Goodwin or Kalecki in demand? functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the short run

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 506-522

  Stockhammer, Engelbert ^a   Stehrer, Robert ^b  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies   (Austria)

Author keywords

demand; functional income distribution; Goodwin cycle; Kalecki; Marxian economics; post Keynesian economics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960156337     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: 15528502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613411402642     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barbosa-Filho N.,Taylor L.Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy - a structuralist Goodwin model.Metroeconomica. 2006;57 (3): 389-411.
2. Bhaduri A.,Marglin S.Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis for contesting political ideologies.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1990;14:375-93.
3. Blecker R.International competition, income distribution and economic growth.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1989;13:395-412.
4. Blecker R. Kaleckian macromodels for open economies. Foundations of international economics: Post Keynesian perspectives. Deprez J.Harvey J., ed. London and New York: Routledge; 1999:.
5. Blecker R. Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models. The economics of demand-led growth. Setterfield M., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2002:.
6. Bowles S.,Boyer R. Wages, aggregate demand, and employment in an open economy: An empirical investigation. Macroeconomic policy after the conservative era. Studies in investment, saving and finance. Epstein G.Gintis H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995:.
7. Crotty J.,Goldstein J. A Marxian-Keynesian theory of investment demand. Empirical evidence: International perspectives on profitability and accumulation. Moseley F.Wolff E., ed. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1992:.
8. Ederer S.,Stockhammer E. Wages and aggregate demand in France: An empirical investigation. Money, distribution, and economic policy - alternatives to orthodox macroeconomics. Hein E.Truger A., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2007:.
9. Demir F.Financial liberalization, private investment and portfolio choice: Financialization of real sectors in emerging markets.Journal of Development Economics. 2009;88:314-24.
10. Flaschel P.,Proano C. AS-AD disequilibrium dynamics and the Taylor interest rate policy rule: Euro-area based estimation and simulation. Aspects of modern monetary and macroeconomic policies. Arestis P.Hein E.Le Heron E., ed. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan; 2007:.
11. Goldstein J. P.Predator-prey model estimates of the cyclical profit squeeze.Metroeconomica. 1999;50 (2): 139-73.
12. Goodwin R. M.Socialism, capitalism and economic growth. Feinstein C. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1967:.
13. Goodwin R. M.The economic law of motion of modern society Essays in nonlinear economic dynamics. Wagener H.Drucker J.Goodwin R., ed. Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang; 1986:.
14. Harvie D.Testing Goodwin: Growth cycles in ten OECD economies.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2000;24:349-76.
15. Hein E.,Vogel L.Distribution and growth reconsidered - empirical results for six OECD countries.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2008;32:479-511.
16. Kalecki M. Theory of economic dynamics. Collected works of Michal Kalecki. Osiatynski J., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1954:.
17. Marglin S.,Bhaduri A. Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory. The golden age of capitalism. Reinterpreting the postwar experience. Marglin S.Schor J., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990:.
18. Marx K.Capital. A critique of political economy. London: Penguin Books; 1976:.
19. Mohun S.,Veneziani R. Goodwin cycles and the U.S. economy 1948-2004. Mathematical economics and the dynamics of capitalism. Flaschel P.Landesmann M., ed. London and New York: Routledge; 2008:107-30.
20. Naastepad C. W. M.,Storm S.OECD demand regimes (1960-2000).Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics. 2006/7;29:213-48.
21. Onaran Ö.,Stockhammer E.Two different export-oriented growth strategies: Accumulation and distribution a la Turca and a la South Korea.Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2005;41 (1): 65-89.
22. OnaranÖ.StockhammerE.GraflL.2009. The finance-dominated growth regime, distribution, and aggregate demand in the US. Vienna University of Economics & B.A. Dept. of EconomicsWorking Paper No. 126.
23. Orhangazi Ö.Financialisation and capital accumulation in the non-financial corporate sector: A theoretical and empirical investigation on the US economy: 1973-2003.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2008;32:863-86.
24. Rowthorn R. Conflict, inflation and money. Cambridge Journal of Economics Capitalism, conflict and inflation. Rowthorn B., ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart; [1977]1980:.
25. Stockhammer E.Financialization and the slowdown of accumulation.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2004;28 (5): 719-41.
26. Cambridge Journal of Economics. Stockhammer E.Onaran Ö.Ederer S., ed. 2009:139-59.
27. Stockhammer E.,Onaran Ö.Accumulation, distribution and employment: A structural VAR approach to a Kaleckian macro-model.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2004; (15): 421-47.
28. Stockhammer E.,Hein E.,Grafl L.Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germany.International Review of Applied Economics. 2011;25 (1): 1-23.
29. Empirica. Stockhammer E.Ederer S., ed. 2008:481-502.
30. van Treeck T.Reconsidering the investment-profit nexus in finance-led economies: An ARDL-based approach.Metroeconomica. 2008;59 (4): 371-404.