buildings with passive dampers under winds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1997, 72:323-333.
18. Rana R., Soong T.T. Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 1998, 20:193-204.
19. Yau J.-D., Yang Y.-B. A wideband MTMD system for reducing the dynamic response of continuous truss bridges to moving train loads. Eng Struct 2004, 26:1795-1807.
20. Lee C.-L., Chen Y.-T., Chung L.-L., Wang Y.-P. Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 2006, 28:43-53.
21. Li C., Qu W. Optimum properties of multiple tuned mass dampers for reduction of translational and torsional response of structures subject to ground acceleration. Eng Struct 2006, 28:472-494.
22. Carotti A., Turci E. A tuning criterion for the inertial tuned damper. Design using phasors in the Argand-Gauss plane. Appl Math Model 1999, 23:199-217.
23. Chang C.C. Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control. Eng Struct 1999, 21:454-463.
24. Lin C.C., Wang J.F., Ueng J.M. Vibration Control identification of seismically excited m.d.o.f structure-PTMD systems. J Sound Vib 2001, 240:87-115.
25. Aldemir U. Optimal control of structures with semiactive-tuned mass dampers. J Sound Vib 2003, 266:847-874.
26. Lee C.L., Chen Y.T., Chung L.L., Wang Y.P. Optimal design theories and applications of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 2006, 28:43-53.
27. Bakre S.V., Jangid R.S. Optimal parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system. Struct Control Health Monit 2007, 14:448-470.
28. Ründinger F. Tuned mass damper with nonlinear viscous damping. J Sound Vib 2007, 300:932-948.
29. Hoang N., Fujino Y., Warnitchai P. Optimum tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas. Eng Struct 2008, 30:707-715.
30. Marano G.C., Greco R., Chiaia B. A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design. J Sound Vib 2010, 329:4880-4890.
31. Weber B., Feltrin G. Assessment of long-term behavior of tuned mass dampers by system identification. Eng Struct 2010, 32:3670-3682.
32. Holland J.H. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems 1975, Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
33. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning 1989, Addison Wesley, Boston, MA.
34. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks No. IV, 1995. p. 1942-8.
35. Dorigo M., Maniezzo V., Colorni A. The ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 1996, 26:29-41.
36. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C., Vecchi M. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220:671-680.
37. Erol O.K., Eksin I. A new optimization method: Big bang big crunch. Adv Eng Softw 2006, 37:106-111.
38. Geem Z.W., Kim J.H., Loganathan G.V. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search. Simulation 2001, 76:60-68.
39. Hadi M.N.S., Arfiadi Y. Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 1998, 124:1272-1280.
40. Singh M.P., Singh S., Moreschi L.M. Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002, 31:749-769.
41. Desu N.B., Deb S.K., Dutta A. Coupled tuned mass dampers for control of coupled vibrations in asymmetric buildings. Struct Control Health Monit 2006, 13:897-916.
42. Pourzeynali S., Lavasani H.H., Modarayi A.H. Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms. Eng Struct 2007, 29:346-357.
43. Leung A.Y.T., Zhang H. Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 2009, 31:715-728.
44. Leung A.Y.T., Zhang H., Cheng C.C., Lee Y.Y. Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary base excitation during earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2008, 37:1223-1246.
45. Lee K.S., Geem Z.W., Lee S.H., Bae K.W. The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization. Eng Optim 2005, 37:663-684.
46. Lee K.S., Geem Z.W. A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: Harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2005, 194:3902-3933.
47. Geem Z.W. Novel derivative of harmony search algorithm for discrete design variables. Appl Math Comput 2008, 199:223-230.
48. Geem Z.W., Kim J.H., Loganathan G.V. Harmony search optimization: Application to pipe network design. Internat J Model Simul 2002, 22:125-133.
49. Geem Z.W., Tseng C., Park Y. Harmony search for generalized orienteering problem: Best touring in China. Springer Lecture Notes in Comput Sci 2005, 3412:741-750.
50. Lee K.S., Geem Z.W. A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput & Structures 2004, 82:781-798.
51. Saka M.P. Optimum design of steel sway frames to BS5950 using harmony search algorithm. J Construct Steel Res 2009, 65:36-43.
52. Erdal F., Saka M.P. Harmony search based algorithm for the optimum design of grillage systems to LRFD-AISC. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2009, 38:25-41.
53. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of structures 1993, Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York.
54. Hart G.C., Wong K. Structural dynamics for structural engineering 1999, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
55. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering 2001, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
56. Geem Z.W., Sim K.-B. Parameter setting free harmony search algorithm. Appl Math Comput 2010, 217:3881-3889.
57. Hasancebi O., Erdal F., Saka M.P. Adaptive harmony search method for structural optimization. J Struct Eng 2010, 136:419-431.
58. Singh M.P., Matheu E.E., Suarez L.E. Active and semi-active control of structures under seismic excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1997, 26:193-213.