Data handling in hyperspectral image analysis

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-22

  Burger, James ^a   Gowen, Aoife ^b  

^a BurgerMetrics   (Latvia)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Chemical imaging; Data reduction; Hypespectral; Image processing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MEMORY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DATA EXTRACTION; DATA SYNTHESIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION STORAGE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROSCOPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 79960151553     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Landgrebe D. Hyperspectral image data analysis. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 2002, 1:17-18.
2. Plaza A., Du Q., Chang Y. High performance computing for hyperspectral image analysis: perspective and state-of-the-art. Proc. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2009, 5:V-72-V-75.
3. Amdahl G. Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large-scale computing capabilities. AFIPS Conference Proceedings 1967, 30:483-485.
4. Eddelbuettel D. Benchmarking Single- and Multi-Core BLAS Implementations and GPUs for Use with R 2010, Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://debian.csie.ntu.edu.tw/R/CRAN/web/packages/gcbd/vignettes/gcbd.pd f.
5. Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.accelereyes.com/.
6. Rosario-Torres S., Velez-Reyes M. Speeding up the MATLAB hyperspectral image analysis toolbox using GPUs and the jacket toolbox. IEEE First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing 2009, 1-4. 10.1109/WHISPERS.2009.5289089.
7. A. Plaza, Recent developments and future directions in parallel processing of remotely sensed hyperspectral images, Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, (2009) 626-631 ISSN: 1845-5921; Print ISBN: 978-953-184-135-1.
8. Kong J., Dimitrov M., Yang Y., Liyanage J., Cao L., Staples J., Mantor M., Zhou H. Accelerating MATLAB image processing toolbox functions on GPUs. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on General-Purpose Computation on Graphics Processing Units (GPGPU-3), Pittsburgh, PA Apr 2010.
9. OpenCLStudio Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.opencldev.com.
10. LAPACK Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.netlib.org/lapack/.
11. Anderson E., Bai Z., Bischof C., Blackford S., Demmel J., Dongarra J., Du~Croz J., Greenbaum A., Hammarling S., McKenney A., Sorensen D. LAPACK Users' Guide 1999, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA. third edition.
12. Blackford L., Demmel J., Dongarra J., Du I., Hammarling S., Henry G., Heroux M., Kaufman L., Lumsdaine A., Petitet A., Pozo R., Remington K., Whaley R. An updated set of basic linear algebra subprograms (BLAS). ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 2002, 28:135-151.
13. Moler C. MATLAB incorporates LAPACK: increasing the speed and capabilities of matrix computation, MATLAB News & Notes Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.mathworks.com/company/newsletters/news_notes/clevescorner/win ter2000.cleve.html.
14. Goto K., Van De Geijn R. High-performance implementation of the level-3 BLAS. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 2008, 35:1-14.
15. Intel MKL Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-mkl/.
16. AMD A.C.M.L. Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://developer.amd.com/cpu/Libraries/acml/Pages/default.aspx.
17. ENVI: ITT Visual Information Services Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.ittvis.com/ProductServices/ENVI.aspx.
18. IDL: ITT Visual Information Services Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.ittvis.com/ProductServices/IDL.aspx.
19. Eigenvector Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.eigenvector.com/.
20. Umbio Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://beta.umbio.com/Public%20files/News.aspx.
21. BurgerMetrics Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.burgermetrics.com/.
22. ImageJ Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/.
23. VTK Date accessed: 13/1/2011. http://www.vtk.org/.
24. Chang C. Exploration of virtual dimensionality. Proc. of SPIE 2006, Vol. 6233:623313-1-623313-12. S.S. Shen, P.E. Lewis (Eds.).
25. Bajorski P. Investigation of virtual dimensionality and broken stick rule for hyperspectral images. IEEE Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) 2010, 1-4. 2nd Workshop on.
26. Chui C. An introduction to wavelets. Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications 1992, Volume 1. Academic Press.
27. Scholl J.F., Dereniak E.L. Higher-dimensional wavelet transforms for hyperspectral data compression and feature recognition. Proceedings of SPIE 2003, Volume 5208:129-140. M.S. Schmalz (Ed.).
28. Scholl J.F., Hege E.K., Lloyd-Hart M., Dereniak E.L. Hyperspectral feature classification with alternate wavelet transform representations. Proceedings of SPIE, Volume 6315, Mathematics of Data/Image Pattern Recognition, Compression and Encryption with Applications IX 2006, 63150G:1-12. San Diego, CA. G.X. Ritter, M.S. Schmalz, J. Barrera, J.T. Astola (Eds.).
29. Liu Y., Chen Y., Wang C., Chan D., Kim M. Development of a simple algorithm for the detection of chilling injury in cucumbers from visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Appl. Spectrosc. 2005, 59:78-85.
30. Du Q. Band selection and its impact on target detection and classification in hyperspectral image analysis. Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003 IEEE Workshop 2003, 374-377.
31. Kim M., Lefcourt A., Chen Y., Tao Y. Automated detection of fecal contamination of apples based on multispectral fluorescence image fusion. J. Food Eng. 2005, 71:85-91.
32. Gowen A.A., O'Donnell C.P., Cullen P.J., Downey G., Frias J.M. Hyperspectral imaging - an emerging process analytical tool for food quality and safety control. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007, 18:590-598.
33. Amigo J.M. Practical issues of hyperspectral imaging analysis of solid dosage forms. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398:93-109.
34. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. 1901, 2:559-572.
35. Geladi P., Isaksson H., Lindqvist L., Wold S. Principal component analysis on multivariate images. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1988, 5:209-220.
36. Barros A., Rutledge D. Segmented principal component transform-principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 78:125-137.
37. Gupta M., Jacobson N. Wavelet principal components analysis and its application to hyperspectral imagery. IEEE. International Conference on Image Processing 2006, 1585-1588.
38. Sindhumol S., Wilscy M. Hyperspectral image analysis - a robust algorithm using support vectors and principal components. International Conference on Computing: Theory and Applications 2007, 389-395.
39. Agarwal A., El-Ghazawi T., El-Askary H., Le-Moigne J. Efficient hierarchical-PCA dimension reduction for hyperspectral imagery, IEEE. International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology 2007, 353-356.
40. De Juan A., Tauler R., Dyson R., Marcolli C., Rault M., Maeder M. Spectroscopic imaging and chemometrics: a powerful combination for global and local sample analysis. Trends Anal. Chem. 2004, 23:70-79.
41. Lim S., Sohn K.H., Lee C. Principal component analysis for compression of hyperspectral images. Proc. IEEE IGARSS 2001, 97-99.
42. Gupta M., Jacobson N. Wavelet principal components analysis and its application to hyperspectral imagery. IEEE. International Conference on Image Processing 2006, 1585-1588.
43. Du Q., Raksuntorn N. Hyperspectral image analysis using noise-adjusted principal component transform. SPIE 2006, 6233:1-10.
44. Chen C. Comparison of principal components analysis and minimum noise fraction transformation for reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery. Geog. Res. 2000, 33:163-178.
45. Ifarraguerri A., Chang C. Unsupervised hyperspectral image analysis with projection pursuit. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2000, 38:2529-2538.
46. Varmuza K., Filzmoser P., Liebmann B. Random projection experiments with chemometric data. J. Chemom. 2010, 24:209-217.
47. Hyvarinen A. Fast and robust fixed point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1999, 10:626-634.
48. Du H., Qi H., Wang X., Ramanath R., Snyder W. Band selection using independent component analysis for hyperspectral image processing. 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR'03) 2003, 93.
49. Feng Y., Lv J., Su J. Feature preserving compression for hyperspectral remote sensing images. The 4th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications 2009, 3843-3847.
50. Khan A., Kim I., Kong S. Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images using kernel ICA. Proc. SPIE 2009, Vol. 7315.