Optimal Design of Water Distribution Networks Using Parameter-Setting-Free Harmony Search for Two Major Parameters

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 377-380

  Geem, Zong Woo ^a   Cho, Yoon Ho ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Design; Parameters; Water distribution systems

Indexed keywords

ANURA; APIS MELLIFERA;

EID: 79960114342     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000130     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. Ayvaz M.T. Application of harmony search algorithm to the solution of groundwater management models. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(6):916-924. AWREDI, 0309-1708, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.003
2. Cheng Y.M. Li L. Lansivaara T. Chi S.C. Sun Y.J. An improved harmony search minimization algorithm using different slip surface generation methods for slope stability analysis. Eng. Optim. 2008, 40(2):95-115. EGOPAX, 0305-215X, 10.1080/03052150701618153
3. Čistý M. Automated calibration of the simulation model of irrigation projects by harmony search optimization. J. Water Land Dev. 2008, 12:3-13. 1429-7426, 10.2478/v10025-009-0001-1
4. Cunha M.C. Sousa J. Water distribution network design optimization: Simulated annealing approach. J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt. 1999, 125(4):215-221. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:4(215)
5. Eusuff M. Lansey K.E. Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2003, 129(3):210-225. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(210)
6. Geem Z.W. Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Eng. Optim. 2006, 38(3):259-280. EGOPAX, 0305-215X, 10.1080/03052150500467430
7. Geem Z.W. Optimal scheduling of multiple dam system using harmony search algorithm. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2007, 4507:316-323. LNCSD9, 0302-9743, 10.1007/978-3-540-73007-1_39
8. Geem Z.W. Novel derivative of harmony search algorithm for discrete design variables. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 199(1):223-230. AMHCBQ, 0096-3003, 10.1016/j.amc.2007.09.049
9. Geem Z.W. Music-inspired harmony search algorithms: Theory and applications 2009, (a). Springer, Berlin.
10. Geem Z.W. Particle-swarm harmony search for water network design. Eng. Optim. 2009, 41(4):297-311. EGOPAX, 0305-215X, 10.1080/03052150802449227
11. Geem Z.W. Harmony search optimization to the pump-included water distribution network design. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 2009, 26(3):211-221. 1028-6608, 10.1080/10286600801919813
12. Geem Z.W. Hydraulic analysis of water distribution network using harmony search. Proc. of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009, ASCE, Reston, VA.
13. Geem Z.W. Multiobjective optimization of time-cost trade-off using harmony search. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2010, 136(6):711-716. JCEMD4, 0733-9364, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000167
14. Geem Z.W. Kim J.H. Loganathan G.V. new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 2001, 76(2):60-68. SIMUA2, 0037-5497, 10.1177/003754970107600201
15. Geem Z.W. Williams J.C. Ecological optimization using harmony search. Proc. of American Conf. on Applied Mathematics 2008, 148-152. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
16. Gibbs M.S. Maier H.R. Dandy G.C. Comparison of genetic algorithm parameter setting methods for chlorine injection optimization. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2010, 136(2):288-291. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000033
17. Kim J.H. Geem Z.W. Kim E.S. Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using harmony search. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37(5):1131-1138. JWRAF5, 1093-474X, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03627.x
18. Lee J.H. Yoon Y.S. Modified harmony search algorithm and neural networks for concrete mix proportion design. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2009, 23(1):57-61. JCCEE5, 0887-3801, 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:1(57)
19. Lin M.-D. Liub Y.-H. Liua G.-F. Chua C.-W. Scatter search heuristic for least-cost design of water distribution networks. Eng. Optim. 2007, 39(7):857-876. EGOPAX, 0305-215X, 10.1080/03052150701503611
20. Lippai I. Heaney J.P. Laguna M. Robust water system design with commercial intelligent search optimizers. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 1999, 13(3):135-143. JCCEE5, 0887-3801, 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:3(135)
21. Mahdavi M. Fesanghary M. Damangir E. An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 188(2):1567-1579. AMHCBQ, 0096-3003, 10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.033
22. Maier H.R. Ant colony optimization for design of water distribution systems. J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt. 2003, 129(3):200-209. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(200)
23. Mohan S. Jinesh Babu K.S. Optimal water distribution network design with honey-bee mating optimization. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2010, 24(1):117-126. JCCEE5, 0887-3801, 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000018
24. Mun S. Geem Z.W. Determination of viscoelastic and damage properties of hot mix asphalt concrete using harmony search algorithm. Mech. Mater. 2009, 41(3):339-353. MSMSD3, 0167-6636, 10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.11.008
25. Perelman L. Ostfeld A. An adaptive heuristic cross-entropy algorithm for optimal design of water distribution systems. Eng. Optim. 2007, 39(4):413-428. EGOPAX, 0305-215X, 10.1080/03052150601154671
26. Rossman L.A. EPANET2 users manual 2000, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
27. Saka M.P. Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2007, 10(6):595-606. 1369-4332, 10.1260/136943307783571445
28. Savic D.A. Walters G.A. Genetic algorithms for least-cost design of water distribution networks. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 1997, 123(2):67-77. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:2(67)
29. Srinivas M. Patnaik L. Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1994, 24(4):656-667. ISYMAW, 0018-9472, 10.1109/21.286385
30. Zhang J. Chung H. Lo W.L. Clustering-based adaptive crossover and mutation probabilities for genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2007, 11(3):326-335. 1089-778X, 10.1109/TEVC.2006.880727