On the challenges and opportunities of physically situated dialog

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-10-05, Issue , 2010, Pages 2-7

  Bohus, Dan ^a   Horvitz, Eric ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

DIALOG MANAGEMENT; LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; OPEN WORLD; RECENT PROGRESS; SITUATED SYSTEMS; SITUATIONAL CONTEXT; TURN-TAKING; UNCONSTRAINED ENVIRONMENTS;

TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EID: 79960143417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. M. Argyle and M. Cook, 1976, Gaze and Mutual Gaze, Cambridge University Press, New York
2. D. Bohus, and E. Horvitz, 2009. Models for Multiparty Engagement in Open-World Dialog, in Proc. of SIGdial'09, London, UK.
3. D. Bohus, and E. Horvitz, 2009. Learning to Predict Engagement with a Spoken Dialog System in Open-World Settings, in Proc. SIGdial'09, London, UK
4. D. Bohus, and E. Horvitz, 2009. Dialog in the Open-World: Platform and Applications, in Proceedings of ICMI'09, Boston, MA
5. D. Bohus, and E. Horvitz, 2010. Computational Models for Multiparty Turn-Taking, Technical Report, Microsoft Research.
6. D. Bohus, and E. Horvitz, 2010. Facilitating Multiparty Dialog with Gaze, Gesture and Speech, in Proceedings of ICMI'10, Beijing, China.
7. H. Clark, and T. Carlson, 1982. Hearers and speech acts, Language, 58, 332-373.
8. S. Duncan, 1972. Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23, 283-292.
9. E. Goffman, 1963, Behaviour in public places: notes on the social order of gatherings, The Free Press, New York
10. C. Goodwin, 1980. Restarts, pauses and the achievement of mutual gaze at turn-beginning, Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4), 272-302.
11. E.T. Hall, 1966, The Hidden Dimension: man's use of space in public and private, New York: Doubleday.
12. A. Kendon, 1990a, A description of some human greetings, Conducting Interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters, Cambridge University Press
13. A. Kendon, 1990b, Spatial organization in social encounters: the F-formation system, Conducting Interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters, Studies in International Sociolinguistics, Cambridge University Press
14. Microsoft Robotics Studio web-site - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ robotics/default.aspx
15. A. Raux, and M. Eskenazi, 2008. Optimizing end-pointing thresholds using dialogue features in a spoken dialogue system, in Proc. SIGdial-2008, Columbus, OH.
16. A. Raux, and M. Eskenazi, 2008. A Finite-State Turn-Taking Model for Spoken Dialog Systems, in Proc. HLT-2009, Boulder, CO.
17. H. Sacks, E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson, 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation, Language, 50, 696-735.
18. E. Schegloff, 2000. Accounts of Conduct in Interaction: Interruption, Overlap and Turn-Taking, The handbook of sociological theory, 287-321, New York: Plenum.
19. E. Schegloff, 2000. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking in conversation, Language in Society, 29, 1-63.
20. C.L. Sidner, C. Lee, C.D. Kidd, N. Lesh, and C. Rich, 2005, Explorations in engagement for humans and robots, Artificial Intelligence, 166(1-2), pp. 140-164
21. Situated Interaction, project web-page - http://research.microsoft.com/ ~dbohus/research-situated-interaction.html
22. K.R. Thorisson, 2002. Natural Turn-Taking Needs No Manual: Computational Theory and Model, from Perceptions to Action, Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 173-207.
23. D. Traum, and J. Rickel, 2002. Embodied Agents for Multiparty Dialogue in Immersive Virtual World, in Proc. AAMAS-2002, 766-773.
24. J. Wiemann, and M. Knapp, 1975. Turn-taking in conversation, Journal of Communication, 25, 75-92.