Validation of methods performance for routine biochemistry analytes at cobas 6000 analyzer series module c501;Validacija metoda za određivanje rutinskih biokemijskih analita na analizatoru cobas 6000 model serije c501

Biochemia Medica

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 182-190

  Smolcic, Vesna Supak ^a   Bilic Zulle, Lidija ^a,b   Fisic, Elizabeta ^a  

^a KBC RIJEKA   (Croatia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RIJEKA   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Analytical; Chemistry techniques; Cobas 6000 analyzer; Passing and bablock regression; Total error; Validation study

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; CALCIUM; CHLORIDE; CHOLESTEROL; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN A; IMMUNOGLOBULIN M; PROTEIN; SODIUM; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BLOOD ANALYSIS; ERROR; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ION SELECTIVE ELECTRODE; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 79960136113     PISSN: 13300962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bonini PA, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Ruboli FF. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002;48: 691-8.
2. Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic AM. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med 2010;20): 126-30.
3. Westgard JO, Method validation - The real world applications. Available at: http://www.westgard.com/qcapp14.htm. Accessed February 12th, 2011.
4. Fraser CG, Hytloft Petersen P. Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications. Clin Chem 1999;45: 321-3.
5. Gašljević V. Method validation and measurement uncertainty. Biochem Med 2010;20: 57-63.
6. Westgard JO. The meaning and Application of total error. Available at: http://www.westgard.com/essay111.htm. Accessed February 12th, 2011.
7. Cobas 6000 analyzer series operator's manual, Roche, Mannheim, Germany.
8. Westgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clin Chem 1974;20: 825-33.
9. th, 2011.
10. Billić-Zulle L. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablock regression. Biochem Med 2011;21: 49-52.
11. van Gammeren AJ, van Gool N, de Groot MJM, Cobbaert CM. Analytical performance evaluation of the Cobas 6000 analyzer - special emphasis on trueness verification. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46: 863-71.
12. Fraser CG, Hytloft Petersen P. Desirable standards for laboratory tests if they are to fulfill medical needs. Clin Chem 1993;39: 1447-55.
13. Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Ricos C, Haeckel R. Proposed quality specifications for the imprecision and inaccuracy of analytical systems in clinical chemistry. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1992;30: 311-7.
14. Hyltoft Petersen P, Ricos C, Stöckl D, Libeer JC, Baadenhuijsen H, Fraser C, et al. Proposed guidelines for the internal quality control of analytical results in the medical laboratory. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1996; 34: 983-99.
15. Ricos C, Perich C, Minchinela J, Alvarez V, Simon M, Biosca C et al. Application of biological variation - a review. Biochem Med 2009;19: 250-9.
16. Westgard JO, Seehafer JJ, Barry PL. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency testing criteria. Clin Chem 1994; 40: 1228-32.
17. Stöckl D. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria. Clin Chem 1995; 41: 120-1.
18. Westgard JO, Darcy T. The truth about quality: medical usefulness and analytical reliability of laboratory tests. Clin Chim Acta 2004;346: 3-11.
19. Hyltoft Petersen P, Stöckl D, Blaabjerg O, Pedersen B, Birkemose E, Thienpont L, et al. Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with reference method by use of difference plots. Clin Chem 1997;43: 2039-46.
20. Challand GS, Li P. The assessment of interpretation of test results in laboratory medicine. Biochem Med 2009;19: 146-53.
21. Fraser CG, Hytloft Petersen P. Desirable standards for laboratory tests if they are to fulfill medical needs. Clin Chem 1993;39: 1447-55.
22. Westgard JO, Seehafer JJ, Barry PL. Allowable imprecision for laboratory tests based on clinical and analytical test outcome criteria. Clin Chem 1994;40: 1909-14.
23. Hyltoft Petersen P, Fraser CG. Setting in Clinical Chemistry: Can competing models based on analytical, biological and clinical outcomes be harmonized? Clin Chem 1994;40: 1865-68.