Cr(VI) Immobilization Process in a Cr-Spiked Soil by Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles: Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology

Clean - Soil, Air, Water

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 633-640

  Alidokht, Leila ^a   Khataee, Ali Reza ^a   Reyhanitabar, Adel ^a   Oustan, Shahin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

Author keywords

Central composite design; Cr(VI) reduction; Fe 0 nanoparticles; Optimization; Soil contamination

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; IMMOBILIZATION; IRON; OPTIMIZATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL SURFACE;

EID: 79960144220     PISSN: 18630650     EISSN: 18630669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201000461     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. J. Kotas, Z. Stasicka, Chromium Occurrence in the Environment and Methods of Its Speciation, Environ. Pollut. 2000, 107, 263.
2. D. C. Adriano, Trace Elements in the Terrestrial Environment, Springer, New York 1986.
3. F. C. Richard, A. C. M. Broug, Aqueous Geochemistry of Chromium: A Review, Water Res. 1991, 25 (7), 807.
4. S. L. Shupack, The Chemistry of Chromium and Some Resulting Analytical Problems, Environ. Health Perspect. 1991, 92, 7.
5. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US, EPA), Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH 1992.
6. M. Vanishtein, P. Kuschk, J. Mattusch, A. Vatsourina, A. Wiessner, Model Experiments on the Microbial Removal of Chromium from Contaminated Groundwater, Water Res. 2003, 37, 1401.
7. H. Qian, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, X. Xu, Kinetics of Hexavalent Chromium Reduction by Iron Metal, Environ. Sci. Eng. Chin. 2008, 2 (1), 51.
8. T. Wittbrodt, C. D. Palmer, Reduction of Cr(VI) in the Presence of Excess Soil Fulvic Acid, Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 1.
9. E. B. Besseliever, The Treatment of Industrial Wastes, McGraw Hill, New York 1969.
10. J. Cao, W. X. Zhang, Stabilization of Chromium Ore Processing Residue (CROP) with Nanoscale Iron Particles, J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 132, 213.
11. X. Q. Li, J. Cao, W. X. Zhang, Stoichiometry of Cr(VI) Immobilization Using Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron (nZVI): A Study with High Resolution X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HR-XPS), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 2131.
12. F. He, D. Zhao, Application of Novel Stabilizers for Enhanced Mobility and Reactivity of Iron-based Nanoparticles for In situ Destruction of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Soils, Extended abstract and presentation, 230th ACS National Meeting, 28 August-1 September, Washington, DC 2005.
13. S. M. Ponder, J. G. Darab, T. E. Mallouk, Remediation of Cr(VI) and Pb(II) Aqueous Solutions Using Supported Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 2564.
14. 0 Nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1640.
15. P. He, D. Y. Zhao, Preparation and Characterization of New Class of Starch Stabilized Bimetallic Nanoparticles for Degradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Water, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3314.
16. Y. Xu, D. Zhao, Reductive Immobilization of Chromate in Water and Soil Using Stabilized Iron Nanoparticles, Water Res. 2007, 41, 2101.
17. 0 Nanoparticles for Removal of Hexavalent Chromium in Water, Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 4994.
18. H. L. Lein, D. W. Elliott, Y. P. Sun, W. X. Zhang, Recent Progress in Zero-valent Iron Nanoparticles for Groundwater Remediation, J. Environ. Eng. Manage. 2006, 16, 371.
19. M. J. Chen, K. N. Chen, C. W. Lin, Optimization on Response Surface Models for the Optimal Manufacturing Conditions of Dairy Tofu, J. Food Eng. 2005, 68, 471.
20. F. Karacan, U. Ozden, S. Karacan, Optimization of Manufacturing Conditions for Activated Carbon from Turkish Lignite by Chemical Activation Using Response Surface Methodology, Appl. Therm. Eng. 2007, 27, 1212.
21. 4 as Chemical Activator for Adsorption of Phenolic Compounds, Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 6586.
22. M. Ahmadi, F. Vahabzadeh, B. Bonakdarpour, E. Mofarrah, M. Mehranian, Application of the Central Composite Design and Response Surface Methodology to the Advanced Treatment of Olive Oil Processing Wastewater Using Fenton's Peroxidation, J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 123, 187.
23. K. Tarangini, A. Kumar, G. R. Satpathy, V. K. Sangal, Statistical Optimization of Process Parameters for Cr(VI) Biosorption onto Mixed Cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis, Clean - Soil Air Water 2009, 37 (4-5), 319.
24. B. Kiran, A. Kaushik, C. P. Kaushik, Response Surface Methodological Approach for Optimizing Removal of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution Using Immobilized Cyanobacterium, Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 126, 147.
25. 6+ Ions by Mucor racemosus, Clean - Soil Air Water 2010, 38 (5-6), 492.
26. 2/UV System: Optimization and Modeling Using a Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Based on the Central Composite Design, Dyes Pigment. 2007, 75, 533.
27. 2 Nanoparticles by Central Composite Design: Intermediates Identification, J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 886.
28. A. F. Martins, F. Mayer, E. C. Confortin, C. S. Frank, A Study of Photocatalytic Process Involving the Degradation of the Organic Load and Amoxicillin in Hospital Wastewater, Clean - Soil Air Water 2009, 37 (4-5), 365.
29. A. Massumi, N. M. Najafi, H. Barzegari, Speciation of Cr(VI)/Cr(III) in Environmental Waters by Fluorimetric Method Using Central Composite, Full and Fractional Factorial Design, Microchem. J. 2002, 72, 93.
30. T. Ölmez, The Optimization of Cr(VI) Reduction and Removal by Electrocoagulation Using Response Surface Methodology, J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1371.
31. B. D. Cullity, Elements of X-ray Diffraction, Addiso-Wesley Publication Co., Reading, MA 1978.
32. US Salinity Staff, Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils, USDA Handbook 60, US Salinity Staff, Washington, DC 1954.
33. Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collection Soil Sample, USDA SCS, Washington, DC 1992.
34. W. Nelson, L. Sommers, Total Carbon and Organic Matter, in Methods of Soil Analysis (Eds: A. L. Page, D. R. Keeny ), Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI 1982.
35. A. Klute, Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1 - Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn., Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI 1986.
36. C. A. Bower, Exchangeable Cation Analysis of Saline and Alkali Soils, Soil Sci. Proc. 1954, 73, 251.
37. K. V. Ragnarsdottir, D. P. Hawkins, Bioavailable Copper and Manganese in Soils from Iceland and Their Relationship with Scrapie Occurrence in Sheep, J. Geochem. Explor. 2006, 88, 228.
38. R. P. Gambrell, W. H. Patrick, Manganese, in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 (Eds: A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, D. R. Keeney ), Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI 1982.
39. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), Method 7196A, Revision 1. Chromium, Hexavalent (Colorimetric), Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC 1992.
40. G. E. P. Box, K. B. Wilson, On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions, J. R. Statist. Soc. B 1951, 13, 1.
41. A. R. Khataee, Optimization of UV-promoted Peroxydisulphate Oxidation of C.I. Basic Blue 3 Using Response Surface Methodology, Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 73.
42. A. Aleboyeh, N. Daneshvar, M. B. Kasiri, Optimization of C.I. Acid Red 14 Azo Dye Removal by Electrocoagulation Batch Process with Response Surface Methodology, Chem. Eng. Process. 2008, 47, 827.
43. G. E. P. Box, D. W. Behnken, Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables, J. Technometr. 1960, 2, 455.
44. G. E. P. Box, N. P. Draper, Response Surface Mixtures and Ridge Analysis, 2nd edn., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey 2007.
45. D. P. Haaland, Experimental Design in Biotechnology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Basel 1989.
46. H. Zhou, Y. He, Y. Lan, J. Mao, S. Chen, Influence of Complex Reagents on Removal of Chromium(VI) by Zero-Valent Iron, Chemosphere 2008, 72, 870.
47. F. O. Hammache, N. H. Maouche, F. A. Benissad, S. B. Bacha, Central Composite Design for the Modeling of the Phenol Adsorption Process in a Fixed-bed Reactor, J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 2489.