Diagnostic performance of electrocardiography in the assessment of significant coronary artery disease and its anatomical size in comparison with coronary angiography

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 750-755

  Mahmoodzadeh, Solmaz ^a   Moazenzadeh, Mansour ^a   Rashidinejad, Hamidreza ^a   Sheikhvatan, Mehrdad ^b  

^a KERMAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Electrocardiogram; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL INDICATOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX PAIN;

EID: 79960109381     PISSN: 17351995     EISSN: 17357136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Dorr R. Acute coronary syndrome-a challenge for the cooperation between outpatient and inpatient care. Herz 2008; 33(6): 395-401. [In German].
2. Shabestari AA, Abdi S, Akhlaghpoor S, Azadi M, Baharjoo H, Pajouh MD, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99(12): 1656-61.
3. Bax JJ, Schuijf JD. Which role for multislice computed tomography in clinical cardiology? Am Heart J 2005; 149(6): 960-1.
4. Horacek BM, Wagner GS. Electrocardiographic ST-segment changes during acute myocardial ischemia. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2002; 6(3): 196-203.
5. Fesmire FM, Percy RF, Bardoner JB, Wharton DR, Calhoun FB. Usefulness of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring during the initial emergency department evaluation of patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31(1): 3-11.
6. Rude RE, Poole WK, Muller JE, Turi Z, Rutherford J, Parker C, et al. Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patients. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52(8): 936-42.
7. Katsaris GA, Tsaritsaniotis EI, Tsounos IP, Panisois KD, Katsaris IA, Kaprinis IK, et al. Surface electrocardiogram in the detection of myocardial ischemia during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Angiology 1993; 44(10): 797-802.
8. Daly CA, Clemens F, Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, et al. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005; 26(10): 996-1010.
9. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, Bricker JT, Duvernoy WF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30(1): 260-311.
10. Melendez LJ, Jones DT, Salcedo JR. Usefulness of three additional electrocardiographic chest leads (V7, V8, and V9) in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Can Med Assoc J 1978; 119(7): 745-8.
11. Holubkov R, Pepine CJ, Rickens C, Reichek N, Rogers WJ, Sharaf BL, et al. Electrocardiogram abnormalities predict angiographic coronary artery disease in women with chest pain: results from the NHLBI WISE Study. Clin Cardiol 2002; 25(12): 553-8.
12. Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Perach W, Perruchoud AP, Buettner HJ. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with very early revascularization. Am J Med 2004; 117(3): 145-50.