Extending the cultural research infrastructure: The rise of the regional cultural consortiums in England

Cultural Trends

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-44

  Lutz, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultural policy; Cultural research; England; Policy; Regionalism; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960147789     PISSN: 09548963     EISSN: 14693690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09548960600615913     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ackrill, A., and Ackrill, J., 2000. Research needs of the cultural sector: A new research partnership agenda, Warwick: Centre for Cultural Policy Studies.
2. Belfiore, E., 2002. Art as a means of alleviating social inclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies & social impact studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8 (1): 91–106.
3. Belfiore, E., 2004. Auditing culture. The subsidised cultural sector in the new public management. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10 (2): 183–202.
4. Bennett, O., 2004. The torn halves of cultural policy research—Review essay. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10 (2): 237–248.
5. Bradford, G., Garry, M., and Wallach, G., 2000. The politics of culture: Policy perspectives for individuals, institutions and communities, Edited by: Bradford, G., Garry, M., and Wallach, G., New York: The New Press.
6. 2004. Burns Owen Partnership & the School of Performance and Cultural Industries University of Leeds. Regional mapping and economic impact of the creative industries—Final report, Culture South West & South West Regional Development Agency
7. Clark, K., 2004. Why fund heritage? The role of research in the heritage lottery fund. Cultural Trends, 13 (4): 65–85.
8. Cowell, B., 2004. Why heritage counts: Researching the historic environment. Cultural Trends, 13 (4): 23–39.
9. Creative Cultures. January 2004. “ Produced for DCMS Local Government Team: Consultation draft ”. In Guidance on integrating cultural and community strategies, January, London: Department for Culture Media & Sport.
10. Creigh-Tyte, S., and Mundy, G., 2003. A research strategy for DCMS 2003–2005/06, London: Department for Culture Media and Sport. Technical paper no. 3
11. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 1998. A new cultural framework, London: Department for Culture Media & Sport.
12. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 1999. Policy Action Team 10: A report to the Social Exclusion Unit—Arts and sports, London: Department for Culture Media and Sport.
13. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2000. Creating opportunities: Guidance for local authorities in England in local cultural strategies, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
14. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2002. The regional cultural data framework, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Available on request by emailing detresponse@culture.gov.uk
15. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2004a. DCMS evidence toolkit, London: Department for Culture Media and Sport. Technical report Retrieved December 5, 2005, from http://www.culture.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/4B026ACA-025C-4C2F-A86E-4A96E406180E/0/DETTechnicalReportv1August2004.pdf and http://www.culture.gov.uk/global/research/det/
16. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2004b. Statistical release—Participation in sporting and cultural activities—Analysis of the UK 2000 Time Use Survey, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
17. Department for Culture, Media and Sport. 2005. 2005 Annual Report Sponsored Bodies Part Two, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
18. Dobbs, L., Moore, C., and Simpson, G., 2004. A scoping exercise to explore the impact of cultural activities on economically inactive adults, Newcastle: Newcastle upon Tyne Centre for Public Policy, Northumbria University.
19. Elson, M., and Downing, L., 2005. Culture and the regional spatial strategy for the South-West, Oxford: Oxford Brookes University. Final report
20. Evans, G., 2001. Cultural planning: An urban renaissance, London: Routledge.
21. Evans, G., 2005. Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42 (5/6): 959–983.
22. Evans, G., and Shaw, P., 2004. “ Report to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport ”. In The contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: A review of the evidence, London: London Metropolitan University.
23. Faber, Maunsell., 2004. “ Final report, commissioned by North West Development Agency ”. In Commonwealth Games benefits study, Warrington: Faber Maunsell.
24. Garcia, B., 2004. Cultural policy and urban regeneration in Western European cities: Lessons from experience, prospects for the future. Local Economy, 19 (4): 312–326.
25. Gilmore, A., 2004. Local cultural strategies: A strategic review. Cultural Trends, 13 (3): 3–32.
26. Gould, H., 2004. Developing the role of the arts in U.K. social policy, Discussion paper. Creative Exchange Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://www.creativeexchange.org/html/projects/themapro.html
27. Hesmondhalgh, D., and Pratt, A., 2005. Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11 (1): 1–13.
28. Holden, J., 2004. Capturing cultural value: How culture has become a tool of government policy, London: Demos.
29. Holden, J., 2005. Valuing culture in the South East, London: Demos.
30. Hutton, L., Bridgewood, A., and Dust, K., 2004. Research at Arts Council England. Cultural Trends, 13 (4): 41–64.
31. Jeffery, C., and Mawson, J., 2002. Introduction: Beyond the White Paper on the English regions. Regional Studies, 36 (7): 715–720.
32. Joined Up North. 2005. “ Final report for Culture North East ”. In An examination of the diversity and distinctiveness of the retail environment in the North East of England, Newcastle: Joined Up North.
33. Jubb, M., 2004. Commentary: Research activities & strategies in the culture & heritage sectors. Cultural Trends, 13 (4): 82–92.
34. Keaney, E., 2005. Culture & civic renewal: The human face of regeneration. Engage, 1 (August) Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.ippr.org.uk/articles.asp?id = 1629&fid = 55
35. Matarasso, F., 1996. Defining values: Evaluating arts programmes, the social impact of the arts Stroud, Comedia
36. Matarasso, F., 2003. Smoke and mirrors: A response to Paola Merli's Evaluating the social impact of arts activities International Journal of Cultural Policy 18(1). International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19 (3): 337–346.
37. Mehdyzadeh, H., 2004. Searching for the evidence: An introduction EU social science information retrieval, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Technical paper no. 5
38. Mercer, C., 2002. Towards cultural citizenship: Tools for cultural policy, Stockholm: Development Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation.
39. Merli, P., 2002. Evaluating the social impact of arts activities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18 (1): 107–118.
40. Miles, S., and Paddison, R., 2005. Introduction: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42 (5/6): 833–839.
41. Musterd, S., and Ostendorf, W., 2004. Creative cultural knowledge cities: Perspectives and planning strategies. Built Environment, 30 (3): 189–193.
42. Newman, T., Curtis, K., and Stephens, J., 2003. Do community based arts projects result in social gains? A review of the literature. Community Development Journal, 38 (4): 1004–1021.
43. Oakley, K., 2004. Developing the evidence base for support of cultural & creative activities in SE England Jointly commissioned and published by South East England Cultural Consortium & South East England Development Agency. Retrieved on December 5, 2005, from http://www.culturesoutheast.org.uk/media/uploads/18/Oakley%20with%20logo.pdf
44. Personal Communication from Principal Research Officer, DCMS. 2005. September 30
45. Pratt, A., 2005. Cultural industries and public policy: An oxymoron?. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11 (1): 31–44.
46. Quinn, B., 2005. Arts festivals and the city. Urban Studies, 42 (5/6): 927–943.
47. Regional Cultural Consortium Research Network. 2004. Regional Cultural Consortium Research Network—Draft terms of reference Unpublished
48. Schuster, M., 2002. Informing cultural policy—The research and information infrastructure, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
49. Selwood, S., 2002. The politics of data collection. Cultural Trends, 12 (47): 13–84.
50. Selwood, S., London. Valuing culture—Measuring culture., June 17. Paper presented at Valuing Culture conference.
51. Selwood, S., Collecting the evidence in England., June 4. Glasgow: Paper presented at One Culture: Many Data? seminar, Centre for Cultural Policy Research, University of Glasgow.
52. Selwood, S., 2005. Commentaries. John Holden's capturing cultural value: How culture has become a tool of cultural policy commentary. Cultural Trends, 14 (1): 113–118.
53. Steele, D., 2004. Developing the evidence base for U.K. film strategy. Cultural Trends, 13 (4): 5–21.
54. Stratton-Smith, R., 2004. Local cultural planning: The view from the Department for Culture Media and Sport. Cultural Trends, 13 (3): 33–36.
55. Taylor, C., Montreal. The creative industries in regional development: Case studies of evidence-based policy from the English regions., August 25–28. Unpublished paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Cultural Policy Research.
56. Tomaney, J., 2002. The evolution of regionalism in England. Regional Studies, 36 (7): 721–731.
57. West Midlands Regional Observatory. 2004. Real lives real issues: A state of the region report, Birmingham: West Midlands Regional Observatory.